The TRUTH emerges, his chances are NILL!

[busybody..]

Racist!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Typical paranoid COLORED 'person'

the veneer is gone

he is an ugly racist


Barack Obama's "Racial Obsessions"
Here’s a piece on Barack Obama’s past, based on his own account of his shockingly racist anti-white attitudes, in a biography written before he entered politics: ‘Trapped between two worlds’.

After his sophomore year, Obama transferred to Columbia University. Later, looking back on his years in New York City, he recalled: “I had grown accustomed, everywhere, to suspicions between the races.”

His pessimism about race relations seemed to pervade his worldview.

“The emotion between the races could never be pure,” he laments in “Dreams.” “Even love was tarnished by the desire to find in the other some element that was missing in ourselves. Whether we sought out our demons or salvation, the other race would always remain just that: menacing, alien, and apart.”

After graduating from college, Obama eventually went to Chicago to interview for a job as a community organizer. His racial attitudes came into play as he sized up the man who would become his boss. “There was something about him that made me wary,” Obama wrote. “A little too sure of himself, maybe. And white.”

Harris-Lacewell said such expressions of distrust toward whites will not hurt Obama in the Democratic presidential primaries, which are dominated by liberal voters.

“To win the Democratic nomination, he’s got to get a part of the progressive, anti-war, white folks,” she said. “And those white folks tend to be suspicious of any black person who wouldn’t be suspicious of white people.”

Wow.

 

[busybody..]

After graduating from college, Obama eventually went to Chicago to interview for a job as a community organizer. His racial attitudes came into play as he sized up the man who would become his boss. “There was something about him that made me wary,” Obama wrote. “A little too sure of himself, maybe. And white.”

Harris-Lacewell said such expressions of distrust toward whites will not hurt Obama in the Democratic presidential primaries, which are dominated by liberal voters.

“To win the Democratic nomination, he’s got to get a part of the progressive, anti-war, white folks,” she said. “And those white folks tend to be suspicious of any black person who wouldn’t be suspicious of white people.”

Wow.


Obama wrote. “A little too sure of himself, maybe. And white.”


“And those white folks tend to be suspicious of any black person who wouldn’t be suspicious of white people.”

 

[Ulaven_Demorte]

Beating a dead horse Busybooty.

That entire piece of garbage has been discredited already. Do you know what hearsay is?

 

[busybody..]

BS, UD


Its all FACT

The FAT BITCH is intertwined with Wal Mart, and he runs against THEM as well

BS!

 

[busybody..]

UD


Your CLEAN and GOOD LOOKING

COLORED "man" is for CENSORSHIP!



Charles Schumer and Barack Obama plan to introduce a bill today in the Senate that will impose more regulation on political speech during campaigns in order to end "deceptive" practices. The New York Times editorial board enthusiastically supports this new bill, even though it admits that the one abuse most often associated with this effort can be prosecuted under existing law.


It's all about protecting incumbents. It always is.

 

[Sean]

Its all FACT

The FAT BITCH is intertwined with Wal Mart, and he runs against THEM as well

BS!

You can't even read the bullshit lies you post.
Not even that lying blog claimed she was linked with Wal Mart, dumbass.

 

[busybody..]

Nonsense

MUSLIMHussein and BURKAH wearing MRSMUSLIMHussein

are CROOKS and THIEVES


and


RACISTS!

 

[Ulaven_Demorte]

UD


Your CLEAN and GOOD LOOKING

COLORED "man" is for CENSORSHIP!



Charles Schumer and Barack Obama plan to introduce a bill today in the Senate that will impose more regulation on political speech during campaigns in order to end "deceptive" practices. The New York Times editorial board enthusiastically supports this new bill, even though it admits that the one abuse most often associated with this effort can be prosecuted under existing law.


It's all about protecting incumbents. It always is.

It's all about stopping bullshit stories like the ones you're posting in this thread.

You have a problem with making it illegal for politicians to spread blatent lies about political opponents?

 

[busybody..]

free speech applies to ONLY SOME THINGS?
Are YOU not the one who screams when Bush and Cheney kept some people OUT form a PRIVATE event?

 

[Sean]

It's all about stopping bullshit stories like the ones you're posting in this thread.

You have a problem with making it illegal to spread blatent lies about political opponents?

Of course he has a problem with it. What else would he post if it were banned?

 

[busybody..]

LIBS running scared

Know the days of MUSLIMHussein is numbered!


He and his "wife" are as crooked as john HAIDO edwards



Has ANYONE actually SEEN the MUSLIM's marriage certificate?

or are they living in sin?

 

[Ulaven_Demorte]

LIBS running scared

Know the days of MUSLIMHussein is numbered!


He and his "wife" are as crooked as john HAIDO edwards



Has ANYONE actually SEEN the MUSLIM's marriage certificate?

or are they living in sin?

Now you're just being more stupid than usual.

 

[busybody..]

So YOU have seen it?

Are they LIVING is SIN or not?

I havent seen it, show me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!










































I know, you take thing way too seriously!

 

[Ulaven_Demorte]

free speech applies to ONLY SOME THINGS?
Are YOU not the one who screams when Bush and Cheney kept some people OUT form a PRIVATE event?

Free speech does not protect libel or slander.

 

[busybody..]

