J
JAMESBJOHNSON
Guest
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ervice-hospital-patients-scientists-warn.html
Convicts eat better than hospital patients.
Convicts eat better than hospital patients.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ervice-hospital-patients-scientists-warn.html
Convicts eat better than hospital patients.
In the U.S., most prisons and county jails feed the prisoners on less that .25 cents per day. PER DAY. I don't know what they do in the UK, but here, .25 doesn't buy a lot of food.
In a lot of prisons in the western USA, they serve convicts 'nutriloaf' [aka 'nutraloaf.']
Recipe [from the 'Net:]
2 oz Cooked Ground Beef
4 oz Canned, Chopped Spinach
4 oz Canned Carrots, Diced
4 oz Vegetarian Beans
4 oz Applesauce
1 oz Tomato Paste
1/2 cup Potato Flakes
1 cup Bread Crumbs
2 oz Dry Milk Powder
1 tsp Garlic Powder or Flakes
Preparation: mash the fuck outta everything and slap it into a loaf pan. Cook until a solid loaf forms. The loaf can be served on a paper plate, with no utensils needed.
Nutriloaf may be the greatest advance ever in the fight against recidivism.
*whispers quietly in your ear*
The Daily Mail is the 20th century British equivalent of Der Stürmer. If you want to retain whatever credibility you have left, you'd be a lot better off quoting from a more respectable source.
Just sayin'![]()
The reality is that local sheriffs and state prison wardens are routinely told that if they can feed inmates at a lower cost than that provided for by the state, then they can take whatever money they have left over above what they spend and consider it a cash bonus for themselves. This happens constantly, and though the state may "report" that they spend $2.50 per inmate per day for food, the reality is that if they can spend less, they do it so they can pocket the difference. Below are links to one flagrant example of what I'm talking about.
http://floridainnocence.org/content/?p=435
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,477785,00.html
No one should feel envious of what inmates get for "food." It's worse than pig slop.
Youve changed your assertion. You backed off the 25 cents per diem and now assert that prisons dont allocate the entire per diem thats about 10x more than your original claim. Whats next?
No one should feel envious of what inmates get for "food." It's worse than pig slop.
Interesting that JBJ has taken a sudden interest in prison food.![]()
You dont know that for every prison and jail, everyplace. You dont help your cause when you shoot from the hip with claims that can be refuted.
And that's the problem with using that "Limey" newspaper The Daily Mail as a supposed source of factual information, because everything they print is eminently refutable. (In fact the 'Heartless murderers treated better than poor cancer patients' headline itself is meaningless. Such simple minded, completely unrelated and frankly misleading comparisons have no actual bearing on how successful [or not] a particular government department has been). Yours sincerely, an easily conned, "Limey" idiot.
P.S. How much does the US government currently spend on free meals for its law-abiding, hospitalized citizens? Is it more or less than the amount it spends on free meals for it's law-breaking prisoners?
I'm got some food for thought. You ever see what they feed their troups? Another question. Who deserves the good food more...the father of three who robbed a bank because his familly was starving, or the coke addict in bed 5.
Just sayin'![]()
That, of course, is only relevant if you know what is spent in comparison--as water_side says concerning hospital patients. You can, of course, rush off to judgment (that seems the popular thing to do), but water_side's question is as relevant for your posting as for JBJ's.
And that's the problem with using that "Limey" newspaper The Daily Mail as a supposed source of factual information, because everything they print is eminently refutable. (In fact the 'Heartless murderers treated better than poor cancer patients' headline itself is meaningless. Such simple minded, completely unrelated and frankly misleading comparisons have no actual bearing on how successful [or not] a particular government department has been). Yours sincerely, an easily conned, "Limey" idiot.
P.S. How much does the US government currently spend on free meals for its law-abiding, hospitalized citizens? Is it more or less than the amount it spends on free meals for it's law-breaking prisoners?