The "Grim" reality of Pornography!

[Topanga_Blue]

I can't believe he was even elected governor for my state -_-
bastard....

You and me both.

Actually he just barely got the nomination from his own state. Kinda tells you something right there, don't it.

 

[Katyusha]

I'm so ashamed. According to Mitt, I'm adding and abetting welfare to induce people to have babies out of wedlock!

From his Mitt Romney's speech last night: "tolerance for pornography-even celebration of it-and sexual promiscuity, combined with the twisted incentives of government welfare programs have led to today’s grim realities: 68% of African American children are born out-of-wedlock, 45% of Hispanic children, and 25% of White children."

The good news is that my porn seems to have a less-bad effect on whites than on blacks or hispanics.

Of course. Of freaking course. I never wanted to be part of the problem and now I am simply because I write porn.

Har de har har.

What I don't, and have never understood, is why people believe that sexual morality is the basis of this country and losing said morality will cause this country to fall. I'm not talking about being smart about sex, ie, using protection, but the very idea that having sex with who you want to have sex with, looking at or reading porn, patronizing strip clubs, etc., will eventually destroy this country.

And I don't understand why people are so concerned with what children are exposed to here when it comes to obscenity and sex and what-not. They're STILL trying to prove that exposure to all this stuff warps children's minds (as in, causes them to want to go out and be violent and obscene and have sex)...they've been trying to prove that for decades. So when something happens there's outrage and new laws or policies are created and we try and shelter our children even further, instead of talking to them about all this stuff as parents and giving them the knowledge they need about it. And people wonder why kids have no problems giving hand jobs and blow jobs on the school bus in front of everyone on the way home these days. Even worse, we wonder why they don't know the potential pitfalls and dangers of sex, and then we blame our education system or the government, neither of which should be required to or, IMNSHO, even involved in, providing said education for our children.

I don't know, maybe I'm naive. But I've never understood why people think that the government should have the right to control sexual morality. And therefore it's something I don't understand about people who consider themselves totally conservative. In general, they want minimal government interference in the lives of the people and in the running of business. And yet they want the government to define what is and is not obscene. They want the government to deal with abortion, outlaw it again. They want sexual and other types of morality legislated, which to me is the ultimate form of government interference in people's personal lives.

 

[Boxlicker101]

You miss the important part: you're induced this man (or woman) to sire the kid "out of wedlock"

I hope you lose sleep over this

I don't expect to lose any. I also get email from married couples telling me my stories help their sex life.

The folks in my stories almost always use condoms, by the way.

 

[john-the-author]

Have you ever noticed that there's an undercurrent to all these peckerheads' pronouncements about porn and whatever else they don't like that they're strong enough to withstand the evil blandishments of it all, but that Those Other Folks (that is, you and me, and whoever's not immediately behind said peckerhead) are Lacking in Moral Fiber and would not be able to resist the lure of porn/drugs/alcohol/gambling/the lottery/cable TV/credit cards.

I remember hearing someone I used to work for about 20 years ago, Randy Merillatt, wittering on about the poor (or "the poo-er" as he used to say) not having the strength of character to avoid the Washington State Lottery, which had just come into being. Although he could avoid it just fine, the "poo-er" (who had gotten to be poo-er because they never could avoid temptation, darn 'em!) couldn't and they'd be even more poo-er at the end of the day.

Mitt Romney's an asshole. And not a particularly bright example thereof. I can resist whatever it is I feel like resisting. And have. Mitt's secretly jerking off looking at pictures of Mormon underwear, I'll betcha--now there's a fetish!

 

[starrkers]

Mitt's secretly jerking off looking at pictures of Mormon underwear, I'll betcha--now there's a fetish!

Now there's an image to put anyone (in or out of wedlock) off sex for a month!

 

[Guest]

Now there's an image to put anyone (in or out of wedlock) off sex for a month!

I need to go wash my underwear or something.

Brush my teeth. I dunno.

 

[MagicaPractica]

Somebody save my soul! *sob* It's drowning in iniquity!



Hey, look. It floats.

 

[Boxlicker101]

Have you ever noticed that there's an undercurrent to all these peckerheads' pronouncements about porn and whatever else they don't like that they're strong enough to withstand the evil blandishments of it all, but that Those Other Folks (that is, you and me, and whoever's not immediately behind said peckerhead) are Lacking in Moral Fiber and would not be able to resist the lure of porn/drugs/alcohol/gambling/the lottery/cable TV/credit cards.

I remember hearing someone I used to work for about 20 years ago, Randy Merillatt, wittering on about the poor (or "the poo-er" as he used to say) not having the strength of character to avoid the Washington State Lottery, which had just come into being. Although he could avoid it just fine, the "poo-er" (who had gotten to be poo-er because they never could avoid temptation, darn 'em!) couldn't and they'd be even more poo-er at the end of the day.

