The Orbit of Mars

NoJo

Happily Marred
Joined
May 19, 2002
Posts
15,398
This week I turned fifty. In a panic, I called my oldest friend John, who, when we met as eighteen-year-old university undergrads, was three months older than me, and older than me he remains after all these years. His fiftieth year was an annus horribilis punctuated by death, deceit and divorce. Mine was a stumbling series of impulsive decisions, fluttering resolutions made and broken in a day, like mayflies splattered against the windshield of car driven under the Influence.

“Remember”, he reminded me, as I had reminded him once, “you write your own story.”

John is a tutor at a film school in Cornwall, and a film cameraman. A few years back, he and I tried to pitch my film script “The Orbit of Mars”. After a year or so, I ran out of steam and money, and went back to being a part-time wedding musician and freelance software writer, dejected and dazed by the effort of maintaining a delusional state for so long.

The Orbit Of Mars was written in a year-long period of mourning for the death of my father, a commercially successful writer of television drama. Actually I began it two weeks before his death. I wept most nights that year, as The Orbit Of Mars erupted from me, red-hot and seething.

After it was completed, I entered it in a screenwriting competition. It won. With my £1,000 prize money, I decided I could call myself a professional. (Hah fucking hah.)

The Story of The Orbit of Mars is the story of the two 16th century astronomers Tycho de Brahe and Johann Kepler, whose relationship reminded me of my own relationship with my father.

I committed the beginner’s error: I put way too much of everything into the story, producing a dense cacophony of clashing themes and characters. The language in which my characters spoke was harsh, filthy and violent, closer to the East End of London than Reformation Prague. I was suffering from a kind of literary Tourette’s Syndrome while writing it.

I was unhinged, in the grip of wild delusion. Luckily, I was living alone in a rented flat. It was the top floor of above a shop in Muswell Hill, and my little office overlooked London. In summer, I stared at the white-and-yellow glaring dawn from there, sipping Absinthe and puzzling over Kepler. In November I watched the firework display playing against the black night sky over Alexandra Park. The rockets reminded me of Kepler’s dream, a real dream, where he was fired off in a cannon to the moon, Méliès-style. Throughout the time I was working on the script, I was Kepler. I dreamed his dreams. Oh, I was in the grip alright.

After a year I returned to my family. I quit Goldman Sachs, I knew I would never return to the city. Goldman Sachs had allowed me to save enough money to rent that beautiful apartment in Muswell Hill, to get away from everyone, where I could deal with the rage engendered by all those years working at Goldman Sachs.

So what is The Orbit Of Mars about? Why the title? It’s about the efforts we go to in finding meaning and purpose in our chaotic life. See, Mars’ orbit is very unpredictable and “wobbly” – it was an intractable problem to try and explain and predict it in the 16th century, until Kepler came along with his laws of planetary motion. The great drive for Kepler was to look to the heavens as a place of harmony and order, a haven and an escape from the utter chaos into which his life had been plunged. It was not just upsetting to Kepler that Mars seemed to be literally capricious and malevolent in its motion, it implied that God himself allowed evil and disorder to pollute the heavens, the way war, chaos and pestilence dominated the lives of 16th century Europeans.

Kepler was a poor man, a son of pig-farmer, a mathematical prodigy, who rose to become the Astronomer Royal to the Emperor Rudolph. A man of destiny. Tycho, on the other hand, was a wealthy powerful political Dane, cynical in politics, pragmatic in his science and sceptical of theory. His tale is one of decline, of ultimate defeat and disappointment, as he dies knowing that his own planetary theory is fatally flawed, a fact proved Kepler himself, working as Tycho’s junior assistant.

It’s a good tale. It’s true, and it helps me to believe the myth of destiny, that everything that happens to me happens for a reason.

There’s an incontrovertible story arc to a man’s life. The biological facts alone, of birth, growth, senescence and death shape the overall narrative. In a lot of fiction, the structure, the plot mirrors this universal and inevitable timeline , the timeline of a mortal man. But if I were to write my autobiography, I’d be hard-pressed to make it a gripping tale.

Not that my life so far has been particularly dull. I can fill many pages with true episodes from my life which I’m sure I could make quite entertaining reading. No, the problem is simply that I haven’t so much lost the plot, as thrown it away.
 
You're fucking young. Too young to be senescent.

Edited to Add: Happy Birthday, Joe.
 
Last edited:
*bump*

For no other reason than this is damn fine reading.
 
I no longer care if live is random or ordered. I just take the moments of joy that it offers and weather the moments of pain.

Or I try at least.
 
Honestly Joe. You don't expect your life to play out as a drama, do you? That means some big climax at about age 65 when your prostate's the size of a cantaloupe. Better if life was like the list of ingredients in a box of Hamburger Helper, steady and calming with a colorful and shocking surprise every so often.
 
As we all know, the meaning of life is 42. Anything beyond that is a bonus. ;)

Happy Birthday, Joe. I sure have missed you around here. :kiss:
 
Honestly Joe. You don't expect your life to play out as a drama, do you? That means some big climax at about age 65 when your prostate's the size of a cantaloupe. Better if life was like the list of ingredients in a box of Hamburger Helper, steady and calming with a colorful and shocking surprise every so often.

Um -

Canteloupe?
 
Damn, I thought this was gonna be a thread about the (apparent) retrograde orbital motion of Mars.

If you have any intellectual honesty whatsoever— or a shred of integrity, working for Goldman, Sachs has to be a nightmare. I once sat next to a Goldman, Sachs hotshot on a cross country airplane trip and couldn't resist the chance to needle him about the firm's conflicts of interest (this was way back in the early '90s— i.e., well before most of the world was aware of the conflicts of interest that are inherent for any firm whose revenues are transaction-derived).

He, very matter-of-factly, shrugged and responded, "We have a conflict of interest in everything we do."

For me, one whose professional life has been guided by ethical choices, that was a stunning response— it simply took my breath away. To my way of thinking, the fellow had effectively just confessed to being a crook— and he didn't even bat an eye !

Thirty years ago, I was offered a position at that firm by one of its partners; I turned it down. I thought they were crooks. Nothing I've seen in all the years that followed has served to alter that opinion.


 
As we all know, the meaning of life is 42. Anything beyond that is a bonus. ;

Well, shoot! I thought the meaning of life was 69 at any age. ;)

And it's a bonus anytime too.



(Decadence is rampant around here.)
 
Happy birthday, whether you want it or not.

We've missed you around here.
 
I no longer care if live is random or ordered. I just take the moments of joy that it offers and weather the moments of pain.

Or I try at least.

When it's painful, I ask myself whether I would have wanted to miss out on this ride through the universe on the giant ball. No, I wouldn't want to miss it; I've stood in longer lines to get on Mister Toad's Wild Ride at Disneyland, and paid more for the privilege. This one's better.
 
When it's painful, I ask myself whether I would have wanted to miss out on this ride through the universe on the giant ball. No, I wouldn't want to miss it; I've stood in longer lines to get on Mister Toad's Wild Ride at Disneyland, and paid more for the privilege. This one's better.

Oh, you and your giant balls.. :rolleyes:
 
to sub joe,

it sounds like a wonderful screenplay, and i don't doubt there's another in there. i suspect every writer is delusional about his or her importance.

congratulations on your 50th. these are the times to focus on TS Eliot rather than Mozart, who was, after all, dead at your age.

:rose:
 
Hermann Hesse complained about the young kids who were reading "Steppenwolf" he said it would only make sense to readers over fifty.
From what I remember of it, it might be worth reading now-- for me and you both...:kiss:
 
Sub Joe...

Fifty is a good time to start writing seriously.

Quit whining and focus.

Humor me; thas my style, piss people off, get their attention, then perhaps, just perhaps, offer something of substance.

The Story of The Orbit of Mars is the story of the two 16th century astronomers Tycho de Brahe and Johann Kepler, whose relationship reminded me of my own relationship with my father.

The story of the evolution of the disciplines of Math, Physics and Astronomy, in fact all science, coming out of the Dark Ages and into the Renaissance, is a fascinating study in many respects.

Impossible to communicate all my thoughts here: edit, edit, edit!

First off, your philosophy is suspect and your sense of life, as communicated in this post, is questionable and in need of revision.

We are far past the Wilde, Fitzgerald, Maughm, era, just to thumbnail namedrop, and the Warhol, Kerourac stage of disillusionment, though some are still mired in the muck, but what is yet to come....perhaps you will be one to determine that.

I recall one or two Science or History Channel explorations of Brahe and Kepler, and many more, and of course a cursory exploration in the printed word concerning their lives and many more.

I wonder if one might compare 'rock stars' of the recent past, the Cobain, Hendrix, Joplin cadre, to the existential aloneness of some of the thinkers and artists of the past, as they explored areas unknown to others.

I think I only type about every 20th line of thought in an attempt at brevity.

Instead of a screen play written for the intellectual elite, always a goal to establish one's bonafide's, why not attempt a Pasteur or Cure' approach and sell a little Romanticism in your effort to communicate both the men, the era and the paternal conflict you imply?

Now would be a good time as humanity contemplates, in a serious manner, an actual footprint on a planet other than earth for the first time in human history.

Achieving the half century landmark, one should be able to put aside the libido, or at least rein it in, and surely, move beyond the Oedipus, doncha think?

Had Brahe and Kepler imagined that 400 years later, we would be remembering them, can you offer anything less?

Ah, well, as good a place as any to end this.

Amicus...
 
Humor me; thas my style, piss people off, get their attention, then perhaps, just perhaps, offer something of substance.
Well, you've got the first part down; the second and third need a lot of work.
 
Back
Top