We Can't Stop Here! This is Parasite Country.
Have the major media and press noticed a parasite government
has installed itself within the American government ?
The Parasite Declares That It, Itself, is America
The strange, demented logic of King Donald the Goon
Everything is his, because he embodies the country he rules.
Did The Goon forget that he is temporarily installed to do the job
that he is hired to do, for The People ?
Only Parasite Party Members Are Allowed To Hold Public Office
The Parasite seeks to rid himself of anyone in a position to oppose him-
“I don’t think it's a big problem. I don’t think it's very many people,”
Trump said during a press conference in India, adding he wants
“people who are good for the country, loyal to the country.”
-Laura Clawson
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/20...stration-but-I-don-t-think-it-s-a-big-problem
February 25, 2020 12:32 PM
Donald Trump simultaneously acknowledged the existence of a purge
list and downplayed its importance during his press conference. White House
is reportedly tracking down administration officials seen as less than 110%
loyal to Trump and replacing them with people guaranteed to go along with
all of Trump’s corruption and not just like 95% of it.
The effort is assisted by Ginni Thomas, wife of Supreme Court
Justice Clarence Thomas.
“I don’t think it's a big problem. I don’t think it's very many people,”
Trump told reporters in India, going on to claim that he wants
“people who are good for the country, loyal to the country.”
Let’s unpack this, starting with substituting “Donald Trump”
for “country” when it comes to the real requirement.
Trump slams Sotomayor and Ginsburg, says they should recuse
themselves from ‘Trump-related’ cases
https://www.washingtonpost.com/nati...-seeks-their-recusal-all-trump-related-cases/
- Martin Pengelly
The Sotomayor story is such a microcosm of where we are:
1. Fox runs a story saying she accused #SCOTUS majority of pro-Trump bias.
2. Trump amplifies Fox and demands her recusal.
3. No one actually _reads_ her 7-page dissent—which says nothing about Trump or pro-Trump bias.
February 25, 2020
In short, because Fox misrepresented Sotomayor’s words,
Trump is misrepresenting Sotomayor’s words, which means
much of the media is misrepresenting Sotomayor’s words.
Here’s a link to Sotomayor’s dissent, so you can read it for yourselves.
(link to PDF)
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news...rat-debate-modi-bernie-sanders-mike-bloomberg
Trump says RBG and Sotomayor should recuse themselves from his cases
Trump posted the tweet in an apparent reference to Sotomayor's
dissenting opinion Friday in a case enabling his administration's
"public charge" immigration rule to go into effect in which she
said the court "has been all too quick" to grant the government's
requests, but "make no mistake: Such a shift in the Court’s own
behavior comes at a cost."
https://www.axios.com/trump-sotomay...and-3bbe4da2-725a-4a95-9b4d-a229c6751ba8.html
Trump Call for Sotomayor and Ginsburg Recusals
Is Step Toward Defying Supreme Court Decision,
Says Political Analyst
- James Walker
2/25/20
U.S. Ruth Bader Ginsburg Supreme Court Donald Trump Politics
A senior political analyst said President Donald Trump's call
for two Supreme Court justices to recuse themselves from all
cases related to him was a step toward the
"perhaps inevitable moment" when he would
defy a Supreme Court decision.
Ron Brownstein of CNN speculated in a Monday night tweet
that the commander-in-chief would use perceived bias against
him as a reason to ignore a Supreme Court decision,
"especially" if he wins a second term at the November
presidential election.
The analyst made his remark after President Trump pushed
for Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ruth Bader Ginsburg to
recuse themselves from cases involving his administration
just days after Sotomayor hit out at the government for
repeatedly seeking "emergency relief" from the Supreme Court.
Posting a link to Sotomayor's dissent in the Wolf v Cook County
case on Friday, University of Texas School of Law professor
Steve Vladeck tweeted: "Here's Justice Sotomayor's actual dissent,
which accuses the majority of wrongly tipping the scales for
emergency relief in favor of the federal government—
not of pro-Trump bias.
And as I've explained at length before, she's right."
https://www.newsweek.com/trump-soto...g-supreme-court-decision-analyst-says-1488952
Have the major media and press noticed a parasite government
has installed itself within the American government ?
