There's hope in the world yet ...

BlackShanglan

Silver-Tongued Papist
Joined
Jul 7, 2004
Posts
16,888
What touched me most were the comments from the 70-year-old Saudi man at the end: "I want to bring my wife." There's hope in the world yet.

-- Shanglan



Saudis vote in historic election
Local issues dominate voter concerns in first election
Thursday, February 10, 2005 Posted: 6:06 PM EST (2306 GMT)

RIYADH, Saudi Arabia (AP) -- Abdul Rahman al-Hussein voted for the candidate pledging to build playgrounds. Another man picked the candidate pushing affordable housing. Local concerns held sway as Saudi men cast city council ballots Thursday in the first regular election in their country's history.

Saudis gingerly went through the seven-page ballot card, smiling broadly as they cast their votes and made plans to frame their green voter registration cards. Many said the novel experience was a good first step toward democratic reform in this absolute monarchy -- but should be followed by more.

"This is the beginning of a new era. We now know what elections are, and what it means to make your voice heard through proper channels," said Abdul Nasser al-Zahrani, 46, an archaeology professor. "It is the beginning of democracy."

Voting began slowly at 8 a.m., the beginning of the two-day Saudi weekend, but the pace picked up later in the day, especially in lower-income areas. Women were kept away, banned from either running in the elections or voting.

Officials opened the tall, gray ballot boxes to make sure they were empty before sealing them. The smell of incense wafted through some polling stations as voters ticked off the names of their candidates.

Some had to be shepherded through the voting. Others complained to officials about voters chatting on cell phones in violation of voting rules. One enthusiastic voter made a V-for-victory sign as he got his ballot card.

More than 1,800 candidates were contesting 127 seats in the capital and surrounding villages, with 640 of them running for seven seats in Riyadh. Two more phases will cover the rest of the country in March and April.

Only half of almost 1,200 councilmen nationwide will be elected. The rest will be appointed. While many see the vote as a modest step, others see it as a remarkable development in a country where any talk of public participation in decision-making once was taboo.

Asked how he felt about the election, especially since it gave some power to citizens his family has ruled for decades, Prince Mohammed bin Saud said: "We believe in these reforms and we're going in the right direction."

The kingdom came under international pressure to reform after the September 11, 2001, attacks, carried out by 19 Arabs, 15 of them Saudi. Some progressive Saudis have blamed the lack of democracy for the prevalence of a puritanical Islamic ideology in which militants can easily find justification for their actions.

Prince Mansour bin Miteb, head of the election commission, said voter turnout was "very reasonable" shortly before polls closed at 5 p.m. Final results are not expected until Friday or Saturday.

Only 149,000 of 600,000 eligible voters registered to vote.

With so many candidates, it was not clear who would have the advantage: Wealthy businessmen who poured millions into campaigns, or fundamentalist Muslim candidates who enjoy credibility and a reputation for honesty among many Saudis.

Sultan al-Ghunaimi, a 27-year-old cleric, said he voted for seven Islamist candidates because in their campaign they promised "to serve Muslims with honesty."

Saad Tlass, a 47-year-old merchant, said he favored candidates who promised to work on legislation that would allow citizens to add extra floors to their houses.

"That would bring rents down and make it affordable for men to get married," he said.

Others said they didn't care about the candidates' affiliations so long as they fulfilled promises to improve street lighting, get rid of the stench of sewage in some areas and decrease bureaucracy.

Some voters, like Mansour al-Omar, a 40-year-old businessman, brought their sons with them. Al-Omar said he wanted to teach 6-year-old son Ibrahim about democracy.

Prince Turki, the Saudi ambassador to Britain, predicted late last month that women would be allowed to vote in future elections. Voters on Thursday seemed divided over the issue.

Al-Ghunaimi said he would support women voting on issues that concern them, such as female shopping malls and charities.

"Sewage and lighting are none of their business," he said.

Abdullah al-Muhaidib, 43, an auditor, said he would not have allowed his wife to vote even if the government had permitted it. "She is a queen at home, but I am in charge of what takes place outside the house," he said.

However, many, like Abdul Aziz al-Ghanam, 45, a land surveyor, said they wished women had been given the opportunity to participate.

"I would not have had a problem with my wife voting," he said.

The sight of a female reporter in a polling station confused Suleiman al-Ondus, 70. "Have you changed your mind? Are you allowing women to vote?" he asked an official. "I want to bring my wife."

When told the woman was a journalist, al-Ondus said: "I feel a lot of pain because women cannot participate in the vote."
 
BlackShanglan said:

The sight of a female reporter in a polling station confused Suleiman al-Ondus, 70. "Have you changed your mind? Are you allowing women to vote?" he asked an official. "I want to bring my wife."

