The "For the People Act" (HR1/SR1) -- what's the downside?

[pecksniff]

You can read all about it here. What's objectionable?

 

[Rightguide]

if you don't know, you're too dumb to be here.

 

[RobDownSouth]

You can read all about it here. What's objectionable?

Nothing less than the End of White Supremacy as we know it!

 

[WillJ8787]

You can read all about it here. What's objectionable?

Nothing, unless your a racist.

 

[Cubantripod]

It's a waste of time because it will not survive a constitutional challenge.

 

[RobDownSouth]

It's a waste of time because it will not survive a constitutional challenge.

Teh "Constitutional Right To White Supremacy" doesn't exist (except on Planet BoBo)

 

[CornusKousa]

Teh "Constitutional Right To White Supremacy" doesn't exist (except on Planet BoBo)

Rob is still conflating liberty with 'white supremacy'...LOL what a fuckin' nut.

 

[CornusKousa]

Nothing, unless your a racist.

It doesn't have anything to do with racism.

 

[Cubantripod]

Teh "Constitutional Right To White Supremacy" doesn't exist (except on Planet BoBo)

Your inability to articulate a valid counterargument does not make something white supremacy.

 

[pecksniff]

It's a waste of time because it will not survive a constitutional challenge.

Why not? What constitutional provisions does it go against?

 

[pecksniff]

Nothing less than the End of White Supremacy as we know it!

I doubt counting every vote would achieve that.

 

[pecksniff]

The For the People Act[1] (also known as H.R. 1) is a bill in the United States Congress intended to expand voting rights, change campaign finance laws to reduce the influence of money in politics, limit partisan gerrymandering, and create new ethics rules for federal officeholders.

What's wrong with any of that?

 

[Vetteman]

Why not? What constitutional provisions does it go against?

It would let black people easily vote.

 

[Ramone45]

It would let black people easily vote.

How come black people can't vote? Expand voting rights to whom?

 

[CornusKousa]

I doubt counting every vote would achieve that.

Can't ever let that one go, how will your victimhood politics be promoted without that nebulous great white boogeyman out there oppressing you??

It would let black people easily vote.

Not any more than it would let white people easily vote.

Literally zero change on that front.

How come black people can't vote? Expand voting rights to whom?

They're pretending black people can't vote, it's part of their whole "It's STILL 1820!!!" fantasy for their live action role playing.

 

[RobDownSouth]

How come black people can't vote? Expand voting rights to whom?

You left out an important word in his quote...the word "easily".

When majority white precincts have 100 voting machines at a polling location, and majority non-white precincts have 4 voting machines at a polling location (and the precinct population is similar), it it pretty clear to anyone with an IQ above room temperature (sorry, "Stanford") that this sort of thing is a deliberate attempt to lessen minority vote participation.

The above is simply one of the "death by a thousand cuts" technique that conservatives are using to preserve a white majority in the face of their dwindling percentage of the overall American population.

 

[WillJ8787]

You left out an important word in his quote...the word "easily".

When majority white precincts have 100 voting machines at a polling location, and majority non-white precincts have 4 voting machines at a polling location (and the precinct population is similar), it it pretty clear to anyone with an IQ above room temperature (sorry, "Stanford") that this sort of thing is a deliberate attempt to lessen minority vote participation.

The above is simply one of the "death by a thousand cuts" technique that conservatives are using to preserve a white majority in the face of their dwindling percentage of the overall American population.

Is Mr.Stanford quoting from the textbooks again without a source?

I've been waiting over a year for his Stanford sources....a institution he could not ever get into. But, he could probably get into the University of Britannica .

 

[CornusKousa]

Is Mr.Stanford quoting from the textbooks again without a source?

I've been waiting over a year for his Stanford sources....a institution he could not ever get into. But, he could probably get into the University of Britannica .

Just because you rejected them in a fit because they backed me up so you moved the goalpost doesn't mean you weren't given them.

 

[WillJ8787]

Just because you rejected them in a fit because they backed me up so you moved the goalpost doesn't mean you weren't given them.

One can't reject something that isn't present.

 

[RobDownSouth]

Is Mr.Stanford quoting from the textbooks again without a source?

I've been waiting over a year for his Stanford sources....a institution he could not ever get into. But, he could probably get into the University of Britannica .

With his SAT scores? The only way he gets into a legitimate 4 year institution of higher learning is through a minority set-aside scholarship.

Remember, his sister got the looks and intelligence....he got the substance abuse problems and psychological issues ('borderline' sociopath, remember?)

 

[WillJ8787]

With his SAT scores? The only way he gets into a legitimate 4 year institution of higher learning is through a minority set-aside scholarship.

Remember, his sister got the looks and intelligence....he got the substance abuse problems and psychological issues ('borderline' sociopath, remember?)

I believe you are right about the scholarship....and I know he would take it like he took the federal relief money....hypocrites gotta be hypocrites.

 

[jomar]

It would let black people easily vote.

Thank you for your honest reply.

 

[RobDownSouth]

I believe you are right about the scholarship....and I know he would take it like he took the federal relief money....hypocrites gotta be hypocrites.

In a world comprised of "makers" and "takers", he's in the 99th percentile for "takers".

"Welfare for me but not for thee!"

 

[CornusKousa]

One can't reject something that isn't present.

Posted it, you were wrong.

This is just a continuation of your "NUH UHHHH!!!! LIBERALISM MEANS THE TOTALITARIAN GOD STATE I WANT!!!"

Keep crying cupcake.

With his SAT scores? The only way he gets into a legitimate 4 year institution of higher learning is through a minority set-aside scholarship.

Remember, his sister got the looks and intelligence....he got the substance abuse problems and psychological issues ('borderline' sociopath, remember?)

I believe you are right about the scholarship....and I know he would take it like he took the federal relief money....hypocrites gotta be hypocrites.

In a world comprised of "makers" and "takers", he's in the 99th percentile for "takers".

"Welfare for me but not for thee!"

More bullshit from the whiney losers....gotta make themselves feel better about their support for the authoritarianism they support.

Keep on begging for that welfare guys.

 

[pecksniff]

I started this thread because somebody in another thread, I forget who now, seemed to seriously suggest that this bill has something to do with illegal immigrants voting.