The Bridge

Where's Omar Sharif, who in the hell did the casting?
 
You think you know stuff.
Eau d'Contraire, which is a new perfume for people who argue a lot. I know three things, and I just learned them from Ashton Kutcher.

On the other hand, you make a lot of threads about TV shows.
 
Demian Bichir looks like he would be a smart ass and practical joker.

In my opinion.

I will always associate Ted Levine with Buffalo Bill.
 
Why are you interested in what I make threads about?
Reading threads on a board where people make threads doesn't exactly indicate indicate interest. When you sneeze, and someone says "gesundheit," do you ask them why they are interested in you sneezing?

I just noticed that you start a lot of threads about TV shows. There's nothing to be defensive about, unless you're embarrassed about the amount of TV you watch. Maybe you are, not for me to say.
 
Why are you interested in what I make threads about?

Bromance.jpg
 
Reading threads on a board where people make threads doesn't exactly indicate indicate interest.
Reading threads doesn't, obviously. On the other hand, I don't see you telling people who start lots of political threads how much time they spend on politics, or people who start sex threads how much sex they have.

But drawing the conclusion that I watch "a lot" of TV because I make "a lot" of threads about TV shows is demonstrative of a poor grasp of logical reasoning. In addition, "a lot" of threads about TV shows, and "a lot" of watching television are subjective quantities, obviously, and you failed to define what either one means to you.

Based on no information, and employing a logical fallacy besides, your statement "You watch a lot of TV" is clearly nothing but a passive-aggressive snipe.


When you sneeze, and someone says "gesundheit," do you ask them why they are interested in you sneezing?
What a crappy analogy. See above.

I just noticed that you start a lot of threads about TV shows. There's nothing to be defensive about, unless you're embarrassed about the amount of TV you watch.
I just noticed that you like to take digs at people while trying to seem as though you aren't. Same fallacy, see above. Also, I'm "defensive," now, too, and "embarrassed," so doubling-down on the passive-aggressive bit. Good idea, there.

Maybe you are, not for me to say.
Yeah, right... after you just said it. You really have no idea how obvious what you're doing is, do you?

Well, maybe you're just a cowardly dumbass, but that's not for me to say.
 
Last edited:
I seemed to have wandered into a pissing contest. I am backing away hoping I don't get splashed.
 
Reading threads doesn't, obviously. On the other hand, I don't see you telling people who start lots of political threads how much time they spend on politics, or people who start sex threads how much sex they have.

But drawing the conclusion that I watch "a lot" of TV because I make "a lot" of threads about TV shows is demonstrative of a poor grasp of logical reasoning. In addition, "a lot" of threads about TV shows, and "a lot" of watching television are subjective quantities, obviously, and you failed to define what either one means to you.

Based on no information, and employing a logical fallacy besides, your statement "You watch a lot of TV" is clearly nothing but a passive-aggressive snipe.


What a crappy analogy. See above.

I just noticed that you like to take digs at people while trying to seem as though you aren't. Same fallacy, see above. Also, I'm "defensive," now, too, and "embarrassed," so doubling-down on the passive-aggressive bit. Good idea, there.

Yeah, right... after you just said it. You really have no idea how obvious what you're doing is, do you?

Well, maybe you're just a cowardly dumbass, but that's not for me to say.

Dude.
 
Back
Top