Samuari
Twice Blessed
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2000
- Posts
- 4,072
Recently, there was thread that became a discussion about the nature of friendship. It seems that one person divulged to her friend something that at least was not very smart, and could be considered unethical or immoral by a large segment of society. The friend was simply supportive, telling her to ‘go with her heart', while refusing to make any judgement at all. For the most part the other posters to the thread applauded that action saying what a good friend she was not giving any moral direction, and ‘just being there for her.'
I was against a dead line, and would not be able to stay on line long enough to give the issue the attention that I thought that it deserved. I have since been unable to find the thread to post to it, and it is perhaps better to reopen this discussion in a thread of its own, as it has bothered me all week.
I have very few friends that I trust enough to confide personal information that could be damaging to my family or others that I'm close to, but those few, I trust completely. One of the things that I would be asking for with my admission would be their moral judgement. I'm daily reminded that I make mistakes, so I seek the advice and council of those whom I trust. Part of that trust is that I know that these folks are as committed to me as I am to them, and that even if I chose to not follow their advice, they will remain my friend.
In Moral Theology, it is the process of separating the act form the actor. Christians are commanded to hate the sin, while loving the sinner. I may hate what my friend does, but I will still love, and respect that person, and will ‘be there for them'. Indeed, for me, it would be a cop out to not provide my opinion to my friend. It would be part of ‘always being there for them'. Anything less, and they would not be getting the fullness of who I am.
I was against a dead line, and would not be able to stay on line long enough to give the issue the attention that I thought that it deserved. I have since been unable to find the thread to post to it, and it is perhaps better to reopen this discussion in a thread of its own, as it has bothered me all week.
I have very few friends that I trust enough to confide personal information that could be damaging to my family or others that I'm close to, but those few, I trust completely. One of the things that I would be asking for with my admission would be their moral judgement. I'm daily reminded that I make mistakes, so I seek the advice and council of those whom I trust. Part of that trust is that I know that these folks are as committed to me as I am to them, and that even if I chose to not follow their advice, they will remain my friend.
In Moral Theology, it is the process of separating the act form the actor. Christians are commanded to hate the sin, while loving the sinner. I may hate what my friend does, but I will still love, and respect that person, and will ‘be there for them'. Indeed, for me, it would be a cop out to not provide my opinion to my friend. It would be part of ‘always being there for them'. Anything less, and they would not be getting the fullness of who I am.