The Seditious Ring Leader in the senate is finally asked the hard questions.

[DeluxAuto]

This is what you're supporting, idiots.

https://www.reddit.com/r/EyesOnIce/s/SFxYyzYfhS

A white woman being threatened on her own damn property.

 

[Rightguide]

We Now Have a Website That Pushes Military Insurrection​

By
M Dowling

November 27, 2025

Tim Pool found a website that promotes military insurrection. The website gives the military tips on how best to do it in secret. Elissa Slotkin and her five buddies, who recently made an insurrection video, say they will have their backs, when of course they won’t.

Democrats are emboldened and they see timidity and evasiveness in the DoJ and FBI. They are going to keep promoting rebellion as they have among populations such as antifa, illegal aliens and misguided, ill-informed Americans.

Infesting the military, knowing many are Democrats, is very dangerous to our nation.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1993778476802035766

https://www.independentsentinel.com/we-now-have-a-website-that-pushes-military-insurrection/

 

[Hel_Books]

If you tell members of the military that they shouldn't obey illegal orders and someone tells you not to say that, it stands to reason that that someone wants to be able to give the military illegal orders.

 

[Chadrone]

This is what you're supporting, idiots.

https://www.reddit.com/r/EyesOnIce/s/SFxYyzYfhS

A white woman being threatened on her own damn property.

We don't care if she's white you guys are the race obsesses bigots, there is no such thing as her own damn property AND she's an insurectionist.

She should be deported with the illegals she's fighting for.

It's hard being on the WRONG SIDE OF DEMOCRACY....

 

[Chadrone]

We Now Have a Website That Pushes Military Insurrection​

By
M Dowling

November 27, 2025

Tim Pool found a website that promotes military insurrection. The website gives the military tips on how best to do it in secret. Elissa Slotkin and her five buddies, who recently made an insurrection video, say they will have their backs, when of course they won’t.

Democrats are emboldened and they see timidity and evasiveness in the DoJ and FBI. They are going to keep promoting rebellion as they have among populations such as antifa, illegal aliens and misguided, ill-informed Americans.

Infesting the military, knowing many are Democrats, is very dangerous to our nation.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1993778476802035766

https://www.independentsentinel.com/we-now-have-a-website-that-pushes-military-insurrection/

If the right continues to allow this, and they almost certainly will, they deserve it.

 

[ll74]

We Now Have a Website That Pushes Military Insurrection​

By
M Dowling

November 27, 2025

Tim Pool found a website that promotes military insurrection. The website gives the military tips on how best to do it in secret. Elissa Slotkin and her five buddies, who recently made an insurrection video, say they will have their backs, when of course they won’t.

Democrats are emboldened and they see timidity and evasiveness in the DoJ and FBI. They are going to keep promoting rebellion as they have among populations such as antifa, illegal aliens and misguided, ill-informed Americans.

Infesting the military, knowing many are Democrats, is very dangerous to our nation.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1993778476802035766

https://www.independentsentinel.com/we-now-have-a-website-that-pushes-military-insurrection/

We have websites that promote lots of things.

The UK cracks down on this.

I've seen a few threads here that don't appreciate that....so do you or don't you?

 

[HumpDayHoratio]

Apparently you weren't paying attention, so here it is again:

. . . Trump has repeatedly proposed doing things – with the military and otherwise – that appear to be illegal. People who served with him have said he suggested illegal action. And Trump is certainly testing the bounds of the law with his use of the military even as we speak.

The big example right now is Trump’s strikes on alleged drug vessels in the Caribbean Sea and the Pacific Ocean – strikes that have killed more than 80 people without a legal process. . . .

CNN has reported that both the United Nations and top allies like the United Kingdom regard the strikes as illegal extrajudicial killings. Republican Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky has echoed those claims, while other GOP senators have questioned their legality as well. The administration has also declined to publicly detail its legal justification, even as the Justice Department has produced a classified legal opinion authorizing the strikes. It has released survivors of the strikes who, if they had been kept in US custody, could have forced it to defend itself in court. Also, a top commander who CNN has reported raised questions about the legality of the strikes is now retiring early.

There is a very real question about whether the servicemembers involved in those strikes are carrying out illegal orders. And the administration has proactively avoided a more robust legal process that could settle that question.

But that’s hardly all. Here are some other key data points:

During the 2016 campaign, Trump floated having the military torture people and kill terrorists’ families. When it was posited that troops would not follow such illegal orders, Trump responded: “If I say do it, they’re gonna do it.” (He later backed off, saying he would not order people to violate international law.)

In 2020, Trump told Iran that the United States was prepared to strike Iranian cultural sites, which would likely have been considered a war crime if carried out.

In 2018, Trump’s first secretary of state, Rex Tillerson, said publicly after his departure that Trump had repeatedly tried to do illegal things.

In 2019, Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen resigned after clashing with Trump over his repeated desires to do things she thought might be illegal.

Former Trump Defense Secretary Mark Esper has said Trump in 2020 floated having the military shoot racial-justice protesters demonstrating near the White House in the legs.

A series of judges this year have indicated the administration has flouted or violated court orders with its deportations or its use of the National Guard on domestic soil.

Those National Guard deployments represent an extraordinary use of the military, the legality of which is still being sorted out in courtrooms across the country.

You still haven’t named an illegal order. I don’t give a fuck what the British or CNN think. You’re conflating what you WISH President Trump would do as opposed to what President Trump HAS done.

Try harder.

 

[ll74]

You still haven’t named an illegal order. I don’t give a fuck what the British or CNN think. You’re conflating what you WISH President Trump would do as opposed to what President Trump HAS done.

Try harder.

So there hasn't been an illegal order.

