The "Epstein Files"

WOW! Is This the Rosetta Stone That Explains Epstein's Vast Wealth and Intelligence Ties?​

Victoria Taft | 12:00 PM on December 22, 2025


If the latest information about Jeffrey Epstein is accurate, the dead financier didn’t just have ties to the CIA. He allegedly brokered gun-running and other illicit deals for the Langley-based intelligence agency and others—first as a junior broker at Wall Street’s Bear Stearns, and later through the disgraced Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI).


While such connections have long been speculated about—most notably in Whitney Webb’s One Nation Under Blackmail, Volumes One and Two—former Trump-era State Department lawyer Mike Benz says this is the first time he has seen evidence that Bear Stearns, which collapsed during the 2008 financial crisis and was later acquired by JPMorgan Chase, was “actively clearing BCCI trades and laundering weapons payments during the very years Epstein worked there.”

The BCCI was a notorious bank that operated as a global, clandestine banking system for international spy agencies. BCCI is reputed to have been involved in "some of the most sensitive intelligence operations of the Reagan-Bush years." The bank was closed in the early 1990s due to its shady connections.

Benz has speculated before that Epstein's ties to intelligence agencies came from his proximity to the Iran-Contra affair, but recent information connects the financier and human trafficker to intelligence agencies before and after the secret — and illegal — deal to sell arms to embargoed Iran and then use the money to help the Contra rebels in Nicaragua. The CIA's Southern Air Transport is also connected.

More here: https://pjmedia.com/victoria-taft/2...-intelligence-agencies-looks-like-it-n4947386
 
And for the usual suspects, you have brilliantly demonstrated the old adage, "if you can't dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bullshit."
 

WOW! Is This the Rosetta Stone That Explains Epstein's Vast Wealth and Intelligence Ties?​

Victoria Taft | 12:00 PM on December 22, 2025


If the latest information about Jeffrey Epstein is accurate, the dead financier didn’t just have ties to the CIA. He allegedly brokered gun-running and other illicit deals for the Langley-based intelligence agency and others—first as a junior broker at Wall Street’s Bear Stearns, and later through the disgraced Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI).


While such connections have long been speculated about—most notably in Whitney Webb’s One Nation Under Blackmail, Volumes One and Two—former Trump-era State Department lawyer Mike Benz says this is the first time he has seen evidence that Bear Stearns, which collapsed during the 2008 financial crisis and was later acquired by JPMorgan Chase, was “actively clearing BCCI trades and laundering weapons payments during the very years Epstein worked there.”

The BCCI was a notorious bank that operated as a global, clandestine banking system for international spy agencies. BCCI is reputed to have been involved in "some of the most sensitive intelligence operations of the Reagan-Bush years." The bank was closed in the early 1990s due to its shady connections.

Benz has speculated before that Epstein's ties to intelligence agencies came from his proximity to the Iran-Contra affair, but recent information connects the financier and human trafficker to intelligence agencies before and after the secret — and illegal — deal to sell arms to embargoed Iran and then use the money to help the Contra rebels in Nicaragua. The CIA's Southern Air Transport is also connected.

More here: https://pjmedia.com/victoria-taft/2...-intelligence-agencies-looks-like-it-n4947386
*chuckle* Southern Air Transport was the most poorly kept secret in Miami.
 
I'm waiting for the Holy Grail....five photos that guarantee the destruction of MAGA as we know it and the guaranteed impeachment conviction of Donald J. Trump...to wit:
  • Four photos of 13 and 14 year old girls, straddling Trump poolside in a lounge chair at Epstein Island, one right after the other, all four girls topless wearing nothing but bikini bottoms.
  • Then a group shot of Trump standing up, two topless 14 year old girls on each side of him....the girls are laughing and pointing at the crotch of Trump's swim trunks, which has what looks like a cum stain in front. Trump has that goofy chagrined look on his face you sometime see in pictures.
This is how Rob gets off.
 
RobDownSouth said:
I'm waiting for the Holy Grail....five photos that guarantee the destruction of MAGA as we know it and the guaranteed impeachment conviction of Donald J. Trump...to wit:
  • Four photos of 13 and 14 year old girls, straddling Trump poolside in a lounge chair at Epstein Island, one right after the other, all four girls topless wearing nothing but bikini bottoms.
  • Then a group shot of Trump standing up, two topless 14 year old girls on each side of him....the girls are laughing and pointing at the crotch of Trump's swim trunks, which has what looks like a cum stain in front. Trump has that goofy chagrined look on his face you sometime see in pictures.

This is how Rob gets off.
I'm thinking right now that some MAGA enthusiasts are using AI to produce images like that and splatter them all over the internet, so when the real images show up in the Epstein files they can claim that Epstein put fake AI photos in his files decades ago!
 
So, now you're going to explain why you think so, and give sources? Right, Rightguide?
Doubtful.

Despite his little "kumbayah" soapboxing about the lack of civility on social media the other day, Rightguide routinely splutters "BS! BS! BS!" when confronted with an opinion he disagrees with.

At some level, he recognizes he cannot compete intellectually with virtually anyone on this forum, and his chronic lack of ability to articulate his own position seems to frustrate him enormously.
 
Doubtful.

Despite his little "kumbayah" soapboxing about the lack of civility on social media the other day, Rightguide routinely splutters "BS! BS! BS!" when confronted with an opinion he disagrees with.

At some level, he recognizes he cannot compete intellectually with virtually anyone on this forum, and his chronic lack of ability to articulate his own position seems to frustrate him enormously.
Refuting BS is a waste of time. Identifying it is the only respect it will get from me. BTW, Merry Christmas to you and yours.
 
Once again: Trump cannot be criminally prosecuted while president. (There's no authority for that rule but the opinion of one of Nixon's lawyers, but nobody seem inclined to challenge it.) And he (probably) cannot be impeached for things he did before he was president. So no matter what is found in these files, it won't get him out of office before 2029 -- nothing will, short of death or a 25th Amendment solution.
 
Once again: Trump cannot be criminally prosecuted while president. (There's no authority for that rule but the opinion of one of Nixon's lawyers, but nobody seem inclined to challenge it.) And he (probably) cannot be impeached for things he did before he was president. So no matter what is found in these files, it won't get him out of office before 2029 -- nothing will, short of death or a 25th Amendment solution.
He's protected by an opinion of the DOJ's Office of Legal Counsel as well as the following:

Trump v. United States, the Supreme Court held that:


  • A former president is entitled to absolute immunity from criminal prosecution for actions taken within his core constitutional authority — that is, acts that fall within the president’s exclusive powers under Article II of the Constitution.
  • A former president also has presumptive immunity for other official acts, and those would require further adjudication at the trial-court level to determine whether they truly count as “official.”
  • Only unofficial acts — conduct that is not part of the president’s constitutional or statutory duties — are not immune from prosecution. Legal Information Institute+
 
He's protected by an opinion of the DOJ's Office of Legal Counsel as well as the following:

Trump v. United States, the Supreme Court held that:


  • A former president is entitled to absolute immunity from criminal prosecution for actions taken within his core constitutional authority — that is, acts that fall within the president’s exclusive powers under Article II of the Constitution.
  • A former president also has presumptive immunity for other official acts, and those would require further adjudication at the trial-court level to determine whether they truly count as “official.”
  • Only unofficial acts — conduct that is not part of the president’s constitutional or statutory duties — are not immune from prosecution. Legal Information Institute+
Well, having jollies with teen prostitutes is no official act.
 
Back
Top