The Big Fat Trio

[Rebel5soul]

are losing their BIG FAT asses and are in jeopardy of being sanctioned. Yep, BIG FAT Alvin, BIG FAT Leticia, and BIG FAT Fanny (misspell purposeful) are all becoming further unhinged as they continue to pursue their bogus legal actions. It hasn't dawned on them that they no longer have any political future.

 

[ll74]

Wtf are you talking about?

 

[Rebel5soul]

Work of art.

The link is to a breakdown of Pres. Trump's attorneys final retort to BIG FAT Alvin's filing with the court in regards to the "hush money" fiasco. It's long, 39 min., and it's filled with some flowery language.

BUT

Trumps attorney, politely, calls BIG FAT Alvin a incompetent political hack while at the same time taking the judge to law school and telling them both, explicitly, what's going to happen if the case in not immediately dismissed.

Well worth the time if you want to see how a real attorney calls people;

Stupid
Delusional
Incompetent
Worthless

In direct language without getting into contempt land. It's a work of fucking art.

 

[ll74]

Work of art.

The link is to a breakdown of Pres. Trump's attorneys final retort to BIG FAT Alvin's filing with the court in regards to the "hush money" fiasco. It's long, 39 min., and it's filled with some flowery language.

BUT

Trumps attorney, politely, calls BIG FAT Alvin a incompetent political hack while at the same time taking the judge to law school and telling them both, explicitly, what's going to happen if the case in not immediately dismissed.

Well worth the time if you want to see how a real attorney calls people;

Stupid
Delusional
Incompetent
Worthless

In direct language without getting into contempt land. It's a work of fucking art.

A lawyer calling someone that in a filing is only a work of art for 9 yrs olds. You're probably upset that there weren't more words used

 

[eric_erosfan]

Lawyers and CEOs. Usually walking down the sidewalks in NYC.

 

[Rebel5soul]

Adding to BIG FAT Alvins problems is the fact that Mr. Penny's lawyer are going to sue his BIG FAT ass for malicious prosecution.

Meanwhile down in Georgia BIG FAT Fanny is still refusing to comply with the subpoena. Her future isn't looking too bright going forward.

 

[MajorRewrite]

Adding to BIG FAT Alvins problems is the fact that Mr. Penny's lawyer are going to sue his BIG FAT ass for malicious prosecution.

Meanwhile down in Georgia BIG FAT Fanny is still refusing to comply with the subpoena. Her future isn't looking too bright going forward.

But what does BIG FAT Donnie have to say about it? We want to hear directly from the Blubber in Chief.

 

[PaxNurgle]

Wtf are you talking about?

Usual Hisarpy/Icanhelp/Rebel5soul (et al.) bullshit.

 

[ll74]

Usual Hisarpy/Icanhelp/Rebel5soul (et al.) bullshit.

I didn't ask you, dipshit

 

[Rebel5soul]

As anyone with half a brain could predict, BIG FAT Fanny got her BIG FAT ass thrown off the case. The question now is whether there's another prosecutor willing to trash their legal career to pick the case up?

 

[Deleted member 6873114]

Wtf are you talking about?

Looking back, do you NOW understand? Fanny's fanny just got kicked off the case. We all knew this months ago. Why is it so hard for some to see?

 

[ll74]

Looking back, do you NOW understand? Fanny's fanny just got kicked off the case. We all knew this months ago. Why is it so hard for some to see?

I know that the OP failed.to provide a source to their thread. That hasn't changed.

 

[Rebel5soul]

I'm nobodies researcher or librarian. If you're too fucking stupid, or lazy, to look up the subject material don't bother posting.

 

[ll74]

I'm nobodies researcher or librarian. If you're too fucking stupid, or lazy, to look up the subject material don't bother posting.

You're not even your own researcher, so that tracks.

 

[Rightguide]

are losing their BIG FAT asses and are in jeopardy of being sanctioned. Yep, BIG FAT Alvin, BIG FAT Leticia, and BIG FAT Fanny (misspell purposeful) are all becoming further unhinged as they continue to pursue their bogus legal actions. It hasn't dawned on them that they no longer have any political future.

All are legal failures for the reasons we've stated ad infinitum from day one.

