This is the key to Trump's political appeal

The ONLY REASON you like him, is because he will give your country's government carte blanche in Ukraine, decrease American support for NATO, and thereby allow your country to expand it's geopolitical footprint in Europe and Asia.

Just for once, let's be honest here. Because otherwise, you honestly couldn't give a shit about who runs our government either way.
TST is Russian?
 
The ONLY REASON you like him, is because he will give your country's government carte blanche in Ukraine, decrease American support for NATO, and thereby allow your country to expand it's geopolitical footprint in Europe and Asia.
You're gonna have to expand on your assessment of Canada's role there. šŸ¤­šŸ˜„šŸ¤£
 
Not true, she ran on a platform with specific policy proposals. If you weren't aware of that, that's on you.

I am aware of them. Which is why they voted for not Harris IMO. I'm not saying I agree or disagree, just my observation.
 
They think putting him in power means bringing back the Good Old Days, when white and Christian and male and straight was the default normal for American identity, and it was possible for a white man with only a high-school education to earn a middle-class income.

Only in the minds of leftist who have no fucking clue what the right wants.
 
I am aware of them. Which is why they voted for not Harris IMO. I'm not saying I agree or disagree, just my observation.
Then you know your earlier claim - that she ran only on "I'm not Trump" is false.
Most Americans voted for Trump because the alternative was so loathsome they had no choice. It wasn't that they think Trump is some paragon of virtue, it's that they reject the abject failure of the Biden administration.
What abject failure? Inflation hit worldwide after covid, and the US did a far better job than most other countries of getting it under control. Economists said a recession couldn't be avoided, but we did avoid one. Biden proposed the biggest infrastructure improvement program in decades - if you're going to call that a failure because it didn't pass, then it certainly doesn't make any sense to vote for the party that made sure it failed.
 
Then you know your earlier claim - that she ran only on "I'm not Trump" is false.

I think it is objectively true. As it was not clear to Americans what these (flip flopping) specific policy positions were. I would agree that she did represent reasonably accurately an overall ideology, both overtly and covertly and this is what you collectively rejected as The God Emperor was far clearer about his agenda, for good or bad.

Therefore, I stand by my opinion that people voted for "not Harris".

You now have a clean sweep of the institutions, the White House, the houses and the Supreme Court. That is the reality and it will be interesting to analyse the achievements of the incoming administration as time goes by.

We do have clues from the last Trump presidency, but he will have more power this time... gonna be interesting.
 
Christian conservatives have not been skilled at choosing presidents. In 1980 they abandoned the most sincerely Christian president the United States has ever had to vote for a product of Hollywood who rarely went to church. In 2016 they reached even lower and voted for a foul mouthed, dishonest, adulterous con man.

TrumpCarter 1.jpg
 
Christian conservatives have not been skilled at choosing presidents. In 1980 they abandoned the most sincerely Christian president the United States has ever had to vote for a product of Hollywood who rarely went to church. In 2016 they reached even lower and voted for a foul mouthed, dishonest, adulterous con man.

View attachment 2434388


We don't have to be skilled per se, we just have to do better than Democrats, and the bar is so low that foul mouthed, dishonest, adulterous, con man is liked more than what you guys offer.

Have you tried MORE shaming of men and white people?? LOL shit on the majority for their skin color and 1/2 the population for being born male some more.....MAGA needs it for 2028.
 
I think it is objectively true.
But it just isn't. A platform you didn't like or didn't understand is still a platform. At worst, she was guilty of saying she'd largely stay the course Biden had set, which really isn't a bad thing considering what a good job he did of cleaning up Trump's last mess.
As it was not clear to Americans what these (flip flopping) specific policy positions were.
Then they weren't paying attention. The information was there.
I would agree that she did represent reasonably accurately an overall ideology, both overtly and covertly and this is what you collectively rejected as The God Emperor was far clearer about his agenda, for good or bad.
Trump's agenda is to benefit himself. That's it. And he wasn't clear about anything beyond how impressed he was with his own performance last time (and he got nearly everything wrong about what had happened.)
 
