The Radicalized knew, and they didn’t give a damn

HumpDayHoratio

Slightly Aged
Joined
Jul 18, 2022
Posts
8,294
The Epstein Dinner Party the Media Wants You To Forget

Jeffrey Epstein didn’t just “know people.”

He hosted a full-blown dinner party in honor of Prince Andrew—inside his $75 MILLION Upper East Side mansion, the same mansion authorities later found trafficking evidence in—and the guest list reads like a who’s who of the American Left’s elite.

But here’s the part that should make your jaw drop:
-This wasn’t before his arrest.
-This wasn’t before the world “knew who he was.”
-This was 2010–seventeen months after he walked out of prison for procuring a minor for prostitution and solicitation of a minor.

And yet the media royalty strutted into his townhouse as if nothing happened.

Here’s the guest list:

Katie Couric—the ABC News “journalist”
George Stephanopoulos—Clinton operative turned ABC host.
Charlie Rose—later taken down by how own sexual misconduct scandal.
Chelsea Handler—foul mouthed late-night “comedian”
Woody Allen—who showed up with Soon-Yi because apparently the Upper East Side is just “neighborly,” (and fellow travelers with the younger set…Woody was alleged by his ex-wife of molesting their adopted 7 yr old daughter…the courts didn’t charge him. Soon-Yi was alleged to have had relations with Woody in High School…again, he wasn’t charged)

After the story resurfaced, Couric actually tried to justify it:

Weil, I didn’t know anything about him…a lot of stuff hadn’t come out yet…
Absolutely not.

She was a national journalist. She worked at ABC News—the same ABC News that Killed the Amy Roback scoop on Epstein three years earlier.

She knew, They all knew, but they went anyway. Because the rules don’t apply to the elite. Especially not if they’re on the Left and protected by the right circles. (They have Information Dominance, so don’t fear being exposed)

This is why the media bends over backward to bury these stories.
This is why the Epstein client list is still sealed.
This is why every “conspiracy theory” about the powerful ends up being true 18 months later.

The same people who demand moral purity from you were dining with a convicted child predator. (All, every single one, a Registered Democrat…to include Epstein)

They didn’t boycott him. They didn’t condemn him.

They RSVP’d.

The__Republican__veteran originally posted this on Instagram

(Parentheses are my additions)
 
The Epstein Dinner Party the Media Wants You To Forget

Jeffrey Epstein didn’t just “know people.”

He hosted a full-blown dinner party in honor of Prince Andrew—inside his $75 MILLION Upper East Side mansion, the same mansion authorities later found trafficking evidence in—and the guest list reads like a who’s who of the American Left’s elite.

But here’s the part that should make your jaw drop:
-This wasn’t before his arrest.
-This wasn’t before the world “knew who he was.”
-This was 2010–seventeen months after he walked out of prison for procuring a minor for prostitution and solicitation of a minor.

And yet the media royalty strutted into his townhouse as if nothing happened.

Here’s the guest list:

Katie Couric—the ABC News “journalist”
George Stephanopoulos—Clinton operative turned ABC host.
Charlie Rose—later taken down by how own sexual misconduct scandal.
Chelsea Handler—foul mouthed late-night “comedian”
Woody Allen—who showed up with Soon-Yi because apparently the Upper East Side is just “neighborly,” (and fellow travelers with the younger set…Woody was alleged by his ex-wife of molesting their adopted 7 yr old daughter…the courts didn’t charge him. Soon-Yi was alleged to have had relations with Woody in High School…again, he wasn’t charged)

After the story resurfaced, Couric actually tried to justify it:

Weil, I didn’t know anything about him…a lot of stuff hadn’t come out yet…
Absolutely not.

She was a national journalist. She worked at ABC News—the same ABC News that Killed the Amy Roback scoop on Epstein three years earlier.

She knew, They all knew, but they went anyway. Because the rules don’t apply to the elite. Especially not if they’re on the Left and protected by the right circles. (They have Information Dominance, so don’t fear being exposed)

This is why the media bends over backward to bury these stories.
This is why the Epstein client list is still sealed.
This is why every “conspiracy theory” about the powerful ends up being true 18 months later.

The same people who demand moral purity from you were dining with a convicted child predator. (All, every single one, a Registered Democrat…to include Epstein)

They didn’t boycott him. They didn’t condemn him.

They RSVP’d.

The__Republican__veteran originally posted this on Instagram

(Parentheses are my additions)
lock them all up no matter who is guilty.

now you say it.
 
OK, so that puts trump in the clear...
It didn’t say that at all. What it proves is that the Left has been in bed, no pun intended with this subject, with Epstein for a long time.

They knew, they didn’t give a damn.

In light of the revelation of Stacy Plaskett’s collusion with Epstein in real time during a hearing for Cohen, it begs the question; what did democrats know, when did they know it (we really don’t need to ask this do we? They knew) and how many other Radicalized dimwits were in on the collusion?

I don’t know if this has legal legs but I’m guessing this is at least against house rules.

What it does show is democrats were thick as thieves with a known sex offender/trafficker. Then, later, because he could be used to take down President Trump (they thought), they forgot all about their shielding of Slick Willie.

