sweetsub4u
Virgin
- Joined
- May 29, 2012
- Posts
- 28
...
.....
.....
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I always loved it-- but like my writing much betterStory of submission, it was a love letter from the author to the man she desired. I'm just curious if anyone has read it and what your take on it is.
Story of submission, it was a love letter from the author to the man she desired. I'm just curious if anyone has read it and what your take on it is.
Story of submission, it was a love letter from the author to the man she desired. I'm just curious if anyone has read it and what your take on it is.
I read it in the mid 70's and loved it. Still have it on the bookshelf, though a bit more worn now. There were parts which I didn't enjoy as much as others, but still think it was worth the time. Didn't think the movie was worth seeing though.
Catalina![]()
Yeah, I've read it close to ten-ish years ago. I managed to finally finish it maybe on my third or fourth attempt, and even then I mostly read it just because I just have to finish all books I start. I'm weird that way. To me it was boring and unrealistic, I couldn't find most anything to identify with in it.
But then again I'm not a huge fan of erotic fiction in general, let alone BDSM fiction.
I don't know what I was expecting when I first read it, but I certainly was not expecting to feel so non-plussed about it. It left me feeling nothing but meh-ness(ok, so not really a word, but you get what I mean, I hope).
I'll probably keep the book, maybe re-read it to see if I maybe missed it's point.........either that or I'll line the pusslekittens litter tray with the pages *shrug*
I thought the movie was extremely boring
BDSM wasn't even a word back when O was written, and most of the wonderful things we do hadn't been thought of yet either.
Also, we expect more interior life from our heroines in our writing these days... Regiere included more thoughts than most porn writers did at the time, but it's still a bit paltry
BDSM was not a word in 1954.You are joking right?
"O" is a relatively recent book.
BDSM is not a word now, and thing s not thought of?
Have you read any really old erotica or pillow books?
Everything old is new again!
BDSM was not a word in 1954.
People might have said "sadomasochism"when talking about whipping, forced sex, what we would now call "imprisonment play," but what we do, and how we think about what we do under the BDSM umbrella has only developed since the late seventies, and really only flowered in the nineties, forty years after O was written.
Not to mention piercing.![]()
Sure, it's a word. It's a set of phonemes that means something. It's in my mouth almost daily, just like all the other words I use.BDSM is it not a word now either!
I don't agree, I would say that some groups are more open about what they do, but it is not new. There is also more access to public information.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BDSM#History
What a beautiful post.I loved it. Read it 20 years ago, when I didn't have any clarity about all these crazy feelings centered around these dirty dirty things I wanted to do and have done to me that made me feel more true to me.
I recall a section where O was at Anne-Marie's, tied spread eagle to columns. O realized she'd be going back to Stephen even more open than ever. It was my Oprah-bdsm-aha! moment. I still think about that. Ways to be more open, not just physically but in my submission. I know, I know -- kind of maudlin. I'll be quoting Anais Nin real soon.
'O' put those feelings in focus and (as much as I dislike this cliche) the book started my journey of understanding service, submission, suffering and honestly, just enjoying "that kind" of sex.