The Republican Debates

[unregistered]

 

[busybody..]

He brought up the word "recession" not CONTRACTION. I asked him if he even knows what one is. Do you?

yes

its a negative GDP growth for 3 quarters, I think

what would you do with Iran?

 

[jhuson]

yes

its a negative GDP growth for 3 quarters, I think

what would you do with Iran?

It's 2 consecutive quarters actually.

What does it have to do with Iran? Nothing. But I'm not the one that brought Iran up.

Ask that person why they brought up the imaginary "recession".

 

[Le Jacquelope]

Probably because they didn't want to give anyone in England an inferiority complex.

Actually it's because they didn't want to scare any more little boys...

 

[hogjack]

Republicans attacking Democrats? yeah,right.
Democrats have had their hands around Bush's throat since November 8,2000 and have only tightened their grip since then.ZERO support on Iraq,blaming him for Katrina...nevermind that the state has been a DEM stronghold since the Civil War.Where's all the hoopla about the DOW? It's better than Clinton on Wall Street and he was touted as MIDAS for the dot.com bonanza.Then it popped and it became Bush's fault.Jeezis the DEMS were blaming Bush for the (slight) recession before he became president.Get fuckin real.

Busybody's cousin semen4her?

 

[subwannabe]

Anyway, point being, they'll stop at nothing to bring us down, especially when we've been "meddling" in affairs that they think we ought not to be meddling in.

My point exactly. I believe many of the Democrats and other liberals (I guess that's democrats too) who just want to pull out of the war think that this will appease the terrorists and we can just live on happily ever after. I hate war, I hate the losing of soldiers and civilians, but, we lost over 3000 lives on 911 and we weren't at war with anyone or doing any Muslims any harm. But, we are an enemy to the radicals and probably some moderates too, for supporting Israel and "meddling" in Middle East affairs. We could pull every last soldier out of Iraq and we will only be back to square one - the terrorists planning more 911's, but even worse this time. And, all of their energies will be used toward attacks on US or English soil, as upposed to in Iraq. I say let the terrorists make Iraq their battle ground.

 

[busybody..]

It's 2 consecutive quarters actually.

What does it have to do with Iran? Nothing. But I'm not the one that brought Iran up.

Ask that person why they brought up the imaginary "recession".

I ask YOU

as a DUMOH spokesperson

How DARE they say we are in the worst economy since Hoover?


I ask about Iran, cause

of your earlier comment

read up on what you wrote

 

[Sean]

Btw, is this true?

Asked by CNN's Wolf Blitzer what use he would make of ex-president Bush if he became president, congressman Tom Tancredo of Colorado said Mr Bush would never darken the doorstep of the White House again.

 

[Ulaven_Demorte]

My point exactly. I believe many of the Democrats and other liberals (I guess that's democrats too) who just want to pull out of the war think that this will appease the terrorists and we can just live on happily ever after. I hate war, I hate the losing of soldiers and civilians, but, we lost over 3000 lives on 911 and we weren't at war with anyone or doing any Muslims any harm. But, we are an enemy to the radicals and probably some moderates too, for supporting Israel and "meddling" in Middle East affairs. We could pull every last soldier out of Iraq and we will only be back to square one - the terrorists planning more 911's, but even worse this time. And, all of their energies will be used toward attacks on US or English soil, as upposed to in Iraq. I say let the terrorists make Iraq their battle ground.

The terrorists didn't make Iraq the battleground. We did. Did anyone ask the Iraqis first if they wanted us to decimate their country and turn it into a breeding ground for radical terrorists?

We lost ~3000 lives on 9/11, over 3000 soldiers so far in Iraq. How many Iraqi civilians have been maimed and killed because we decided to make their country the battleground in the War on Terror? Estimates are between 65,000 and 71,000 civilians.

The assertion that "We're fighting them there so we don't have to fight them here" is fallacious. Little has been done since 9/11 to safeguard our borders, Airports are still notoriously unsecure. If they wanted to strike here again, there is little in place to stop them. So, we're to keep them "busy" in Iraq indefinitely then? Are the Iraqi people up for their country being a permanent war zone?

 

[Ulaven_Demorte]

Btw, is this true?

Apparently after Tancredo made some comment criticizing president Bush the Vice President informed him that he was never to darken the doorstep of the White House.

 

[busybody..]

So PENISMAN

Here we have Iran KILLING AMERICANS

and about to get NUKES to kill MILLIONS more

what would YOU do?


Document: Iran Caught Red-Handed Shipping Arms to Taliban
June 06, 2007 6:00 PM

Brian Ross and Christopher Isham Report:

NATO officials say they have caught Iran red-handed, shipping heavy arms, C4 explosives and advanced roadside bombs to the Taliban for use against NATO forces, in what the officials say is a dramatic escalation of Iran's proxy war against the United States and Great Britain.