If it is either

When will MUSLIMHussein sue?

Has he denied any of it?

 

[busybody..]

Bill I WANNA FUCK EVERYONE Clitman

and MUSLIMHussein

two pees in a pondhttp://web.mit.edu/errhode/Public/winston-pees.gif


Obama and Bill Clinton


Ruth Marcus in the Washington Post finds that Obama is a lot like Bill Clinton. After all, they are both black, aren't they?

But they share another quality - the desire to make it seem like they agree with everyone.

Obama is like Bill Clinton in his natural ease with people and his ability to win them over. A New York Times story about Obama's law school days described how Obama "cast himself as an eager listener, sometimes giving warring classmates the impression that he agreed with all of them at once." As they debated whether to use the term "black" or "African-American," "students on each side of the debate thought he was endorsing their side," the story said. " 'Everyone was nodding, Oh, he agrees with me,' " said professor Charles Ogletree.

Sounds like everyone who's ever emerged from a meeting with Bill Clinton.
Such a quality might gain you more friends and lubricate your way through life. But at some point you have to stand up for what you believe. And like Marcus, I'm waiting to see the one time when Obama is willing to take a political risk and take a position that goes against his base. So far he's succeeded by saying soothing things and then taking typical liberal positions. Just a liberal guy armed with platitudes and an intriguing personal story. Is that all it takes?

 

[Ulaven_Demorte]

If it is either

When will MUSLIMHussein sue?

Has he denied any of it?

The majority of it has already been debunked as misinformation. You're beating a dead horse, and an imaginary one of your own making.

Like your little Obamatruth.org site.

 

[busybody..]

a contra viewpoint

is not a DEBUNKING

 

[Ulaven_Demorte]

a contra viewpoint

is not a DEBUNKING

Not a differing viewpoint, just the facts that were left out of everything from that site.

 

[busybody..]

I actually read both

I really didnt see it as a debunking

just a different spin

ASSUMING that the debunking site is ACCURATE!

 

[busybody..]

True and worth noting — all of it — from a friend who knows these issues well (all of 'em):

Very good piece on Obama. I read his books at your suggestion. He could make a difference regarding the black fatherhood message. Having read his books, however, it’s strikingly clear that this isn’t a man comfortable in his own skin. It’s not clear he’s gotten beyond his struggles with being black and raised by a white mother. Lots of unresolved issues there. In the end, he’s the most liberal candidate in the field other than Kucinich. His actions don’t comport with the rhetoric.

 

[busybody..]

some letters to the editors



Isn’t there another possible reading of Biden’s comment that could be interpreted as offensive to Blacks? I mean, the fact that, in Biden’s estimatiion, Democrats have been able to somehow muster an “African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy” is the stuff of “storybooks”? As if to say, “How were they able to pull off such an improbable feat?” That was my initial inference, and I’m not of the easily offended ilk.

BTW, Biden might add Alan Keyes to the list of the unwashed and uneducated.

And another:


Love your work, but justed wanted to make a quick correction:

If we're going to be partisan, we should do it fairly. Biden said that Obama was "articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy." Failing any one of those requirements would make any contender pale in comparison. All Biden is claiming is that Sharpton and Jackson are either filthy, ugly or dim-witted. Or any two of the three. Or possibly all three. But not necessarily all three.

But I wouldn't expect someone who watches Top Chef to make that distinction
(Watch The Dresden Files)



And another:

Based on you post, one must assume that, in your opinion, Jesse Jackson, Allen Keyes, and Al Sharpton were “Not Bright”, “Not Clean”, and/or “Not Nice Looking”. Would you care to elaborate on either your opinion, in this regard, or speculate on Sen. Biden’s intent. I don’t really see how this comment from the senator is excusable.

And another:

You started out right in your remarks concerning Biden. But then you ended with, “Biden is calling Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton filthy, ugly, and dim-witted.” And as a fan of yours, I think it’s wrong of you to jump to that conclusion.

Biden could easily have been saying Obama is simply the first mainstream African-American candidate to run for President on the Democrat side. And that Obama is also an “articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy.”

He might also think Jackson were articulate, bright, clean, and nice looking, but that they weren’t mainstream candidates. And they weren’t, by Democrat standards.

Think it over.


And another:

I actually assumed he meant to include the word "candidate." That doesn't change anything. Where does he get the word "clean"? And "articulate" is usually considered a racial code word, at least by the Left when a conservative uses it.
If this were Trent Lott, he'd be resigning write now — "candidate" or not.

 

[Peregrinator]

WooHootyTootyFruity's affairs.

Pro-Gun Control.

Pro-Choice.

Pro-Gay.

BizzyBonnet has to dredge up whatever dirt he can. The sickened prostate he has his nose against is a hopeless early frontrunner.

 

[Sean]

I actually read both

I really didnt see it as a debunking

just a different spin

ASSUMING that the debunking site is ACCURATE!

How can it not be a debunking???
And where is she involved with Wal mart?

 

[Ulaven_Demorte]

I actually read both

I really didnt see it as a debunking

just a different spin

ASSUMING that the debunking site is ACCURATE!

The site you referenced used half-truths to try to paint a bad picture. This is typical of most of the shit you C&P here. The site I referenced pointed out exactly that.

No spin, just the truth.