The "Courts" are ludicrous

[oryginalny]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1990994206387535981

 

[ll74]

The authority isn't the President's.

The court intervenes when the law isn't followed.

Perhaps he can just make up another emergency.

 

[Rebel5soul]

The authority isn't the President's.

The court intervenes when the law isn't followed.

Perhaps he can just make up another emergency.

Says who?

Post the law or STFU.

 

[ll74]

Says who?

Post the law or STFU.

It's in the sourced document, dipshit.

23. GSA has statutory authority pursuant to 40 U.S.C. § 3305 to paint the exterior of the Eisenhower Executive Office Building if the exterior were to be painted.

This authorityincludes any power washing/cleaning and/or repointing of the exterior.4. GSA will not authorize or engage in the physical actions of power washing/cleaning,painting, or repointing the Eisenhower Executive Office Building before December 31,2025. Nor would GSA delegate its authority pursuant to 40 U.S.C. § 121(d), orauthorize any use of its gift authority pursuant to 40 U.S.C. § 3175, to perform any suchactions before December 31, 2025.5. This certification is signed under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1746.

 

[HisArpy]

It's in the sourced document, dipshit.

You know the GSA is a department within the administration, yes? And that the document is an agreement between the admin and the courts, yes?

What I don't get is the court entertaining every anti-Trump lawsuit that comes along and giving it more than the bare consideration it's due before dismissing most of them. In this case, why is the court even bothering to require anything of the government merely because some Leftist wacko dipshits don't want the Eisenhower building washed/repainted if Trump is going to do it?

The entire lawsuit is meritless and the parties involved, including the attorneys, should be sanctioned without mercy.

 

[ll74]

You know the GSA is a department within the administration, yes? And that the document is an agreement between the admin and the courts, yes?

Yes, the law lays out the procedure and process for actions taken in altering of a building.

The President can declare an emergency of building maintenance...as he has everything else to sidestep legal process....¯⁠\⁠(⁠°⁠_⁠o⁠)⁠/⁠¯

Sadly, he could just work with the GSA and budget that Congress gave them in order to achieve his goal....

Instead....he just has no respect for the law.

 

[Rebel5soul]

Ahh, cleaning and refreshing the exterior is now an "alteration." Try arguing that one with your HOA.

Worthless fucking judge.

 

[ll74]

Ahh, cleaning and refreshing the exterior is now an "alteration." Try arguing that one with your HOA.

Worthless fucking judge.

Read the statute. It's not ambiguous.

Our autocratic President wants to ejaculate his golden horseshit all over everything. The least he could do is follow the law to do so.

The asshole doesn't give a shit about the law...he thinks he's the CEO of another company....and you fuckers do too....he's not.

 

[oryginalny]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1991195599056576632

 

[RoryN]

Says who?

Post the law or STFU.

It's in the sourced document, dipshit.

pwned

 

[Rebel5soul]

I wonder if anyone has bothered to really understand how stupid that ruling is? There is NO WAY that building could be pressure washed, let alone painted, between now and Dec. 31.

 

[ll74]

I wonder if anyone has bothered to really understand how stupid that ruling is? There is NO WAY that building could be pressure washed, let alone painted, between now and Dec. 31.

Did you read the court filing?

(Answer: no)

 

[HisArpy]

I wonder if anyone has bothered to really understand how stupid that ruling is? There is NO WAY that building could be pressure washed, let alone painted, between now and Dec. 31.

It could be done. It'd be expensive and would completely shut down the building and surrounding area for a week, but it could be done.

 

[Rebel5soul]

It could be done. It'd be expensive and would completely shut down the building and surrounding area for a week, but it could be done.

If they started today I'd make a wager with you.

 

[HisArpy]

If they started today I'd make a wager with you.

It's about will and manpower. If you really want it done, and can get the manpower to do it, almost anything is possible even in a short time frame. In that context, 40 days is a lifetime to git 'er done.

 

[HumpDayHoratio]

All laws and bickering aside…

My question is; why would Judge Karen care about a building getting a bath?

 

[HisArpy]

All laws and bickering aside…

My question is; why would Judge Karen care about a building getting a bath?

It's about stonewalling Trump. That's it, the whole enchilada.

 

[MajorRewrite]

All laws and bickering aside…

My question is; why would Judge Karen care about a building getting a bath?

There are regulations about what can be done to the historic buildings in DC (except when tearing things down to build a palace ballroom, apparently). And it’s about more than “a bath”.

 

[Rebel5soul]

There are regulations about what can be done to the historic buildings in DC (except when tearing things down to build a palace ballroom, apparently). And it’s about more than “a bath”.

What 'regulations' enacted by who?

 

[HisArpy]

What 'regulations' enacted by who?

I too wonder about this. I also wonder if the nightly cleaning crews and building maintenance know about these "regulations."

 

[MajorRewrite]

What 'regulations' enacted by who?

Here’s a summary offered by AI, but if you’re genuinely interested (doubtful), Google is your friend.

Regulations for historic federal buildings in Washington, D.C. are
a combination of federal and local laws. The National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) of 1966provides the overarching framework, establishing requirements for federal agencies and creating the National Register of Historic Places. Locally, the D.C. Historic Landmark and Historic District Protection Act of 1978 protects historic sites within the District, which includes many federal buildings. Additionally, the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties (36 CFR Part 68) guide specific treatment methods like preservation, rehabilitation, restoration, and reconstruction.

Federal regulations

• National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA): This is the primary federal law for historic preservation. It requires federal agencies to consider the impact of their undertakings on historic properties and established the National Register of Historic Places.
• Secretary of the Interior's Standards: These are the guidelines for any work done on a historic property, whether it's preservation, rehabilitation, restoration, or reconstruction. They provide a standard set of principles to ensure the property's historic integrity is maintained.

Local regulations

• D.C. Historic Landmark and Historic District Protection Act: This local law protects historic landmarks and structures that are part of historic districts listed on the D.C. Inventory of Historic Sites. Many federal buildings fall under this protection.
• D.C. Historic Preservation Plan: The D.C. Office of Planning develops this plan to guide preservation efforts within the District, encompassing both government and community activities.

Key aspects of the regulations

• Preservation of historic integrity: The laws and standards aim to protect the historic character and integrity of federal buildings from damage or inappropriate alterations.
• Federal and local oversight: Both federal and local government entities are involved in the regulation and approval process for work on historic federal buildings in Washington, D.C.
• Comprehensive framework: Federal and local legislation work together to create a comprehensive regulatory framework that addresses both the historical and architectural significance of these buildings.

 

[ll74]

I too wonder about this. I also wonder if the nightly cleaning crew knows about these regulations.

You're wondering about statutes that are created by Congress?

Are you a lawyer?