There is nothing wrong with nationalism.

Nationalism -- in its classic form, as it emerged in Europe in the early 19th Century -- is the idea that every nation -- defined as a group of people of shared language and culture (and, in some versions, blood kinship)
That's another thing: Classic nationalism always included Jews out. French Jews were not really French, German Jews were not really German -- they were everywhere a separate nation, one with no territory of its own.

That provoked the emergence of Zionism. Some Jews got to thinking, "If we're a nation with no territory, we'd better get some!"
 
The definition you cite shows the problem in your premise. If all nations adopted nationalism then they’d be an awful lot of conflict and fighting
You mean like there constantly is with all the globalist liberal democracies right now??

LOL :D (y)

At least with nationalism my government is for me and not everyone else first.
 
The radical blaze the trail and make a clearing in the wilderness.

The progressives build the cabins.

The liberals move in after the showers have been installed.
Progressives don't build shit....that's why they need the government to go take other peoples shit to feed/house/cloth all the progressives.
 
You mean like there constantly is with all the globalist liberal democracies right now??

LOL :D (y)

At least with nationalism my government is for me and not everyone else first.
You'll notice there is no longer any fighting between the nations that -- at some cost to their national sovereignty -- have joined the European Union. And these are countries that have been fighting almost continually since the Roman Empire fell.

The nations still belligerent -- Russia, China, Iran, Saudi Arabia -- are not "globalist liberal democracies."

Take a lesson from that.
 
Progressives don't build shit....that's why they need the government to go take other peoples shit to feed/house/cloth all the progressives.
President Musk and the other guy are both Nepo babies who have never built shit.
 
Progressives don't build shit....that's why they need the government to go take other peoples shit to feed/house/cloth all the progressives.
Progressives built all the New Deal and Great Society programs -- the country would be shit without those.
 
Those were liberals, not progressives.
Whatever you call them, they were not what you are. They were lefty collectivist communitarians. That's the kind it takes to get anything done worth doing, which Tea Party/MAGA RW populist nationalists never have and never will and never wanted to.
 
Whatever you call them, they were not what you are.

No I'm a different kind of liberal.

They were lefty collectivist communitarians.

But they were still liberals. They didn't get into the authoritarian psychopathy you and the modern leftist push for.

That's the kind it takes to get anything done worth doing, which Tea Party/MAGA RW populist nationalists never have and never will and never wanted to.
Yea and water is wet.

LOL so what??
 
You're a worthless MAGAt. There is nothing at all to distinguish you from the redhat scum.

Right because I'm a liberal and a nationalist.....that's what the redhats are.

Nothing scummy about it, at least we aren't a bunch of self loathing soy cuck commies. :D (y) (y)
 
We can tell nationalism is a bad thing, because everything the Trump Admin is doing is purportedly motivated by it.
 
There are good economic reasons to limit immigration, but barring out immigrants for the purpose of keeping a country's culture or gene-pool unchanged is pretty damned evil. Also incredibly stupid.
I'm sorry but we have completely different definitions on what "evil" is. Torturing someone is evil.
 
There are good economic reasons to limit immigration, but barring out immigrants for the purpose of keeping a country's culture or gene-pool unchanged is pretty damned evil. Also incredibly stupid.
Not to mention it would have kept at least some of Chad's family members out of the country in the first place.
 
Back
Top