This Isn't Political, And It could Be Bullshit, Or It Could Be Amazing

Rightguide

Prof Triggernometry
Joined
Feb 7, 2017
Posts
66,985

Scientists who discovered 'vast city' underneath Egypt's Giza pyramid reveal new secrets about mysterious structures​

By STACY LIBERATORE FOR DAILYMAIL.COM

Published: 22:58 EDT, 22 March 2025 | Updated: 11:53 EDT, 23 March 2025


The mystery of an 'underground city' beneath Egypt's pyramid deepens as scientists have shared new details about what may lie more than 4,000 feet below the surface.

A team of Italian researchers claimed they uncovered giant vertical shafts wrapped in 'spiral staircases' and a massive limestone platform containing two enormous chambers with descending channels resembling pipelines.

During a news briefing released Saturday, the researchers said a water system had been identified beneath the platform, located more than 2,100 feet below the Khafre Pyramid, with underground pathways leading even deeper into the earth.

The team used radar pulses to create high-resolution images deep into the ground beneath the structures, the same way sonar radar is used to map the depths of the ocean.

While the bombshell claims have been dismissed by other experts as 'false' and 'exaggerated,' the team believes there is 'an entire hidden world of many structures' more than 2,000 feet below the water system

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/science...gypts-Giza-pyramid-mysterious-structures.html

World News

‘Vast underground city’ found below Egypt’s Giza pyramids, scientists claim in ‘groundbreaking’ wild theory​

By
Nicholas McEntyre
Published March 23, 2025, 9:55 a.m. ET

https://nypost.com/2025/03/23/world...-found-below-egypts-giza-pyramids-scientists/

https://www.thesun.co.uk/tech/33995030/structures-under-egypt-pyramids-new-discovery-city/

I don't see how they arrive at the at the detailed conceptions from the radar-scanned images. but there is something there.
 

Scientists who discovered 'vast city' underneath Egypt's Giza pyramid reveal new secrets about mysterious structures​


I don't see how they arrive at the at the detailed conceptions from the radar-scanned images. but there is something there.
Nice to see you rounding out your lack of understanding by delving into other subjects.
 
Not bullshit
Very interesting however. I don't have the scientific knowledge to interpret those scans. I will leave that to competent scientific practitioners of that science. I am quite familiar with the archeology and history of the Giza plateau and Egyptian civilization. So I do have an interest in any new discoveries. I find the history and construction there to be fascinating.
 
Very interesting however. I don't have the scientific knowledge to interpret those scans. I will leave that to competent scientific practitioners of that science. I am quite familiar with the archeology and history of the Giza plateau and Egyptian civilization. So I do have an interest in any new discoveries. I find the history and construction there to be fascinating.
Archaeology continues to make amazing new discoveries relevant to human history.

Sadly, most of our current history will be lost due to the media it is recorded on.
 
Archaeology continues to make amazing new discoveries relevant to human history.

Sadly, most of our current history will be lost due to the media it is recorded on.

While it is a major concern that digital media is fragile, physical archives, printed records, a number of international preservation efforts are working hard to ensure that history remains accessible for future generations.
 
While it is a major concern that digital media is fragile, physical archives, printed records, a number of international preservation efforts are working hard to ensure that history remains accessible for future generations.
Unfortunately, there is just too much out there to properly document.
 
While it is a major concern that digital media is fragile, physical archives, printed records, a number of international preservation efforts are working hard to ensure that history remains accessible for future generations.

https://www.livescience.com/physics...ed-to-be-hundreds-of-times-bigger-than-normal

Maybe the theory that the Crystal Skulls are storage devices isn't so far fetched either.

However, I will wait and see before rushing out to buy a new Skeleton Drive.
 
It’s TOTAL BULLSHIT, but congratulations to Rightard for starting ANOTHER garbage thread.

😑

Is this an attempt by Rigjtard to distract from President Musk (and DonOld) trashing democracy, the economy, and foreign relations???

🤔

😑

👉 Rightard 🤣

🇺🇸

Also:

We. Told. Them. So.

🌷
 
Then you must know the ancient Egyptians could not even dig 4,000 feet below the surface.
I never would believe that but I want to see more evidence that the structure now claimed actually exists in the form reported. I have doubted they built the Pyramids as claimed in the first place.

In addition some of their statues are made of the hardest of granites. It is a simple fact that pink granite is harder than copper on the Mohs scale of hardness. It's not even close to being hard enough to work granite, which is 6-7 on the Mohs scale. Copper being a 3. Granite is even harder than some mild steel which the Egyptians reportedly didn't have. The foundation of the Great Pyramid is 756 x 756 feet on a side of solid stone leveled to with a fraction of an inch 2.1 CM in some spots over an area of 571,536 square feet (13 acres) would be a feat of engineering difficult even today. I thinking the Egyptians found the structures and claimed them for their own makes more sense compared to the levels of tooling and technology they are reported to have had..
 
I never would believe that but I want to see more evidence that the structure now claimed actually exists in the form reported. I have doubted they built the Pyramids as claimed in the first place.

In addition some of their statues are made of the hardest of granites. It is a simple fact that pink granite is harder than copper on the Mohs scale of hardness. It's not even close to being hard enough to work granite, which is 6-7 on the Mohs scale. Copper being a 3. Granite is even harder than some mild steel which the Egyptians reportedly didn't have. The foundation of the Great Pyramid is 756 x 756 feet on a side of solid stone leveled to with a fraction of an inch 2.1 CM in some spots over an area of 571,536 square feet (13 acres) would be a feat of engineering difficult even today. I thinking the Egyptians found the structures and claimed them for their own makes more sense compared to the levels of tooling and technology they are reported to have had..
Is there a conspiracy theory which disputes current scientific proof that you don't believe?

https://www.livescience.com/pink-granite-sarcophagus-ancient-egypt

And this is just one of hundreds of articles on Egyptian carvings using "pink" granite over thousands of years....
 
I don't have the scientific knowledge to interpret those scans.
The absolute most honest thing you have ever said here.
I will leave that to competent scientific practitioners of that science.

Yeeeeeah. Ok.
Why start now?

I’m predicting this stance of yours will last until the gatewaypundit says otherwise.

Rightguide said:
I have doubted they built the Pyramids as claimed in the first place.

So you prove to be a two faced liar. Again.
 
Last edited:
I have doubted they built the Pyramids as claimed in the first place.
If the Egyptians didn’t build the Great Pyramid, how do you explain the Bent Pyramid?

The existence of a failed prototype explains the phenomenal mathematic precision of Giza. The more pyramids the Egyptians built, the better they got at it.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top