Mitt Romney's an asshole. And not a particularly bright example thereof. I can resist whatever it is I feel like resisting. And have. Mitt's secretly jerking off looking at pictures of Mormon underwear, I'll betcha--now there's a fetish!

They don't say they're strong enough. They say something like: "The good Lord has given me enough morals and strength of character to resist these blandishments of Satan. However, I fear for my brethren who may be weak, who may give in. I feel the good Lord has called upon me to...." and you know what comes next.

That notion of "Mormon underwear" intrigues me. A very close friend of my second wife was a high ranking member of their church, and she never mentioned anything about underwear. Maybe she didn't know about it.

 

[cloudy]

I'm so ashamed.

 

[rgraham666]

I'm so ashamed.

http://bestsmileys.com/lol/1.gif

Sure.

 

[keeblercrumb]

It made my skin crawl...... It was really frightening…

This pornography stuff..... (what the hell did race have to do with those wedlock statistics?????) and "family values" that "some judge" in Massachusetts is against.... I am a little lost on the connection between children born out of wedlock and gay marriage (the only thing I can remember the Mass. judges ruling on).... I would think the issues were... well.. mutually exclusive.... Unless those gay guys would marry those pregnant single women.. hmmmmm.

What really scared me is that I think he really believes it... and while he did not say what he is prepared to do about it (and degenerate Europe).... the prospect of any action is really scary.

Now this whole thread is a group rape of the guy.... None of our "conservative" posers.. uhhhh posters... have not yet stepped up to accept responsibility for Mitt....

But what I truly do not understand is why, as perfectly content little pornographers themselves, they are not equally or even more outraged by this naked(sic) attack on us all??? Is there any more individual right more "individual" than our sexuality????? Is there anything more invasive of our private lives by the government?

They want the government out of their wallets… I want the government out of my pants.


-KC

 

[Boxlicker101]

It made my skin crawl...... It was really frightening…

This pornography stuff..... (what the hell did race have to do with those wedlock statistics?????) and "family values" that "some judge" in Massachusetts is against.... I am a little lost on the connection between children born out of wedlock and gay marriage (the only thing I can remember the Mass. judges ruling on).... I would think the issues were... well.. mutually exclusive.... Unless those gay guys would marry those pregnant single women.. hmmmmm.

What really scared me is that I think he really believes it... and while he did not say what he is prepared to do about it (and degenerate Europe).... the prospect of any action is really scary.

Now this whole thread is a group rape of the guy.... None of our "conservative" posers.. uhhhh posters... have not yet stepped up to accept responsibility for Mitt....

But what I truly do not understand is why, as perfectly content little pornographers themselves, they are not equally or even more outraged by this naked(sic) attack on us all??? Is there any more individual right more "individual" than our sexuality????? Is there anything more invasive of our private lives by the government?

They want the government out of their wallets… I want the government out of my pants.


-KC

If Romney had pontificated on another subject, and been flamed, somebody here might have come to his defense. However, nobody here is going to defend somebody who attacks pornography.

Many statistics, especially negative ones, are broken down by race. I don't know why, but they almost always are.

 

[keeblercrumb]

If Romney had pontificated on another subject, and been flamed, somebody here might have come to his defense. However, nobody here is going to defend somebody who attacks pornography.

Many statistics, especially negative ones, are broken down by race. I don't know why, but they almost always are.

Well.... if some lame ass Liberal goes down that road, I guarantee I will flame him... or her.....

As for the statistics, perhaps because he assumes that conservatives are 99% white? Perhaps he was pandering to their racial prejudices and stereotypes? Just a wild guess but I am open to alternative interpretations..

As for "always are"... you are right and it bugs the crap outa me. In the current election where one candidate is a woman and another is of African American heritage, I suppose statistics by gender and race have some significance if they contribute to the discussion.... But we do it way too much.

But then I am jealous... I keep getting lumped into the utterly un-definable but oft repeated group of "white" with a lot of raging assholes I do not want to be associated with.

-KC

 

[3113]

None of our "conservative" posers.. uhhhh posters... have not yet stepped up to accept responsibility for Mitt....

Most of the conservatives on this site are more libertarian and likely to vote that way--meaning they want government BOTH out of their wallet and their bedrooms. So that gets them off the hook of supporting Mitt in this. The less government the better is their motto, in all and every way.

Those that are conservative enough to question gay marriage and such would likely point out that Mitt hitched porn to welfare in those statistics, suggesting, interestingly, that if we get folk off welfare (and off porn) they won't have babies out of wedlock.