When told the woman was a journalist, al-Ondus said: "I feel a lot of pain because women cannot participate in the vote."

:heart:
 
Funny the Saudis managed their first elections without a donation of freedom and liberty from Bush & Co..

Sorry. I'm still bitter.
 
A democratic election that excludes the female half of the population is tyranny with a face-lift.

Edited to add: As an international public relations move, it's working nicely. Just imagine the fallout if a country announced it was holding its first democratic elections and excluding non-white citizens. You wouldn't hear Laura Bush, for example, saying what a shame it is that not everyone could vote, but "still it's great to see democracy taking hold." Is it?
 
Last edited:
BlackShanglan said:

Al-Ghunaimi said he would support women voting on issues that concern them, such as female shopping malls and charities.

"Sewage and lighting are none of their business," he said.


Guess some things never change. :rolleyes:
 
Our enemies rule us best when they leave us unable to celebrate a genuine joy and victory.

Minsue, those were the lines that moved me. It's good to know that a decent heart can overcome even ingrained privilege and oppression.

Shanglan
 
shereads said:
A democratic election that excludes the female half of the population is tyranny with a face-lift.

It's a substantial improvement on zero. If we can't make the whole journey in a single leap, we're foolish to denigrate the individual steps that take us there. Personally, I was cheered that they found several men, including one quite elderly man, who were strongly sympathetic to having the vote extended to women, and soon.

Shanglan
 
Prince who now?

Prince Turki?? Tee. Tee hee. Tee hee hee.


Love-Princess Cranberries
 
BlackShanglan said:
It's a substantial improvement on zero. If we can't make the whole journey in a single leap, we're foolish to denigrate the individual steps that take us there. Personally, I was cheered that they found several men, including one quite elderly man, who were strongly sympathetic to having the vote extended to women, and soon.

Shanglan
I wish I could think of it as a glass half-full, Shanglan. But that's more difficult when you have an allegiance to the ones who got the empty half.

As a woman I can't see this election as in any way different than if, say, Germany announced that they'd be lowering the voting age by two years except for Jews. I can't imagine that anyone would celebrate the broadening of enfranchisement if that were the case.

What if horses hadn't been allowed to vote? After all they've done for the Saudis, beginning with Lawrence of Arabia? You'd be ticked off, wouldn't you?

Edited to add: I think our enemies rule us best when we celebrate a cruelly discriminatory process and agree to call it democracy.
 
Last edited:
shereads said:
I wish I could think of it as a glass half-full, Shanglan. But that's more difficult when you have an allegiance to the ones who got the empty half.

As a woman I can't see this election as in any way different than if, say, Germany announced that they'd be lowering the voting age by two years except for Jews. I can't imagine that anyone would celebrate the broadening of enfranchisement if that were the case.

What if horses hadn't been allowed to vote? After all they've done for the Saudis, beginning with Lawrence of Arabia? You'd be ticked off, wouldn't you?

Shanglan's not saying it's perfect by any means, SR. It's a start. Just as, IMO, elections here were a step in the right direction long before suffrage and still aren't perfect now.
 
I'm inclined to believe it's a good sign, reguardless of the flaws. the magna Carta was a first step down a a long road from Absolutist rule to constitutional monarchy. The Saudis are just as absolutest, so a vote, even for positions as unimposing as city council, are significant.
 
You know, I'd always had a big adversion to the fact that we're trying to force our government on so many countries. Yes, I know there are problems with how many of those countries are run, but there are most certainly problems with our own, too.
What we're raised to see as cruelty stems from thousands of years of history. I won't say that they haven't gone too far in quite a few instances...they have. Is there a country that hasn't?
I suppose it's coming from Art History...we're studying that area now. Hardness and cruelty were often the only means of survival then. Yet there is so much of beauty that's come from that part of the world, as well.
I'm just worried. What will happen to all that amazing history, so much of which we haven't even found, if their own traditions are buried under democracy?
 
minsue said:
Shanglan's not saying it's perfect by any means, SR. It's a start. Just as, IMO, elections here were a step in the right direction long before suffrage and still aren't perfect now.

What she said, really. To put it to something familiar - reading historically, I think it was a major advance when the British lifted the Penal Laws in Ireland, even when Catholics were still heavily oppressed and unable to participate in much of the governing of their country. Despite the fact that things needed to go further, I think it was an important step foreward. Similarly, although none of the Northern Irish peace agreements made thus far goes to the end goal, I think the talks vital and extremely important. Every small step brings us closer to the goal.

