dmallord
Humble Hobbit
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2020
- Posts
- 4,886
Fair enough—you’ve named past presidents with flaws. No one’s pretending American history is full of saints. But there’s a difference between being a flawed politician and being someone who shows open contempt for decency, service, and sacrifice.I think the USA has had lots of Presidents of low character.
Some very likable rascals!
Clinton, George W and Trump, for example.
You just dont like trump.
Rightguard didn’t like biden.
So what? Get over yourself!
Lol
You mentioned Clinton and George W. Sure, they had their scandals and misjudgments. But did either of them mock disabled people on stage? Call POWs "losers"? Praise dictators? Should wounded veterans be kept out of sight? Encourage political violence? Not to mention the use of primarying opponents and arm-twisting the judicial system, as in calling out the National Guard or the use of the US Marines in an unprecedented manner.
Here’s what concerns me: When we start excusing behavior just because someone happens to be president, we’ve flipped the standard on its head. The office is supposed to demand more character, not less. Serving as president isn’t a shield from moral accountability—it’s supposed to be a reason for it.
And now, with the Supreme Court ruling that a president has broad immunity for actions taken as part of their official duties, the stakes are even higher. If the legal system won’t always hold a president accountable, then character becomes the last safeguard. We’re placing enormous unchecked power in the hands of a person we hope has the judgment not to abuse it. That’s not a partisan issue—it’s a civic one.