 

[Rebel5soul]

All are legal failures for the reasons we've stated ad infinitum from day one.

Exactly, but you can bet your ass that some moron is going to quote you and post "Link?"

 

[Rightguide]

Looking back, do you NOW understand? Fanny's fanny just got kicked off the case. We all knew this months ago. Why is it so hard for some to see?

Some were trapped in the fervor of a religious crusade against Trump. They didn't want to open their eyes and be met with the elephant in the room, a triumphant Donald Trump.

 

[Rightguide]

Exactly, but you can bet your ass that some moron is going to quote you and post "Link?"

I'll direct them to my old thread on the issue.

 

[ll74]

I'll direct them to my old thread on the issue.

You're not fucking getting it. Posting a source isn't for education on a topic. It's to provide the perspective to others which you rely on to reach your conclusions.

So if I have an opinion, based on what I read or heard, I provide you the same thing I read or heard so that you can compare your reaction with mine based on the same source material.

It has nothing to do with being lazy or not doing the research. It's having a discussion based on the same context. I may know the actual topic of discussion but not have the same source material from which it is shared. And so the spin and analysis may differ..

I don't ask these things to be an ass....I want you to make an argument which can be based on the same material that I might reply. And yes, I might argue that your source material is biased or even shit (gateway pundit and PJ media are both consistently shit) but that is an argument based on the source material rather than your position

 

[schism666]

ish, aj, and vetteman?

 

[schism666]

are losing their BIG FAT asses and are in jeopardy of being sanctioned. Yep, BIG FAT Alvin, BIG FAT Leticia, and BIG FAT Fanny (misspell purposeful) are all becoming further unhinged as they continue to pursue their bogus legal actions. It hasn't dawned on them that they no longer have any political future.

100 bucks says you got fani beat by at least 50lbs

 

[Rightguide]

You're not fucking getting it. Posting a source isn't for education on a topic. It's to provide the perspective to others which you rely on to reach your conclusions.

So if I have an opinion, based on what I read or heard, I provide you the same thing I read or heard so that you can compare your reaction with mine based on the same source material.

It has nothing to do with being lazy or not doing the research. It's having a discussion based on the same context. I may know the actual topic of discussion but not have the same source material from which it is shared. And so the spin and analysis may differ..

I don't ask these things to be an ass....I want you to make an argument which can be based on the same material that I might reply. And yes, I might argue that your source material is biased or even shit (gateway pundit and PJ media are both consistently shit) but that is an argument based on the source material rather than your position

You're the one who doesn't "get it." I told you all along this case would fail and explained the reasons why. You have the same access to legal analysis I do. You could have done the research yourself and refuted what was presented, but you're too lazy to do so. I posted statements that this case was going to fail. I have no doubt you argued against it because I said it, but if you did we can all see now that you were wrong.

 

[Rebel5soul]

You're the one who doesn't "get it." I told you all along this case would fail and explained the reasons why. You have the same access to legal analysis I do. You could have done the research yourself and refuted what was presented, but you're too lazy to do so. I posted statements that this case was going to fail. I have no doubt you argued against it because I said it, but if you did we can all see now that you were wrong.

Precisely my point all along.

 

[ll74]

You're the one who doesn't "get it." I told you all along this case would fail and explained the reasons why. You have the same access to legal analysis I do.

I don't read or have access to the same search results you do. The legal analysis I read typically comes to differing conclusions. And you'd know that if you read any of the sources I provide for YOU to read.

As an example, pjmedia is a go to for you. I know they have shit journalists and writers. That helps me understand your position.

You could have done the research yourself and refuted what was presented, but you're too lazy to do so. I posted statements that this case was going to fail. I have no doubt you argued against it because I said it, but if you did we can all see now that you were wrong.

I do research for things i care about. Your analysis is different than mine.

And if you provide your sources, I can come to a conclusion based on the same thing.

But whatever.....I'll just stick with my "wtf are you talking about" and then you can tell me I'm lazy.

I'm not....you are.....but more power to ya. A fucking copy paste URL is not that fucking hard

 

[ll74]

Precisely my point all along.

Yes, your point is that you don't want people to read the same sources you have read to reach your conclusions.

And you wonder why people don't agree with your arguments.