The statement was not to obey illegal orders.
.neat

 

[HumpDayHoratio]

Fuck that bone spur having pedo and the drunk TV host he rode in on.

View attachment 2579979

Benedict Arnold was once held in high esteem also. These fucking Seditious Six have blood all over their hands in light of you Killer Piggies recent activities.

 

[HumpDayHoratio]

So there hasn't been an illegal order.

The statement was not to obey illegal orders.
.neat

Nice pivot. I’ve explained it all upstream. That you still don’t understand is…not surprising. It has come to light there was another video. The cat was let out of the bag by a foul mouthed CO congressman nobody has ever heard of.

Ask yourself. Why hasn’t that been released?

 

[ll74]

Nice pivot.

Statement of facts is a pivot?
Fun.

I’ve explained it all upstream. That you still don’t understand is…not surprising. It has come to light there was another video. The cat was let out of the bag by a foul mouthed CO congressman nobody has ever heard of.

I get your spin.
It's fun
You actually explained how no illegal orders have been issued and therefore nothing they said was invalid.

Ask yourself. Why hasn’t that been released?

I bet you a comet pizza that you have an answer!

 

[Rebel5soul]

Apparently you weren't paying attention, so here it is again:

. . . Trump has repeatedly proposed doing things – with the military and otherwise – that appear to be illegal. People who served with him have said he suggested illegal action. And Trump is certainly testing the bounds of the law with his use of the military even as we speak.

The big example right now is Trump’s strikes on alleged drug vessels in the Caribbean Sea and the Pacific Ocean – strikes that have killed more than 80 people without a legal process. . . .

CNN has reported that both the United Nations and top allies like the United Kingdom regard the strikes as illegal extrajudicial killings. Republican Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky has echoed those claims, while other GOP senators have questioned their legality as well. The administration has also declined to publicly detail its legal justification, even as the Justice Department has produced a classified legal opinion authorizing the strikes. It has released survivors of the strikes who, if they had been kept in US custody, could have forced it to defend itself in court. Also, a top commander who CNN has reported raised questions about the legality of the strikes is now retiring early.

There is a very real question about whether the servicemembers involved in those strikes are carrying out illegal orders. And the administration has proactively avoided a more robust legal process that could settle that question.

But that’s hardly all. Here are some other key data points:

During the 2016 campaign, Trump floated having the military torture people and kill terrorists’ families. When it was posited that troops would not follow such illegal orders, Trump responded: “If I say do it, they’re gonna do it.” (He later backed off, saying he would not order people to violate international law.)

In 2020, Trump told Iran that the United States was prepared to strike Iranian cultural sites, which would likely have been considered a war crime if carried out.

In 2018, Trump’s first secretary of state, Rex Tillerson, said publicly after his departure that Trump had repeatedly tried to do illegal things.

In 2019, Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen resigned after clashing with Trump over his repeated desires to do things she thought might be illegal.

Former Trump Defense Secretary Mark Esper has said Trump in 2020 floated having the military shoot racial-justice protesters demonstrating near the White House in the legs.

A series of judges this year have indicated the administration has flouted or violated court orders with its deportations or its use of the National Guard on domestic soil.

Those National Guard deployments represent an extraordinary use of the military, the legality of which is still being sorted out in courtrooms across the country.

You can puke out more useless shit than damn near anyone else on the board.

Key words. Alleged, overturned inferior court rulings, unsupported opinions.

 

[ll74]

You can puke out more useless shit than damn near anyone else on the board.

Key words. Alleged, overturned inferior court rulings, unsupported opinions.

And yet you think the Comey case has merit.
Lol

 

[Rightguide]

You actually explained how no illegal orders have been issued and therefore nothing they said was invalid.

The whole point of their endeavor was to imply that illegal orders were being given to sow discord in the ranks of the military and undermine the duly elected President.

 

[ll74]

The whole point of their endeavor was to imply that illegal orders were being given to sow discord in the ranks of the military and undermine the duly elected President.

Lol

How many officers refused legal orders as a result?

 

[DeluxAuto]

Benedict Arnold was once held in high esteem also. These fucking Seditious Six have blood all over their hands in light of you Killer Piggies recent activities.

You're a histrionic illiterate muppet.

 

[DeluxAuto]

We don't care if she's white you guys are the race obsesses bigots, there is no such thing as her own damn property AND she's an insurectionist.

She should be deported with the illegals she's fighting for.

It's hard being on the WRONG SIDE OF DEMOCRACY....

You fell out of the Stupid Tree and hit every branch on the way down.

 

[Chadrone]

Lol

How many officers refused legal orders as a result?

Doesn't matter.

 

[Chadrone]

You fell out of the Stupid Tree and hit every branch on the way down.

I understand you can't actually argue against what I said.

 

[ll74]

Doesn't matter.

Lol

Correct.

We agree on something.

 

[DeluxAuto]

I understand you can't actually argue against what I said.

You're a crazy person.

 

[Rightguide]

Benedict Arnold was once held in high esteem also. These fucking Seditious Six have blood all over their hands in light of you Killer Piggies recent activities.

He was a highly decorated war hero. Unlike Captain Kelly, he probably knew how to wear his decorations.

 

[Chadrone]

You're a crazy person.

Deflective ad hom.......thanks for proving what I said.

 

[DeluxAuto]

Deflective ad hom.......thanks for proving what I said.

You deny reality, create your own, and then ask sane people to argue with you about your fantasy, where you can obviously never be wrong.

 

[Chadrone]

You deny reality, create your own, and then ask sane people to argue with you about your fantasy, where you can obviously never be wrong.

I've been wrong.

I don't deny reality or create my own.

I ask you to back up your bullshit.....and you never do.