The Baker: for all of you who want higher Wealth and Capital Gains Taxes

But it's DIFFERENT when your buddies use alts, right Miles Ben Zonah? Especially when they're using alts to post pictures of other members' kids!

Not to mention the whole legion of Cades that are just peachy with the RWCJ when he's posting shitloads of anti Obama nonsense.
 
The funniest part of all of this is that the Cap'n inadvertently shot down the argument that he himself uses trying to defend the FairTax.

Paraphrased-
Of course companies will cut their prices to reflect the new lower tax, if they don't the competition will eat them alive.

But for some reason the same isn't true of a piemaker who raises his prices. :rolleyes:

I gave two courses of action. I showed how both of them led to the same position.

If there are competing pie makers, then each may decide upon their strategy.

When it came to the fairtax discussion you said as a businessman, you would certainly not pass the savings on to the customer and I said I would and thus put you out of business, but this is not the same case now is it, in this case the government is actively cutting into you future working Capital, so the comparison, as it were is an example of apples to oranges.

Again, as I clearly showed, a government's decision to tax wealth, profit, or dividend, as a net negative effect upon an economy no matter how the Baker decides to deal with it for it is a sheer destruction of Capital.

Bringing the FairTax into the discussion is merely indicative of an old axe you have to grind and is not comparative for it increases Capital by not punishing productivity and risk-taking.

What you want is an examination of the scenario that comes after when king and crown decide, after some reflection, that they had better stop stealing leftover pie in order to grow their economy and by indirection their own wealth through more fair taxation.
 
MM, how about a poll where we get to vote on which Loonie Badge of Shame to use?




Polls are for loonie gang bangs.

Normal people don't need to think alike.

I much prefer the diversity of interchangeable insults.... I mean icons. ;)
 
While this exercise has focused on a medieval baker, it is one easily scalable to any modern business and the government that rules over it for the laws expressed in are fixed and easily determined. There is no such a thing as a free slice of pie; someone has to pay for it. If more pie is taken now, there will be less pie in the future and free pie now is merely a temporary friendly specter that becomes the nightmare haunting of the future.

This was a very good story, I especially like the summary here.
 
Works fine for me, even after clearing cache and using a different browser ...

maybe you should make a poll.
(said facetiously)











...
 
Last edited:
Anyone who studies the history of ideas should notice how much more often people on the political left, more so than others, denigrate and demonize those who disagree with them -- instead of answering their arguments.
Thomas Sowell

Really...............







attachment.php


Not serious enough and a little too large...

How about ?

A few more Loonie Lib Debate Tactics:

It’s okay to put words in someone else’s mouth. "Are you saying you enjoy torturing kittens and puppies?" (I experienced this twice yesterday)

Accuse or imply a conservative poster is gay This is a favorite tactic of male lit libs.

Jackass is more fitting.

More tactics:

Always reframe the other side’s argument into something you can actually debate against.

Another common tactic loonies employ when they clearly don't understand the discussion. Similar to deflecting and/or changing the subject.

Yes, much more serious of a symbol ...

I wish we could make the list a sticky to remind them of their stupidity. :D

... or two


It’s a wonder that no one takes you guys seriously, Isn’t it?

Woof!
 
I gave two courses of action. I showed how both of them led to the same position.

If there are competing pie makers, then each may decide upon their strategy.

When it came to the fairtax discussion you said as a businessman, you would certainly not pass the savings on to the customer and I said I would and thus put you out of business, but this is not the same case now is it, in this case the government is actively cutting into you future working Capital, so the comparison, as it were is an example of apples to oranges.

Again, as I clearly showed, a government's decision to tax wealth, profit, or dividend, as a net negative effect upon an economy no matter how the Baker decides to deal with it for it is a sheer destruction of Capital.

Bringing the FairTax into the discussion is merely indicative of an old axe you have to grind and is not comparative for it increases Capital by not punishing productivity and risk-taking.

What you want is an examination of the scenario that comes after when king and crown decide, after some reflection, that they had better stop stealing leftover pie in order to grow their economy and by indirection their own wealth through more fair taxation.

History says that you're full of shit.

During the periods of highest economic growth our top marginal tax rate was MUCH higher than it is now.
 
Works fine for me, even after clearing cache and using a different browser ...

maybe you should make a poll.
(said facetiously)



...


Someone explain to the retard what a fucking hotlink is.
 
Back
Top