The Proposed Impeachment List

Rightguide

Prof Triggernometry
Joined
Feb 7, 2017
Posts
61,952
For openers:

Joe Biden
Kamala Harris
Alejandro Mayorkas
Merrick Garland
Pete Buttigieg
Jennifer M. Granholm
 
Nope just a house majority.


This is true, Republicans are fucking spinless and wouldn't DARE hold a Democrat accountable for anything.... NYT might call them racist for the 8,000th time.
It's my proposed list. I'm not holding my breath on an impending impeachment except in the case of Mayorkas, a distinct possibility.
 
I definitely urge Republicans to run on this platform.

I don't get the anger at Garland, though. The guy has been about as fierce as a geriatric sloth.
 
I definitely urge Republicans to run on this platform.

I don't get the anger at Garland, though. The guy has been about as fierce as a geriatric sloth.
Accept he doesn't enforce the law and he has lied to Congress under oath.
 
It's hard to believe that vette is a 65+ year-old man and not a mentally challenged toddler throwing multiple tantrums per day.
 
How can the GOP prosecute an impeachment in the Senate, if all their lawyers have been disbarred?
 
yeah, go ahead and impeach Biden, Harris, etc on frivilous grounds but lemme guess....you'd totally let Trump off the hook for trying to overturn an election and storm the white house, or collude with a foreign power to fix an election on his behalf. Nothing wrong with THAT at all; SURE! "Fake News! It's a Witch hunt! Trump totally has the right to overthrow the Constitution and install himself as a dictator! What do you MEAN he should be prosecuted for that! Instead we should go after Biden and Harris for, uh, I dunno, but I'll come up with something."

Your hypocrisy here is sickening, but then again, we have had more than enough of your bullshit from all six or seven of your usernames.
 
yeah, go ahead and impeach Biden, Harris, etc on frivilous grounds but lemme guess....you'd totally let Trump off the hook for trying to overturn an election and storm the white house, or collude with a foreign power to fix an election on his behalf. Nothing wrong with THAT at all; SURE! "Fake News! It's a Witch hunt! Trump totally has the right to overthrow the Constitution and install himself as a dictator! What do you MEAN he should be prosecuted for that! Instead we should go after Biden and Harris for, uh, I dunno, but I'll come up with something."

Your hypocrisy here is sickening, but then again, we have had more than enough of your bullshit from all six or seven of your usernames.

BUTT!!! BUTT!!! TRUMP!!! WAHHHH!!!!

Yes we're looking forward to being every bit as partisan and petty as you and your tribe have been. :D
 
Only if they have the votes. Impeachment with no chance of success says impotence.
 
BUTT!!! BUTT!!! TRUMP!!! WAHHHH!!!!

Yes we're looking forward to being every bit as partisan and petty as you and your tribe have been. :D
This is neither partisan nor petty.

It's a case of right and wrong, and consequences. It really is that simple.

Was it "petty" or "Partisan" to convict Tim McVeigh, a Republican whose views are oddly not that far from yours, to death for his role in the Oklahoma City bombing?

No. Believe it or not- his political party affiliation has nothing to do with it.

You commit a crime, you suffer the consequences. Nowadays, if the Oklahoma City bombing had happened today, I almost expect you and the SugardaddyGuide multi-user-name idiot to write posts DEFENDING McVeigh, or at least, offering the theory that he was a "Left Wing Agitator" or a "Government Agent Plant" who did it to "provoke gun control laws," or some such idiocy.

Was it "Partisan" or "Petty" to convict the Rosenbergs for selling atomic secrets to the Soviets? They were, after all, liberal Democrats. But NO! It was not- because what they did was treasonous- and they faced the punishment they deserved.

By arguing that it is somehow "petty" to convict Trump for his treasonous activity is not only wrong, but it downplays the seriousness of what he did. It completely misses the point: he deserves it.

When some of the people mentioned in the original post commit actual offenses on par with what McVeigh, the Rosenbergs, or Trump did, then of course, they should face justice. Because this isn't about "Liberals" or "Conservatives" or being "Woke." it's not about partisan politics- it is simple right and wrong, and facing the consequences of doing wrong. Otherwise, a civil and just society cannot exist.

One day, when you are older, I hope you can finally understand that.
 
This nonsense should do wonders in getting the Democratic vote out to put Republicans where they belong.
 
(D)ouble standard.

We're (D) the party of impeachment!
How dare you even consider it!
We impeach thee!

__________________________________________
Democrat born. Democrat bred. Libertarian led (by Democrats).
 
This nonsense should do wonders in getting the Democratic vote out to put Republicans where they belong.
Democrats always have a poor turnout for mid-terms.

No headliner, no vote.

That simple...
__________________________________________
Democrat born. Democrat bred. Libertarian led (by Democrats).
 
This is neither partisan nor petty
.It's a case of right and wrong, and consequences. It really is that simple.


You're so in denial of objective reality right here I'm not bothering with the rest of it.

Congressional pissing contests aren't partisan or petty folks... Pax sayz so!!!! LMFAO what a fucking retard.
 
I definitely urge Republicans to run on this platform.

I don't get the anger at Garland, though. The guy has been about as fierce as a geriatric sloth.
I think that's probably the reason.

A spineless director of the DOJ who lets violent criminals languish or go free isn't desirable for either political party. Garland fits the spineless DOJ director description perfectly.
 
Back
Top