Every step closer is something. In fact it may be everything. Without England's first Reform Bill that enfranchised those with some property, there might never have been enough representation of middle and lower class interests to pass the second Reform Bill some decades later. Was it fair for those without ten pounds income yearly to remain disefranchised? No. (And of course women didn't get the vote for generations). But was it a victory that a new class of people did get the vote, and that they could begin to affect further change?

I have to say yes.

Interestingly, I remember having this sort of conversation with a charming and well-read colleague in a crappy job. He was an African-American, and we were discussing the poem "Booker T. and W. E. B." I was intrigued that he took the Booker T. position. He felt that things might have gone more smoothly and in the end better for everyone if they'd gone a little more slowly. It may be that waiting five years for people to adjust their narrow field of view is better than having blood and riots today.

The most painful sacrifice we can make sometimes is patience. But at times it must be made.

Shanglan
 
brightlyiburn said:
I'm just worried. What will happen to all that amazing history, so much of which we haven't even found, if their own traditions are buried under democracy?

The oppression of women is a tradition I would gladly see buried.
 
shereads said:
A democratic election that excludes the female half of the population is tyranny with a face-lift.

Edited to add: As an international public relations move, it's working nicely. Just imagine the fallout if a country announced it was holding its first democratic elections and excluding non-white citizens. You wouldn't hear Laura Bush, for example, saying what a shame it is that not everyone could vote, but "still it's great to see democracy taking hold." Is it?

It's certainly a step in the right direction and more democratic than the first elections in "The land of the free and the home of the brave." In those elections, only male property owners were given the franchise.
 
LadyJeanne said:
The oppression of women is a tradition I would gladly see buried.

that tradition will die even harder than segregation here in the U.S. It's too deeply ingrained and too many profit from it.
 
LadyJeanne said:
The oppression of women is a tradition I would gladly see buried.

That's a corruption, not a tradition. Women were not usually considered quite equals, however they were still generally respected and revered. Moreso the further back you go. This abuse, however, was not common.
You know, they're starting to find some evidence that the people who built the pyramids were not slaves at all, but rather well treated commoners. So, you know, a lot of first impressions about what went on back then could be off.
 
LadyJeanne said:
The oppression of women is a tradition I would gladly see buried.

Agreed. Right up there with bear-baiting and colonization on the list of "charming habits we'd all do best to drop."

Sorry, brightly. It's hard for me to see reverence in forcibly restricting someone's movements, voting, finances, and dress.

Shanglan
 
BlackShanglan said:
Agreed. Right up there with bear-baiting and colonization on the list of "charming habits we'd all do best to drop."

Sorry, brightly. It's hard for me to see reverence in forcibly restricting someone's movements, voting, finances, and dress.

Shanglan

Well, considering that there wasn't any voting back then anyway, it wouldn't have mattered.
But I am talking a few thousand years back here, at the very least. Things have obviously changed quite a bit since then.
 
I am silenced by my ignorance of the state of events a few thousand years ago (wouldn't that be before Islam?) and the entrancing eroticism of your AV. Is that picture from somewhere online?

Shanglan
 
BlackShanglan said:
I am silenced by my ignorance of the state of events a few thousand years ago (wouldn't that be before Islam?) and the entrancing eroticism of your AV. Is that picture from somewhere online?

Shanglan

Depends on how you look at it. Technically, yes. But even before Islam, that area of the world (Iraq, Iran, Israel, Egypt, Lebanon, and so on) was harsh. Ancient Sumer, Akkad, Mesopatamia...that's where they were. Ironically enough, civilization sprang up from most Iraq and Iran. Although they weren't called that back then.
(Considering how much of this stuff I've been reading in the last couple of weeks, I had best damn well know these things, or I'm in trouble).

I did get the picture online. I believe I found it on www.imagenetion.com

I'm waiting until my artist's hand gets better and she can draw again. Then I'll get her to make me an AV. Although I suppose I could use one of the hot naked guys she's already drawn for me, but I'd rather not give the impression that I'm a guy. And she's only really drawn one of my female characters so far. Not naked, so that's no fun.
 
Colleen Thomas said:
It's too deeply ingrained and too many profit from it.

Thanks in no small part to the Western world's unhealthy addiction to petroleum.

Oh, and the evidence that the pyramids were built by free commoners is substantial. They've done a lot of archaeology around the pyramids and found the villages the workers lived in, along with some of their graffiti and I believe even things like ration lists. The slave idea comes from old misconceptions that the Hebrews built the pyramids, but it's over 1000 years off.

Nice to see you studying this stuff, Brightly. :)
 
minsue said:
Shanglan's not saying it's perfect by any means, SR. It's a start. Just as, IMO, elections here were a step in the right direction long before suffrage and still aren't perfect now.
Well I want something to be perfect, dammit! I want I want I want.

Oops. Did I say that out loud?
 
Back
Top