Too bad the Democrats picked such shitty candidates.
I agree with you there. Early in his term President Biden should have announced that he would not run for reelection. That would have opened the 2024 Democrat primary to competition.
 
We don't have to be skilled per se, we just have to do better than Democrats, and the bar is so low that foul mouthed, dishonest, adulterous, con man is liked more than what you guys offer.

Have you tried MORE shaming of men and white people?? LOL shit on the majority for their skin color and 1/2 the population for being born male some more.....MAGA needs it for 2028.
When race and crime are the issues Republicans win. When class and the growing income gap are the issues, Democrats win.
 
When race and crime are the issues Republicans win. When class and the growing income gap are the issues, Democrats win.

2024 just shit all over that little bumper sticker slogan from 1990.

Maybe it was their publicly becoming the party of Cheney, Wall St. and Silicon Valley while telling the working class to STFU and enjoy the taste of their boots.
 
2024 just shit all over that little bumper sticker slogan from 1990.

Maybe it was their publicly becoming the party of Cheney, Wall St. and Silicon Valley while telling the working class to STFU and enjoy the taste of their boots.
Working class people do not benefit from tax cuts for the rich. They benefit from a well financed public sector of the economy paid for by high taxes on the rich and the corporations.

Any claim Trump may have had for protecting the interests of working class people ended with his support for H1B Visas and H2B Visas, and his support for Elon Musk's efforts to eliminate nearly one third of the federal budget.
 
True, because Trump supporters like myself easily see how all the negativity and claims of being 'loathsome' is completely made up BS in a desperate attempt to smear him.

This is because the left/democrats have no good record or positive ideas of their own; they got nothing to run on except 'orange man bad!'.
Beginning with the New Deal Democrats have benefited working people with minimum wage laws, laws to protect labor unions, laws to assure safe working conditions, Social Security and Medicare.
 
Working class people do not benefit from tax cuts for the rich.

"for the rich" is the leftoid lie you've accepted as the truth.

10k/yr isn't fucking rich..... even in backwater Arkansas that's POOR.


They benefit from a well financed public sector of the economy paid for by high taxes on the rich and the corporations.

Even if that were true that's only if they're actually getting something out of it.

Democrats seem to think simply handing the money over to the 1% and not getting fuckin' shit for it is the same thing as providing civil services to the public....it's not.

Any claim Trump may have had for protecting the interests of working class people ended with his support for H1B Visas and H2B Visas, and his support for Elon Musk's efforts to eliminate nearly one third of the federal budget.

With the number of those Visas being so small I don't think they are a bad thing as long as they aren't abused.

If you don't think the US government could stand to cut back on the spending a bit you're so insane you're not worth taking seriously.
 
Democrats seem to think simply handing the money over to the 1% and not getting fuckin' shit for it is the same thing as providing civil services to the public....it's not.
That's the exact opposite of what we think. Even for you, this is...I mean, is there a typo in there somewhere? Did you mean to write something else?
 
That's the exact opposite of what we think.

LOL no it's not...that's why you're the (D)ick Cheney party now.

Even for you, this is...I mean, is there a typo in there somewhere? Did you mean to write something else?

No. You yourself know it's true.

Ya'll just want to set other peoples shit on fire and FUCK AMERICA, that's all you fucking scum bags are.

Domestic fuckin' enemies of the USA.... a fucking cancer.
 
You truly are a one-trick pony. Absolutely everything boils down to "YOU HATE AMERICA!!!!!!111111!!!!"
But just so this doesn't pass unnoticed by anyone else:
Democrats seem to think simply handing the money over to the 1% and not getting fuckin' shit for it is the same thing as providing civil services to the public....it's not.
No. Democrats believe simply handing the money over to the 1% and not getting fuckin' shit for it is the opposite of providing civil services to the public, and we support the latter. Always have.
 
Back
Top