The "Grim" reality of Pornography!

[keeblercrumb]

I think the cowards were those who twisted religious fervour into persuading young men that committing suicide, and indiscriminately killing people, was pleasing to God. That sort of perverse logic is the antithesis of what Islam represents.

Og

Yeah.... you are right about that.

-KC

 

[champagne1982]

Ok. How many of us write about gay sex? How does that promote children out of wedlock?

And did you notice that the damned socialist Canadians, with their decided welfareness and apparent overwhelming population of WASPs and Free-White-and-Over-21s has been snubbed and excluded from Mr Witt's blather?

 

[champagne1982]

Oh hell. I just realized that in many ways some folks in the USofA consider Canada the 51st state. We must be the pornographers responsible for that quarter of the white bastards. We even show fucking on TV. Or at least the francophones do.

 

[Boxlicker101]

Ok. How many of us write about gay sex? How does that promote children out of wedlock?

And did you notice that the damned socialist Canadians, with their decided welfareness and apparent overwhelming population of WASPs and Free-White-and-Over-21s has been snubbed and excluded from Mr Witt's blather?

For that matter, how does anal sex or oral sex promote out of wedlock births? We write about that a lot.

 

[3113]

Oh hell. I just realized that in many ways some folks in the USofA consider Canada the 51st state. We must be the pornographers responsible for that quarter of the white bastards. We even show fucking on TV. Or at least the francophones do.

Now, now. Don't blame yourself. I don't think any of that Canadian filth gets to the U.S.. Certainly not the fucking on TV. Our brave and vigilant FCC is very strict about what it allows over the borders. Remember, it was a U.S. nipple, shown on the most American of events, the superbowl, here on U.S. soil, that did so much damage.

I'm quite sure that your porn is only responsible for born-out-of-wedlock Canadians. We in the U.S. must take full responsibility for what our porn has done to our our people.

 

[champagne1982]

We, who watched that half-time show on Canadian TV didn't get to see the mulberry tinted baby-feeder. It was on a 30 second time delay that allows advertisers to insert Canadian commercial content. Long live the CRTC. See? Our government provides birth control, through censorship and the constant whine about Canadian content, for all the welfare Dads who drink beer and watch American football. Isn't that nice?

 

[champagne1982]

For that matter, how does anal sex or oral sex promote out of wedlock births? We write about that a lot.

Woah thar, Box. Ya'll meen "I kiked down the door and kamed in her face," dont git ya babees??? Thar were spurms wuddn't thar and an orfis nar t them?

 

[3113]

We, who watched that half-time show on Canadian TV didn't get to see the mulberry tinted baby-feeder. It was on a 30 second time delay that allows advertisers to insert Canadian commercial content. Long live the CRTC. See? Our government provides birth control, through censorship and the constant whine about Canadian content, for all the welfare Dads who drink beer and watch American football. Isn't that nice?

*sniff* Excuse me while I wipe a tear from my eye. Now there is a government that truly cares about it's citizens! I don't know what we'll do here in the U.S. now that Romney is no longer in the race for President. We'll have to hope that McCain can handle not only the war in Iraq but also the porn that's causing all these out-of-wedlock babies.

I had wondered why the abstinence-only, sex-ed programs weren't doing much good...little did I realize that the culprit behind their failure was something I was personally involved in...pornography!

 

[Boxlicker101]

Personally, I do not feel that my smut leads to out-of-wedlock babies. For one thing, my characters almost always practice safe sex. I mean either oral or anal or using condoms or all three. The few exceptions involve sex with a unicorn or with an observor from the planet Zoop.

 

[Guest]

Personally, I do not feel that my smut leads to out-of-wedlock babies. For one thing, my characters almost always practice safe sex. I mean either oral or anal or using condoms or all three. The few exceptions involve sex with a unicorn or with an observor from the planet Zoop.

Planet Zoop?

Damn. My stuff is pretty damn dull compared to this.

 

[AvoidingRealWork]

Mitt Romney needs to get laid. Just ignore him.

Are they allowed to take off the underwear when getting nookie?

For that matter, when they were allowed multiple wives, could they have them at once, or did they have to do them separately? Seriously, I've always wondered that.

 

[AvoidingRealWork]

Oh hell. I just realized that in many ways some folks in the USofA consider Canada the 51st state. We must be the pornographers responsible for that quarter of the white bastards. We even show fucking on TV. Or at least the francophones do.

