U
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The only problem is which side to put the people who built it on once it's done.Well the fence is a stupid idea unless our primary goal is to create jobs.
Well the fence is a stupid idea unless our primary goal is to create jobs.
The only problem is which side to put the people who built it on once it's done.
Why have a border at all?
The south side, unless we build it with Canada in which case the north side. It doesn't matter who builds the fence they should still end up on the other sid when we finish and we know that because they are building the fence.
Lots of reasons. That doesn't make a fence any less stupid.
No. I'll let you figure it out. You're so much smarter than me.
Here's the sell out:
Fences have never worked.
They can . . . Kangaroos are one thing, and Mexicans are another.
Here's the sell out:
REPACKAGED AMNESTY BILL ALLOWS NAPOLITANO TO NIX BORDER FENCE
by MATTHEW BOYLE 22 Jun 2013
Another loophole inserted into the new version of the “Gang of Eight” immigration bill allows Department of Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano (or any of her successors) to nix the construction of a required border security fence if she does not find it to be an "appropriate" use of resources.
The new version of the bill was introduced via a so-called “border surge” amendment from Sens. Bob Corker (R-TN) and John Hoeven (R-ND), with Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid repackaging the whole bill into the amendment.
On page 35, line 24 of the new bill, a provision was inserted that says Napolitano--who already believes the border is secure--can decide against building a fence if she chooses not to erect one:
Notwithstanding paragraph (1), nothing in this subsection shall require the Secretary to install fencing, or infrastructure that directly results from the installation of such fencing, in a particular location along the Southern border, if the Secretary determines that the use or placement of such resources is not the most appropriate means to achieve and maintain effective control over the Southern border at such location.
The “paragraph (1)” that new waiver refers to is the one that supposedly “requires” the construction of a fence along the border.
Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall establish a strategy, to be known as the ‘Southern Border Fencing Strategy,’ to identify where 700 miles of fencing (including double-layer fencing), infrastructure, and technology, including at ports of entry, should be deployed along the Southern border,” that paragraph of the bill reads.
This could allow illegal aliens to be granted amnesty, or legalized “Registered Provisional Immigration (RPI)” status, once Secretary Napolitano submits a fencing (and border security) plan to Congress. However, this provision allows Napolitano to decide against building the fence after doing so, with no legal ramifications.
As Breitbart News has already detailed, a similar provision was inserted with regard to border security technology requirements.
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Govern...-Big-Sis-can-decide-to-not-build-border-fence
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Govern...order-security-provisions-in-immigration-bill
Well the fence is a stupid idea unless our primary goal is to create jobs.
We have a super-long rabbit fence - didn't work.
We have a dingo fence - didn't work.
We don't have a kangaroo fence, but if we did, to work it would need to be at least 20 feet high.
The Chinese had a rock fence - didn't work.
The Germans had a concrete fence - sorta worked, but only because there were soldiers stationed every 10 metres.
If you build a fence, how do you plan to make it work?
Well, that's where the minefield and the alligator-stocked moat come in. (Never tried those, didja?!)
Yeah, a border fence can work -- if it's something along the lines of the Korean DMZ. Which is very expensive, and still needs to be patrolled.
Well the fence is a stupid idea unless our primary goal is to create jobs.
The south side, unless we build it with Canada in which case the north side. It doesn't matter who builds the fence they should still end up on the other sid when we finish and we know that because they are building the fence.
Lots of reasons. That doesn't make a fence any less stupid.