The Recidiva sex offender disconnect

[ms_ann_thrope]

[edited]

[Discussions and/or accusations involving pedophilia and/or child sex abuse prohibited per our forum guidelines.]

 

[PoppingTom]

The problem here is that Eeyore The One Who Is Respected By Smoothie II believes this is something we all should care about.

And yes, this is me in the avatar.

 

[DesEsseintes]

No. The message is important, not the messenger.

 

[ms_ann_thrope]

The problem here is that Eeyore The One Who Is Respected By Smoothie II believes this is something we all should care about.

You can't think for yourself? That could be a huge problem.

 

[PoppingTom]

You can't think for yourself? That could be a huge problem.

Don't worry. I'm socialist.

 

[ms_ann_thrope]

No. The message is important, not the messenger.

That is only true if you receive the message. Messengers risk their lives daily. Reconsider your frivolous response.

 

[ms_ann_thrope]

Don't worry. I'm socialist.

You have to be plugged in first?

 

[Recidiva]

Yes, that is my picture. Took it today.

 

[DesEsseintes]

That is only true if you receive the message. Messengers risk their lives daily. Reconsider your frivolous response.

It wasn't frivolous - goodness knows eyer and I don't get on, but what matters is what he is making clear, and not the fact that it is he who is saying it. I was disagreeing with Mr Scat here.

 

[PoppingTom]

You have to be plugged in first?

I think I....better ask somebody....

 

[ms_ann_thrope]

I think I....better ask somebody....

Hey now....that was funny.

 

[bg23]

No. The message is important, not the messenger.

this is why quoting is important

 

[Lancecastor]

I think you should start a new thread to clarify and enhance.

 

[ms_ann_thrope]

I think you should start a new thread to clarify and enhance.

Maybe I'll start a thread about women and poles.

 

[lemonbread]

Is the problem here that you all don't believe that she had sex with a minor as an adult woman or is it you don't care that she had sex with a minor as an adult woman? These are two distinct issues , or they would be if she hadn't said so in so many words.

And OMG is that her picture in her avatar?

I normally dont get into these types of arguments, but I think weather or not something like that was abuse, regardless of the legality, has everything to with the maturity levels of both partners and whether or not one was coerced or had less power in the relationship, and nothing to do with a physical age gap.

If neither partner was harmed emotionally or physically, the only wrongdoing was if anything done was actually illegal. In my state at least, one can consent to many sexual activities at 15 or 16, so even that question is still up in the air as far as we as outsiders can determine. We were not there. We saw nothing. We know nothing.

We'd have to talk to all of the individuals involved to even come close to any kind of solid argument either way. Maybe we'd best leave it alone before we get ourselves banned though, hm?

 

[bg23]

Nobody is going to get banned for asking questions.

 

[lemonbread]

As far as i'm aware, even mentioning certain things in passing is an affront to the rules around these parts. Whether it's stated in question form or not. A logical discussion in certain terms is probably permissible, I'm just saying getting carried away with it is probably a bad idea.

 

[Recidiva]

As far as i'm aware, even mentioning certain things in passing is an affront to the rules around these parts. Whether it's stated in question form or not. A logical discussion in certain terms is probably permissible, I'm just saying getting carried away with it is probably a bad idea.

This is true. My original comment was removed because it implied something.

Comments will be removed if it involves situations, so that's the limit there.

Just...don't imply a situation happened and all is well.

 

[Que]

As far as i'm aware, even mentioning certain things in passing is an affront to the rules around these parts. Whether it's stated in question form or not. A logical discussion in certain terms is probably permissible, I'm just saying getting carried away with it is probably a bad idea.

That is a sexy turn of phrase. One does not hear "affront" in context nearly enough.

Makes me want to commit an affront on you, LB. (workin' on my creepy cred)

 

[bg23]

As far as i'm aware, even mentioning certain things in passing is an affront to the rules around these parts. Whether it's stated in question form or not. A logical discussion in certain terms is probably permissible, I'm just saying getting carried away with it is probably a bad idea.

Your awareness doesn't stretch very far.

Like I said, questions don't get you banned.

 

[lemonbread]

Your awareness doesn't stretch very far.

Like I said, questions don't get you banned.

And apparently your grasp of present vs. future tense doesn't either.

I wasn't saying anything that has already been said is a bannable offense, but by the tone of recent arguments it might be wise to tone it down. It's a perfectly reasonable statement considering the topic of discussion and the way others are going about it.

That is a sexy turn of phrase. One does not hear "affront" in context nearly enough.

Makes me want to commit an affront on you, LB. (workin' on my creepy cred)

Well, remind me to use my strong vocabulary skillz more often.

 

[lovecraft68]

I normally dont get into these types of arguments, but I think weather or not something like that was abuse, regardless of the legality, has everything to with the maturity levels of both partners and whether or not one was coerced or had less power in the relationship, and nothing to do with a physical age gap.

If neither partner was harmed emotionally or physically, the only wrongdoing was if anything done was actually illegal. In my state at least, one can consent to many sexual activities at 15 or 16, so even that question is still up in the air as far as we as outsiders can determine. We were not there. We saw nothing. We know nothing.

We'd have to talk to all of the individuals involved to even come close to any kind of solid argument either way. Maybe we'd best leave it alone before we get ourselves banned though, hm?

But if the same half dozen or so people who keep beating this like a dead horse listened to your logic....they would have to....find someone else to harass and bully

16 is age of consent in just about every state and I doubt this "victim" was traumatized. Hmmm 16 and some fooling around with an older woman, oh no male that age would want that

The term pedo does not apply here. Pedo's molest children (and 16/age of consent means this was not a child) in fact pedo's usually want them very young.

But why would that definition mean anything here? After all, Eyer, the misogynistic sexual harassing meat sack needs someone to try to use as a way for others to act like they agree with him so he can feel part of things.

This is what's wrong with the internet, a bunch of mob mentality running around yammering away on things they have no proof of.

But seeing people talk about this as if it were a crime...defamation of character is a crime, cyber bullying is a crime, cyber stalking is a crime

Again with silly facts.

 

[Recidiva]

But if the same half dozen or so people who keep beating this like a dead horse listened to your logic....they would have to....find someone else to harass and bully

16 is age of consent in just about every state and I doubt this "victim" was traumatized. Hmmm 16 and some fooling around with an older woman, oh no male that age would want that

The term pedo does not apply here. Pedo's molest children (and 16/age of consent means this was not a child) in fact pedo's usually want them very young.

But why would that definition mean anything here? After all, Eyer, the misogynistic sexual harassing meat sack needs someone to try to use as a way for others to act like they agree with him so he can feel part of things.

This is what's wrong with the internet, a bunch of mob mentality running around yammering away on things they have no proof of.

But seeing people talk about this as if it were a crime...defamation of character is a crime, cyber bullying is a crime, cyber stalking is a crime

Again with silly facts.

I figure if he's bugging me he's not bugging someone else who might actually give a damn about his opinion.

 

[eyer]

Read:

Recidiva the Proud Sex Offender Thread

 

[Ulaven_Demorte]

I see Ms_Ann_Troll and Eyer the Liar are busy STILL trying to gather the villagers. Not so many takers in the pitchfork and torch lines huh?