"It is inconceivable that it is anyone other than the Iranian government that's doing it," said former White House counterterrorism official Richard Clarke, an ABC News consultant.

Secretary of Defense Robert Gates stopped short earlier this week of blaming Iran, saying the U.S. did not have evidence "of the involvement of the Iranian government in support of the Taliban."

But an analysis by a senior coalition official, obtained by the Blotter on ABCNews.com, concludes there is clear evidence of Iran's involvement.

"This is part of a considered policy," says the analysis, "rather than the result of low-level corruption and weapons smuggling."

Iran and the Taliban had been fierce enemies when the Taliban was in power in Afghanistan, and their apparent collaboration came as a surprise to some in the intelligence community.

"I think their goal is to make it very clear that Iran has the capability to make life worse for the United States on a variety of fronts," said Seth Jones of the Rand Institute, "even if they have to do some business with a group that has historically been their enemy."

The coalition analysis says munitions recovered in two Iranian convoys, on April 11 and May 3, had "clear indications that they originated in Iran. Some were identical to Iranian supplied goods previously discovered in Iraq."

The April convoy was tracked from Iran into Helmand province and led a fierce firefight that destroyed one vehicle, according to the official analysis. A second vehicle was reportedly found to contain small arms ammunition, mortar rounds and more than 650 pounds of C4 demolition charges.

A second convoy of two vehicles was spotted on May 3 and led to the capture of five occupants and the seizure of RPG-7mm rockets and more than 1,000 pounds of C4, the analysis says.

Also among the munitions are components for the lethal EFPs, or explosive formed projectiles, the roadside bombs that U.S. officials say Iran has provided to Iraqi insurgents with deadly results.

"These clearly have the hallmarks of the Iranian Revolution Guards' Quds force," said Jones.

The coalition diplomatic message says the demolition charges "contained the same fake U.S. markings found on explosives recovered from insurgents operating in the Baghdad area."

"We believe these intercepted munitions are part of a much bigger flow of support from Iran to the Taliban," the message says.

The Taliban receives larger supplies of weapons through profits from opium dealing, officials say, but the Iranian presence could be significant.

"It means the insurgency in Afghanistan is likely to be prolonged," said Jones. "It would be a much more potent force."

 

[busybody..]

PenisMAN

I ask YOU

cause of what you said here


Originally Posted by busybody

the NK talk loudly

the NK's can be talked to

the NK's dont have a death wish

Iran WANTS to be bombed as it brings about their REDEMTION

Iran has said often, even if 20 million of em DIE, there are a BILLION MooseShits left, so they see it as a WIN

So you are saying we should attack NK cause they have said they WILL NUKE/ATTACK us

That means that since Iran says the same, often, we should attack em NOW before they have NUKES


WHY NOT?

YOU RESPONDED!

LOL. Nice backpedal, BB.

 

[subwannabe]

Ulaven: No, we didn't ask the Iraqi's first before we invaded. Saddam would have probably said no. There are many Iraqi's who were thrilled that we took out Saddam and his cronies. Yes, it is a breeding ground for terrorists but then we arrested scores of terrorists around the world before we even invaded Iraq. We didn't invade Iraq to get Al Qadia, we invaded Iraq to get Saddam and his regime. It is Al Qadia who came to Iraq to fight us. They made it a battleground for terrorism, not us. The original plan was just to get Saddam and his regime, rebuild, and leave. It didn't work out that way. The terrorists have succeeded in not letting us complete our original plan.

Yes, we have lost 3000 of our soldiers in Iraq and countless Iraqi civilians. Yes, we outright killed some civilians ourselves but the majority have been killed by their own people, the radical terrorists.

"The assertion that "We're fighting them there so we don't have to fight them here" is fallacious." I don't understand that whole paragraph. The fact is there have been no terrorist acts on US soil since the Iraq war. That is evidenced by your own words that we are vulnerable. That just proves my point that even though we are still vulnerable, there have been no attacks since the war started, so obviously, WE ARE keeping them busy over there. If we have to do it indefinetly, then we have to do whatever makes our borders safe. Hopefully we can do it in as short as time as possible.

I find it amazing that none of you on that side ever talk about Afghanistan. The only difference in Afghanistan and Iraq is that the terrorists have succeeded in Iraq where they didn't have time to fight us in Afghanistan. I don't hear any of you saying it was a mistake to invade Afghanistan and that we should pull our troops out. Unfortunately, war can be a bloody business, especially when we aren't currently winning and the squeemish would rather run up the white flag when things aren't going well rather than stick it out until we do win. If we can't win then the future is bleak for us all.