What about fart-lighting? Because if American children see that, they are sure to try and emulate.

 

[Boxlicker101]

Planet Zoop?

Damn. My stuff is pretty damn dull compared to this.

Yes, the planet Zoop. The name of the observor is Zuzie, and she is featured in my last three stories when they are in alphabetical order. That's stories, not poems.

 

[Guest]

Yes, the planet Zoop. The name of the observor is Zuzie, and she is featured in my last three stories when they are in alphabetical order. That's stories, not poems.

I must seek them out.

 

[Stella_Omega]

Are they allowed to take off the underwear when getting nookie?

For that matter, when they were allowed multiple wives, could they have them at once, or did they have to do them separately? Seriously, I've always wondered that.

There are slits in the underwear for having sex.

And the men are supposed to go to one wife at a time-- one night at a time.

Have fun, but not too much...

 

[Boxlicker101]

There are slits in the underwear for having sex.

And the men are supposed to go to one wife at a time-- one night at a time.

Have fun, but not too much...

They would be limited to only one at a time. Any of the men here would be getting it on with two or three but, to them, sex is supposed to be for procreation, so the men are limited in what sex acts they can do. At least, theoretically. I doubt that it works that way in practice.

 

[Stella_Omega]

They would be limited to only one at a time. Any of the men here would be getting it on with two or three but, to them, sex is supposed to be for procreation, so the men are limited in what sex acts they can do. At least, theoretically. I doubt that it works that way in practice.

I've been told that they are limited to one wife in 24 hours. Can't find corroboration-- but I admit I don't care to look too far into the matter....

 

[Boxlicker101]

I was just now writing some on a story that is the fourth in a series, when I remebered some PC I had gotten on the third one. It was about a twenty year old who gets into the shower with her father and sucks him off. Four out of the five expressed a wish to emulate the female character, and get it on with their fathers, and the other one may have hinted at the same thing. I wonder if I induced any of those women to have incestual sex. I wonder if I should feel guilty if I did. If any of those women did, I hope they and their fathers had as much fun as the fictitious characters did.

 

[xssve]

Right, it's got nothing to do with totaly destroying African American family life with Man in the House rules back inthe Thirties and Forties, the stress of unemployment and racism, an economy where poverty is pretty much guaranteed if the wife doesn't work, and you have to move every six months if you want to keep working, following the jobs around, or drugs, in a country where there's a pill for everything and pharmacueticals have pretty much replaced the automobile as the engine of the instant gratification economy, and if you are successful, you have to keep trading up to a better class of wife if you want to stay socially acceptable - of course examining all that would mean that there might be a downside to capitalist/consumer culture in terms of the sorts of social stressors it generates, and we can't have that.

Porn is about having sex without having children - now who is it that insists every sexal act must result in pregnency, and lobbies endlessly to limit sex education and access to birth control, when the deck is already stacked against responisbility due to the republican culture of machismo and avoiding responsibility - as well as throwing as many people in jail as they can for any reason whatsoever?

The really bad thing about recreational sex, is that everbody loves it but there's no easy way to tax it, and take a cut - if there was a pill that could give you an orgasm, that cost $100, I'm pretty sure it would get past the FCC.

Politically, this is is the same old shit, cause a problem so you can claim to be the solution to it - and, incedentally, get your grubby hands on nice, fat stream of public and private revenue and influence.

Shouldn't complain though, without all that sexual frustration that results, there wouldn't be such a booming market for porn.

 

[3113]

Right, it's got nothing to do with totaly destroying African American family life with Man in the House rules back inthe Thirties and Forties, the stress of unemployment and racism, an economy where poverty is pretty much guaranteed if the wife doesn't work, and you have to move every six months if you want to keep working, following the jobs around, or drugs, in a country where there's a pill for everything and pharmacueticals have pretty much replaced the automobile as the engine of the instant gratification economy, and if you are successful, you have to keep trading up to a better class of wife if you want to stay socially acceptable

Ding! I'm sorry, but that answer is far too complicated and, if taken as a viable reason as to why there's out-of-wedlock babies, waaaaay too hard to solve.

Which is why Mr. Romney will be sticking with pornography and welfare as the causes of out-of-wedlock babies. By this logic, ridding the world of either solves the problem.