This just in . . .

"When I saw the image my response was 'Oh my god, a vulva," New York University anthropology professor Randall White, the paper's lead author is reported as saying by NewsCore.


Yeah. I'm pretty sure "Randy the AnthroNerd" needs to put down the Twinkies, step away from the caves and maybe actually SEE one before he makes that determination. Ya know what I'm say'in???

The boy obviously needs to get laid BAD!!!

I bet he has SEVERAL of you fine writers marked as "Favorites", though! :D
 
Last edited:
It reminds me of those constellation maps where a handful of stars, scattered at random to the untrained eye, are connected with three or four straight lines and it's supposed to be Apollo at Delphi. And superimposed upon the connected dots is an elaborate drawing of Apollo on a chariot before a marble pillared temple for the benefit of those of us who are too dense to see so obvious a pattern in the night sky.
 
You guys make me feel better. I was afraid my visual imagination was starting to go. I understand it's the first thing . . .
 
Just for comparison's sake:
This is a vulva.
attachment.php

:cattail:
 
Nope, can't say as I recognize any resemblance. Now, back to my story on being turned into a nymph against her will . . .
 
The world's oldest art has been dated to 37,000 years ago and it's . . . PORN!
Well, it is French. :rolleyes:

I have a really filthy mind and I can't see any vulva in this rock. Can you?
You can't compare the rock to your picture...the woman they were copying probably had pubic hair and they were doing it by torch light. Can we get a picture of a woman's vulva with pubic hair by torch light? :confused:
 
Well, it is French. :rolleyes:


You can't compare the rock to your picture...the woman they were copying probably had pubic hair and they were doing it by torch light. Can we get a picture of a woman's vulva with pubic hair by torch light? :confused:
Oh sure, just let me remember to bring my camera to the next Crunchy Granola skinnydip barbecue event. :cattail:
 
You can't compare the rock to your picture...the woman they were copying probably had pubic hair and they were doing it by torch light. Can we get a picture of a woman's vulva with pubic hair by torch light? :confused:


So are you saying that's what a 37,000 y.o., hairy vulva looked like???

Might I also add the word, "EEEEEEWWWWW!!!" to go along with that concept of yours? I don't mean to be ageist, but DAMN! :eek:
 
Maybe the researcher just needs to spend less time in the lab?

Religious nuts are forever seeing Mary and Jesus in toast, and coffee, and clouds, and everything else, because that's what they want to see.

Dude probably just needs to get laid :p
 
It doesn't look like much of anything to me, but If I had to see something, it looks more like a penis and scrotum than a vulva. :confused:

BTW, even though this is a porn site, it's nice to use more technical words sometimes. :D
 
So are you saying that's what a 37,000 y.o., hairy vulva looked like???
I don't think it was 37,000 years old when the sculptor tried to capture it. Perhaps he/she couldn't see too well by the torchlight? Or maybe was in a hurry to finish so he/she could enjoy the real thing?

It doesn't look like much of anything to me, but If I had to see something, it looks more like a penis and scrotum than a vulva.
And so say all of us, so far. I wonder if the article got it wrong? Maybe they meant male genitals? It's certainly make more sense. I mean, a guy could even sculpt it himself just by looking down. :D
 
Back
Top