SpeareChucker
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Oct 27, 2017
- Posts
- 24,614
bb got banned again?
Already?
Already?
The Michael Flynn Frame Up
- Thread starter Rightguide
- Start date
SpeareChucker
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Oct 27, 2017
- Posts
- 24,614
dreck ni**ers?
HisArpy
Loose canon extraordinair
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2016
- Posts
- 44,079
SpeareChucker
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Oct 27, 2017
- Posts
- 24,614
I don't leak...
HisArpy
Loose canon extraordinair
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2016
- Posts
- 44,079
Rightguide
Prof Triggernometry
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2017
- Posts
- 69,119
More evidence that Mueller and his team face an investigation. Judge Sullivan should order one:
Flynn bombshells cast doubt on Mueller prosecutor Brandon Van Grack's compliance with court order
By Gregg Re | Fox News
Explosive, newly unsealed evidence documenting the FBI's efforts to target national security adviser Michael Flynn -- including a top official's handwritten memo debating whether the FBI's "goal" was "to get him to lie, so we can prosecute him or get him fired" -- calls into question whether Brandon Van Grack, a Justice Department prosecutor and former member of Special Counsel Robert Mueller's Team, complied with a court order to produce favorable evidence to Flynn.
Since February 2018, Van Grack has been obligated to comply with D.C. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan's standing order in the Flynn case to produce all evidence in the government’s possession “that is favorable to defendant and material either to defendant’s guilt or punishment.”
The order also requires the government to submit favorable defense evidence to the court, including possible "impeachment evidence" that could undermine witnesses, even if the government believes the evidence “not to be material.”
What Van Grack didn’t inform the court about – and didn’t provide to Flynn – was the newly unsealed January 4, 2017 "Closing Communication" from the FBI Washington Field Office, which recommended the FBI close its investigation of Flynn, as its exhaustive search through government databases “did not yield any information on which to predicate further investigative efforts."
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/fl...s-by-former-special-counsel-brandon-van-grack
Flynn bombshells cast doubt on Mueller prosecutor Brandon Van Grack's compliance with court order
By Gregg Re | Fox News
Explosive, newly unsealed evidence documenting the FBI's efforts to target national security adviser Michael Flynn -- including a top official's handwritten memo debating whether the FBI's "goal" was "to get him to lie, so we can prosecute him or get him fired" -- calls into question whether Brandon Van Grack, a Justice Department prosecutor and former member of Special Counsel Robert Mueller's Team, complied with a court order to produce favorable evidence to Flynn.
Since February 2018, Van Grack has been obligated to comply with D.C. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan's standing order in the Flynn case to produce all evidence in the government’s possession “that is favorable to defendant and material either to defendant’s guilt or punishment.”
The order also requires the government to submit favorable defense evidence to the court, including possible "impeachment evidence" that could undermine witnesses, even if the government believes the evidence “not to be material.”
What Van Grack didn’t inform the court about – and didn’t provide to Flynn – was the newly unsealed January 4, 2017 "Closing Communication" from the FBI Washington Field Office, which recommended the FBI close its investigation of Flynn, as its exhaustive search through government databases “did not yield any information on which to predicate further investigative efforts."
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/fl...s-by-former-special-counsel-brandon-van-grack