The Parasite Declares That It, Itself, is America
The strange, demented logic of King Donald the Goon
Everything is his, because he embodies the country he rules.
Did The Goon forget that he is temporarily installed to do the job
that he is hired to do, for The People ?
Only Parasite Party Members Are Allowed To Hold Public Office
The Parasite seeks to rid himself of anyone in a position to oppose him-
“I don’t think it's a big problem. I don’t think it's very many people,”
Trump said during a press conference in India, adding he wants
“people who are good for the country, loyal to the country.”
-Laura Clawson
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/20...stration-but-I-don-t-think-it-s-a-big-problem
February 25, 2020 12:32 PM
Donald Trump simultaneously acknowledged the existence of a purge
list and downplayed its importance during his press conference. White House
is reportedly tracking down administration officials seen as less than 110%
loyal to Trump and replacing them with people guaranteed to go along with
all of Trump’s corruption and not just like 95% of it.
The effort is assisted by Ginni Thomas, wife of Supreme Court
Justice Clarence Thomas.
“I don’t think it's a big problem. I don’t think it's very many people,”
Trump told reporters in India, going on to claim that he wants
“people who are good for the country, loyal to the country.”
Let’s unpack this, starting with substituting “Donald Trump”
for “country” when it comes to the real requirement.
Trump slams Sotomayor and Ginsburg, says they should recuse
themselves from ‘Trump-related’ cases
https://www.washingtonpost.com/nati...-seeks-their-recusal-all-trump-related-cases/
- Martin Pengelly
The Sotomayor story is such a microcosm of where we are:
1. Fox runs a story saying she accused #SCOTUS majority of pro-Trump bias.
2. Trump amplifies Fox and demands her recusal.
3. No one actually _reads_ her 7-page dissent—which says nothing about Trump or pro-Trump bias.
February 25, 2020
In short, because Fox misrepresented Sotomayor’s words,
Trump is misrepresenting Sotomayor’s words, which means
much of the media is misrepresenting Sotomayor’s words.
Here’s a link to Sotomayor’s dissent, so you can read it for yourselves.
(link to PDF)
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news...rat-debate-modi-bernie-sanders-mike-bloomberg
Trump says RBG and Sotomayor should recuse themselves from his cases
Trump posted the tweet in an apparent reference to Sotomayor's
dissenting opinion Friday in a case enabling his administration's
"public charge" immigration rule to go into effect in which she
said the court "has been all too quick" to grant the government's
requests, but "make no mistake: Such a shift in the Court’s own
behavior comes at a cost."
https://www.axios.com/trump-sotomay...and-3bbe4da2-725a-4a95-9b4d-a229c6751ba8.html
Trump Call for Sotomayor and Ginsburg Recusals
Is Step Toward Defying Supreme Court Decision,
Says Political Analyst
- James Walker
2/25/20
U.S. Ruth Bader Ginsburg Supreme Court Donald Trump Politics
A senior political analyst said President Donald Trump's call
for two Supreme Court justices to recuse themselves from all
cases related to him was a step toward the
"perhaps inevitable moment" when he would
defy a Supreme Court decision.
Ron Brownstein of CNN speculated in a Monday night tweet
that the commander-in-chief would use perceived bias against
him as a reason to ignore a Supreme Court decision,
"especially" if he wins a second term at the November
presidential election.
The analyst made his remark after President Trump pushed
for Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ruth Bader Ginsburg to
recuse themselves from cases involving his administration
just days after Sotomayor hit out at the government for
repeatedly seeking "emergency relief" from the Supreme Court.
Posting a link to Sotomayor's dissent in the Wolf v Cook County
case on Friday, University of Texas School of Law professor
Steve Vladeck tweeted: "Here's Justice Sotomayor's actual dissent,
which accuses the majority of wrongly tipping the scales for
emergency relief in favor of the federal government—
not of pro-Trump bias.
And as I've explained at length before, she's right."
https://www.newsweek.com/trump-soto...g-supreme-court-decision-analyst-says-1488952
Last edited: