dream_yahoozie
Oral Fanatic
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2024
- Posts
- 180
Yay 25 votes. I look forward to my 20th place participation trophy

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yay!Yay 25 votes. I look forward to my 20th place participation trophy![]()
![]()
Yay 25 votes. I look forward to my 20th place participation trophy![]()
![]()
We're not mediocre, we're celebrating being just popular enough to be noticed but not chosen to be torch bearersHey, hands off! If anyone is going to languish in mediocrity around here, it's me...
You are tied for fourth place just like I am…Yay 25 votes. I look forward to my 20th place participation trophy![]()
![]()
How is it tied in fourth? How do yo see the scores?You are tied for fourth place just I am…
When you say nobody…Nobody should count themselves out yet.
Cold Embrace went up as well (without any notification in my feed, though...). Looking forward to all the tumbleweed it gathers.Dead Together was published just a few minutes ago!
So the judges go through and look for voting discrepancies like a series of one star votes? I didn't realize they did that for contests. Most interesting.A lot of authors are reporting that the voting totals are lower than usual on this contest. I know mine are.
Low number of votes mean the scoring is very volatile. I’ve got a score of 4.62 with 69 votes. If 5 or 6 of those votes are one bombs that get removed in the sweeps, my score could jump up high enough to put me in contention. In one contest, the sweeps moved my score from the 4.60s to almost 4.90.
Nobody should count themselves out yet.
It's called "vote sweeps" around here, and it's almost certainly an automated process. You might be wondering why isn't it done in real time, but it's probably because it's easier to detect fraudulent votes when looking at broader voting patterns.So the judges go through and look for voting discrepancies like a series of one star votes? I didn't realize they did that for contests. Most interesting.
There are no judges. Manu and Laurel developed an automated algorithm, that removes many of what seem to be suspicious votes. The suspicious votes can be any value, but most seem to be ones. We do not know how they determine what is suspicious and we are explicitly forbidden to speculate about it on the forum. It is certainly not a perfect system, and some people have a been in her bonnet about this. (But they don't need to bring that up again, ahem.)So the judges go through and look for voting discrepancies like a series of one star votes? I didn't realize they did that for contests. Most interesting.
There are no judges. Manu and Laurel developed an automated algorithm, that removes many of what seem to be suspicious votes. The suspicious votes can be any value, but most seem to be ones. We do not know how they determine what is suspicious and we are explicitly forbidden to speculate about it on the forum. It is certainly not a perfect system, and some people have a been in her bonnet about this. (But they don't need to bring that up again, ahem.)
But, as @MelissaBaby said a few posts above, it can make a big difference. Really no one knows until the announcement who is going to get a prize. I certainly thought I was out of the running for the Nude Day event.
A lot of authors are reporting that the voting totals are lower than usual on this contest. I know mine are.
Low number of votes mean the scoring is very volatile. I’ve got a score of 4.62 with 69 votes. If 5 or 6 of those votes are one bombs that get removed in the sweeps, my score could jump up high enough to put me in contention. In one contest, the sweeps moved my score from the 4.60s to almost 4.90.
Nobody should count themselves out yet.
And in the hour or so before the results are announced you'll see changes in the ratings and #'s of votes as they run some final sweeps.
I have been in several contests in which there was friendly banter back and forth among those with very high scores about who was going to win. In every case, a story that was on no one's radar got a big boost from the final sweeps and finished in the top three.
@EmilyMiller can you help here?I've submitted 2 audio stories with the correct note to the admin, and neither has appeared on the list. I must have done something wrong, but dang if I know what it was.
...unless there are no audio stories allowed this year, which seems like something the admins should have mentioned in the original rules posting.
Oh well. It was fun to stretch my imagination for Spooky Season anyway. Good luck to all the entrants!
I’ve so far got absolutely nowhere with another audio story@EmilyMiller can you help here?

I’ve PMed them and chased up on the other audio story.@EmilyMiller can you help here?
What are the names? I only see one audio story submitted in October by you. That one does have a halloween tag. But not the full tag. Did you get the act wording on the note to the admin?