This Is Why Wikipedia Isn't Worth A Shit

[Rightguide]

Hunter Biden Used Secretive PR Firms To Put Spin On Wikipedia Pages, Emails Show​

RYAN COLLERD/AFP via Getty Images
JAMES LYNCHINVESTIGATIVE REPORTER
August 16, 20237:00 PM ET


Hunter Biden worked with public relations firms to quietly edit his personal Wikipedia entry and Ukrainian energy firm Burisma’s Wikipedia entry to make them appear more favorable, according to emails from Hunter’s laptop archive.

Biden and his business partners worked with multiple digitally focused public relations firms to change details in his Wikipedia page pertaining to his work for Burisma and his previous experience, while emphasizing his charitable work with the World Food Programme, to counter alleged falsehoods being spread online about Biden and Burisma, according to email exchanges on his laptop beginning in spring 2014.

Hunter Biden and his business associates brought in FTI Consulting to assist Burisma with its public relations strategy beginning in May 2014, after Biden was appointed to the firm’s board where he made $80,000 per month, emails from his laptop archive show.

https://dailycaller.com/2023/08/16/hunter-biden-pr-firm-spin-wikipedia-pages-emails/

Wikipedia, is just another cog in the leftwing information drivetrain.

 

[Baztrachian]

Hunter and Joe Biden suppressed the truth with the assistance of their PR firms.

 

[ll74]

Who cares? Anyone can edit their own Wikipedia page as they want. You have literally said that wikipedia isn't reliable as a source.

 

[schism666]

oh good. i thought vetteman died as we haven't had a new hunter thread by the twerp in the last 2 days.

 

[schism666]

Who cares? Anyone can edit their own Wikipedia page as they want. You have literally said that wikipedia isn't reliable as a source.

this means that he'll never source wiki again and every post of his ever with a wiki source is invalid, yes?

 

[ll74]

this means that he'll never source wiki again and every post of his ever with a wiki source is invalid, yes?

The best part about wikipedia is that you don't have to use wikipedia in your sourcing if you use it properly because it references the sites that the information is pulled from.

That being said, who relies on Wikipedia to research Hunter Biden for anything?

 

[RoryN]

Reichguide making a thread about another info source being worthless is like the Catholic church ragging on the Boy Scouts for child abuse.

 

[ll74]

The Wikipedia page for Reichgad says that he is the CEO of God and that his IQ is 2048.

Is that correct?

 

[schism666]

he should have wiki'd his arizona fraud thread. it would have been much more factual

 

[DeluxAuto]

This is what's great about this site. Whiners come and post their crybaby marching orders and then the sane people respond with facts and truths.

I believe we're doing them a great socialist favor by educating them for free.

 

[Bray123]

So did Trump edit his Wiki page to show that his grandfather operated brothels on stolen land during the gold rush then died of the fake virus 'Spanish Flu', because this was better than the truth?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Family_of_Donald_Trump

 

[Sean Renaud]

Wikipedia isn't great on political stuff. Once you get into history and science you're generally safe. At least as safe as you'd be with a ten year old encylopedia.