Now, all the dirty laundry is starting to get aired. Stuff they’ve been able to keep a lid on for years. This party was in 2010…

Now the Law of Unintended Consequences is biting them in the ass.
 
The Epstein Dinner Party the Media Wants You To Forget

Woody Allen
—who showed up with Soon-Yi because apparently the Upper East Side is just “neighborly,” (and fellow travelers with the younger set…Woody was alleged by his ex-wife of molesting their adopted 7 yr old daughter…the courts didn’t charge him. Soon-Yi was alleged to have had relations with Woody in High School…again, he wasn’t charged)
So . . . Donald Trump is a pedophile like Woody Allen? Got it, check.
 
It didn’t say that at all. What it proves is that the Left has been in bed, no pun intended with this subject, with Epstein for a long time.

They knew, they didn’t give a damn.

In light of the revelation of Stacy Plaskett’s collusion with Epstein in real time during a hearing for Cohen, it begs the question; what did democrats know, when did they know it (we really don’t need to ask this do we? They knew) and how many other Radicalized dimwits were in on the collusion?

I don’t know if this has legal legs but I’m guessing this is at least against house rules.

What it does show is democrats were thick as thieves with a known sex offender/trafficker. Then, later, because he could be used to take down President Trump (they thought), they forgot all about their shielding of Slick Willie.

Now, all the dirty laundry is starting to get aired. Stuff they’ve been able to keep a lid on for years. This party was in 2010…

Now the Law of Unintended Consequences is biting them in the ass.
Epstein was trumps wedding guest in 1993, if what the files suggest holds up trump knew all along.
trump was writing his birthday book message in 2003 about shared secrets.

trump has known all about the subject way longer than your mythical radicalised democrats.
 
I’ve said it plenty. I don’t give a rats ass who gets taken out with collateral damage.

I will guarantee one thing. It will be more of YOU, than it is of US.
So far the collateral has been one prince and one Barclays Bank boss.
2-0 to the right, your guarantee doesn’t look convincing.
 
So far the collateral has been one prince and one Barclays Bank boss.
2-0 to the right, your guarantee doesn’t look convincing.
Make that 4-0 if one includes maxwell, a socialite, and bill gates whose divorce was reputedly influenced by his Epstein links.
 
It didn’t say that at all. What it proves is that the Left has been in bed, no pun intended with this subject, with Epstein for a long time.

They knew, they didn’t give a damn.

In light of the revelation of Stacy Plaskett’s collusion with Epstein in real time during a hearing for Cohen, it begs the question; what did democrats know, when did they know it (we really don’t need to ask this do we? They knew) and how many other Radicalized dimwits were in on the collusion?

I don’t know if this has legal legs but I’m guessing this is at least against house rules.

What it does show is democrats were thick as thieves with a known sex offender/trafficker. Then, later, because he could be used to take down President Trump (they thought), they forgot all about their shielding of Slick Willie.

Now, all the dirty laundry is starting to get aired. Stuff they’ve been able to keep a lid on for years. This party was in 2010…

Now the Law of Unintended Consequences is biting them in the ass.
Who cares? Let them all rot. As long as trump gets what's coming to him.
 
Who cares? Let them all rot. As long as trump gets what's coming to him.
"As long as trump gets what's coming to him."

and this here is the problem. if he is guilty, then yes, i agree with you. but no one should "get whats coming to them" just because you dont like them. this is literally the mindset that is killing the country. please use critical and fair thinking.

i would hate to have you as a juror if i was wrongfully accused of something and you decided you didnt like something about me. this is why he won, people are so sick of "orange man bad" TDS. as long as he gets in trouble, even if he shouldnt, thats all people care about.

such a dangerous mindset and why our country is in shambles.
 
i would hate to have you as a juror if i was wrongfully accused of something and you decided you didnt like something about me. this is why he won, people are so sick of "orange man bad" TDS. as long as he gets in trouble, even if he shouldnt, thats all people care about.
People want the rule of law restoring.
 
So far the collateral has been one prince and one Barclays Bank boss.
2-0 to the right, your guarantee doesn’t look convincing.
So, two Brits. Neither one is “right” if I’m picking up what you’re laying down. When heads roll for the American’s we’ll talk.
 
Epstein was trumps wedding guest in 1993, if what the files suggest holds up trump knew all along.
trump was writing his birthday book message in 2003 about shared secrets.

trump has known all about the subject way longer than your mythical radicalised democrats.
That’s a fair point. He was also a registered democrat then…

You can surely argue all day he “knew,” but as we’ve seen, the courts let him walk. How long will the statute of limitations be?
 
That’s a fair point. He was also a registered democrat then…

You can surely argue all day he “knew,” but as we’ve seen, the courts let him walk. How long will the statute of limitations be?
your cocksucking pedo pres. is fucked and not by a pornstar he has to pay off.
 
Hel_Books said:
So now you're going to claim Donald Trump didn't know Jeffrey Epstein because Trump wasn't at one particular one of the parties Epstein gave?

Got it. Check.

Where did I say that? You’re not very good at this troll thing.
You said Donald Trump was not at that party, as if that was some defence of Donald Trump's pedophile actions. If you're now claiming you weren't defending Donald Trump's pedophilia, then my prediction that you were going to make that claim was incorrect. Are you going to make that claim or not?
 
Back
Top