I still don't see the connection, myself, but what do I know? I'm voting democrat and I write porn. According to Mitt, I'm not only the cause of this mess, but I'm working for the terrorists!

 

[keeblercrumb]

Most of the conservatives on this site are more libertarian and likely to vote that way--meaning they want government BOTH out of their wallet and their bedrooms. So that gets them off the hook of supporting Mitt in this. The less government the better is their motto, in all and every way.

Those that are conservative enough to question gay marriage and such would likely point out that Mitt hitched porn to welfare in those statistics, suggesting, interestingly, that if we get folk off welfare (and off porn) they won't have babies out of wedlock.

I still don't see the connection, myself, but what do I know? I'm voting democrat and I write porn. According to Mitt, I'm not only the cause of this mess, but I'm working for the terrorists!

And fathering babies out of wedlock, no doubt.


-KC

 

[Katyusha]

But what I truly do not understand is why, as perfectly content little pornographers themselves, they are not equally or even more outraged by this naked(sic) attack on us all??? Is there any more individual right more "individual" than our sexuality????? Is there anything more invasive of our private lives by the government?

They want the government out of their wallets… I want the government out of my pants.


-KC

I said something about it...

 

[keeblercrumb]

I said something about it...

So you did... and eloquently as well. My apologies.....

Moreover, unlike the government, are welcome to probe my pants anytime....



-KC

 

[keeblercrumb]

No... really.... keep looking... I know the little son' bitch is in there somewhere!

-KC

 

[dr_mabeuse]

If only more niggers could read...

 

[john-the-author]

It made my skin crawl...... It was really frightening…

But what I truly do not understand is why, as perfectly content little pornographers themselves, they are not equally or even more outraged by this naked(sic) attack on us all??? Is there any more individual right more "individual" than our sexuality????? Is there anything more invasive of our private lives by the government?

Well, some of us keep wondering whenever people like this stand up and start flapping their lips about Christian values just how they'd feel about another Christian value--martyrdom for one's faith. I mean, you *WOULD* be doing them a favor, after all: they get to sit at God's right hand and be favored above almost all else in Heaven. And the rules say they have to protest and that the messier the martyrdom, the holier, so if it took, oh, days, they'd be objecting loudly all along, but ~GOD~ would know that their faith was p'yure and would elevate them to the ranks of the Holy.

I believe that everyone who professes such a strong belief inflicting what they're telling us that God's called them to do upon everyone else for our own supposed collective good should have every opportunity to get the full value of their obviously divinely-inspired life. Pat Robertson makes me think along these lines every time I have the misfortune to see the senile little fucknozzle on TV, but there are certainly others who do, too. They talk to God and God talks to them. They've told us so and who are we to doubt them?

Was this the kind of outrage you were thinking of? I'm sure we could come up with something else if it didn't quite fit.

John

 

[keeblercrumb]

Was this the kind of outrage you were thinking of? I'm sure we could come up with something else if it didn't quite fit.

John

Yeah... that cerrtainly works for me in the category of "outrage"

And you bring up a curious issue... this suicide thing..

I remember back at 9/11 when my and most everyone's blood lust was running high... a curious statement by our President in his great speech...

He referred to the "cowardly" attack.... Even then, it struck me as odd. I mean call it what you will on a moral level, but "cowardly" mmmmm no. As compared to the courage of launching a cruise missile, for instance?

Of course there is the great "quote" of Patton:

"No bastard ever won a war by dying for his country. He won it by making the other poor dumb bastard die for his country."

But on a faith and courage level........

-KC

 

[rgraham666]

I'm fairly certain that the deity the 'Loud Christians' work for is one of a more crimson colour.

The two most common traits they display are Pride and Wrath, with a fair bit of Avarice thrown into the mix. Those were still Deadly Sins last time I looked.

 

[Liar]

Well.... if some lame ass Liberal goes down that road, I guarantee I will flame him... or her.....

Ya mean like Tipper Gore, who went into moral superiority frenzy over something far less explicit than porn?

 

[keeblercrumb]

Ya mean like Tipper Gore, who went into moral superiority frenzy over something far less explicit than porn?

Exactly like her.

-KC

 

[oggbashan]

...And you bring up a curious issue... this suicide thing..

I remember back at 9/11 when my and most everyone's blood lust was running high... a curious statement by our President in his great speech...

He referred to the "cowardly" attack.... Even then, it struck me as odd. I mean call it what you will on a moral level, but "cowardly" mmmmm no. As compared to the courage of launching a cruise missile, for instance? ...
-KC

I think the cowards were those who twisted religious fervour into persuading young men that committing suicide, and indiscriminately killing people, was pleasing to God. That sort of perverse logic is the antithesis of what Islam represents.

Og