lovecraft68
Bad Doggie
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2009
- Posts
- 45,654
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
yep, those would def get deleted from any lit story.
That's what I figured, but then I couldn't quite figure out the point of the excerpt. Ages are clearly stated, etc., and the rule is no underage sex, no matter the author's intent, right?
More more importantly-- if someone wanted to be insulted by them they could make legal trouble for the owners.In fact if someone could be aroused by them they are indeed disturbed.
In looking through these posts I realized that I left out a very important detail.
First of all the "bot" picks up ages as numbers and red flags. This is why you see the occasional rejection for something like saying that "I was driving a twelve year old car" and Bronze age's infamous "Fifteen year old scotch" rejection.
So knowing that I put the ages in because again there is no sneaking here I wanted them to see it. Everyone here can plainly see the scenes are bold as brass.
The point I left out was that I included a note in the box in each story saying that I am aware of the content and it is in there not for arousal, but for a plot device and character development. This is something that Pilot and several others who have been here for years have suggested people do in lieu of a rejection or the potential of one.
When these stories cleared, my assumption was that they were looked at and it was decided to let them go as is. The ironic thing is never once on either did I receive a comment or e-mail saying anyone had an issue.
I am also unconcerned with them "getting in trouble" as there is much worse all over the site and they ignore it when people report them, so whose fault is this?
Is this against the rules? Of course it is and I tossed it to their "mercy" they put them up.
Their pulling them is within their rights. But it has become increasingly obvious here that the enforcement of their "rules" is not based on straight up right and wrong, but who the "offender" as well as who the complainant is.
At the end of the day, I am as straight of a shooter as you will ever meet and those stories were bold faced straight shots. They let them up and someone with a bug up their ass about me reported them.
So they said "Bad LC!" not "our bad" for letting them slip in to begin with.
In looking through these posts I realized that I left out a very important detail.
First of all the "bot" picks up ages as numbers and red flags. This is why you see the occasional rejection for something like saying that "I was driving a twelve year old car" and Bronze age's infamous "Fifteen year old scotch" rejection.
I am also unconcerned with them "getting in trouble" as there is much worse all over the site and they ignore it when people report them, so whose fault is this?
Is this against the rules? Of course it is and I tossed it to their "mercy" they put them up.
Their pulling them is within their rights. But it has become increasingly obvious here that the enforcement of their "rules" is not based on straight up right and wrong, but who the "offender" as well as who the complainant is.