This whole thing reminds me of the days when armys just stood in a line and fired at each other. When they tried doing that with the Indians, the Indians shook their heads in disbelief and laughed at us. We need to learn how to fight the Indians again because they are hiding behind trees and we are back to just standing in a line again.

 

[busybody..]

Sub

Great post

You will find such clarity and sagacity is lost on LIT!

 

[jhuson]

PenisMAN

I ask YOU

cause of what you said here


Originally Posted by busybody

the NK talk loudly

the NK's can be talked to

the NK's dont have a death wish

Iran WANTS to be bombed as it brings about their REDEMTION

Iran has said often, even if 20 million of em DIE, there are a BILLION MooseShits left, so they see it as a WIN

So you are saying we should attack NK cause they have said they WILL NUKE/ATTACK us

That means that since Iran says the same, often, we should attack em NOW before they have NUKES


WHY NOT?

YOU RESPONDED!

LOL. Nice backpedal, BB.

BB, you posted this:

"there is ONE difference between NK and Iran

NK has NOT threatened SEVERAL CUNTRIES with destruction

Iran has and will"

And you had your ass handed to you by UD so you backpedaled. I commented and now you are angry (you're still mad that my PP is substantially larger than yours too but I can't help that....that is what therapy and penis extensions are for).

So now you ask me about Iran...makes sense. LOL.

Firstly, Iran wouldn't be the problem it is right now if it weren't for our presence in Iraq. Iran knows they can play pissant games with us because our idiotic exploits in Iraq has our military stretched and occupied.

Secondly, we cannot just bomb Tehran because:
a. We don't know where the nuclear sites are.
b. We'd be putting our troops in even more danger in Iraq.

That being said, do you now UNDERSTAND WHY IRAQ WAS SUCH A STUPID FUCKING IDEA? They weren't a real threat...meanwhile, Iran is looking more and more like a real threat. CAN YOU RETARDS GET THAT THROUGH YOUR EMPTY FUCKING HEADS?

So what do we do?

Our options are limited thanks to Bush and co. (have I made it clear just how bad an idea Iraq was?)

Why don't we just have Israel bomb them? Is this your idea?

 

[busybody..]

I asked what YOUR idea is!

Oh

and yes, Iran was SAINTLY before Iraq

 

[busybody..]

I asked what YOUR idea is!

Oh

and yes, Iran was SAINTLY before Iraq

You musta read TIME Ragazine

They also BLAME all the BAD from Iran on us!


The Iranians Aren't Responsible For Anything; We Always Incite Them

In the Blame America First Department, I give you this headline from Time magazine:

Did the U.S. Incite Iran's Crackdown?

Yes, everything is always our fault, even the actions of Iran's mullahs. Apparently it's blowback for Americans' repeated mispronunciations of "Ahmedinijad."

 

[jhuson]

You musta read TIME Ragazine

They also BLAME all the BAD from Iran on us!


The Iranians Aren't Responsible For Anything; We Always Incite Them

In the Blame America First Department, I give you this headline from Time magazine:

Did the U.S. Incite Iran's Crackdown?

Yes, everything is always our fault, even the actions of Iran's mullahs. Apparently it's blowback for Americans' repeated mispronunciations of "Ahmedinijad."

LOL God you are an idiot. Learn how to read and quit trying ti misstate people's posts to fit your pre-conceived (and crazy) notions.

I am blaming our inability to actually confront Iran on our folly in Iraq.

Now what is your plan? Israel?

I'll tell you one of the few viable options we have after you reveal your brilliant strategy.

 

[busybody..]

I say let Iran have nukes and let em nuke EuroPUKE


Now

1- Why did the DUMZ say we are in the WORST economy since Hoover, since we have had NO contraction

2- What would YOU do about Iran?

 

[jhuson]

I say let Iran have nukes and let em nuke EuroPUKE


Now

1- Why did the DUMZ say we are in the WORST economy since Hoover, since we have had NO contraction

2- What would YOU do about Iran?

1. How should I know. Ask the Dems.

2. Let them bomb Europe (both the band and the continent).

 

[busybody..]

1. How should I know. Ask the Dems.

2. Let them bomb Europe (both the band and the continent).

1- I axe you, cause you axed why the poster said recession. PLUS. You are THE chief spokesDICK for the DUMZ

2- Ok, after they nuke EuroPUKE. What would you do if anything?

 

[jhuson]

1- I axe you, cause you axed why the poster said recession. PLUS. You are THE chief spokesDICK for the DUMZ

2- Ok, after they nuke EuroPUKE. What would you do if anything?

1. Holy shit. You absolutely make no sense at all. ROTFLMAO.

2. Probably jerk off a little.

 

[Saint Boner]

Tell us more about Jesus, repubicans.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v460/xonvaldez/god.jpg