The Alternate Iso Blurt Thread: GFY can stay on iggy.

[islandman]

These eggs, bacon, grape tomatoes and coffee just won't make themselves.

STAT!

 

[Saint Peter]

Harsh.

 

[islandman]

Harsh.

Choice.

 

[pointless]

Harsh.

but understandable. that cunt goes out of his way to be annoying. he wants to be ignored. that's the point.

 

[RobDownSouth]

but understandable. that cunt goes out of his way to be annoying. he wants to be ignored. that's the point.

Concur.

 

[Bert Notorius]

but understandable. that cunt goes out of his way to be annoying. he wants to be ignored. that's the point.

quoted for irony.

 

[Bert Notorius]

Concur.

quoted for irony.

 

[Saint Peter]

quoted for irony.

quoted because you are a cunt.

 

[Byron In Exile]

Harsh.

Ah! I C

 

[pointless]

quoted for irony.

don't use words you don't understand.

 

[Byron In Exile]

It doesn't matter.

This thread is a counterfeit.

The real Alternate Iso Blurt Thread is here:

The Isolated Blurt Thread VII: Romanes Eunt Domus

 

[Laurel]

My only contribution to this thread

http://big.assets.huffingtonpost.com/DonCries.gif

 

[pointless]

see? now that's irony.

 

[yossi]

I wouldn't mind seeing a blurt turf war. We need at least two gangs to start.

 

[RobDownSouth]

Laurel, can you please delete GoFuckYourself's first post in the new IsoBlurt thread? Those of us who have GFY on ignore (and we are legion) can't see the thread.

Thanks in advance!

 

[islandman]

http://big.assets.huffingtonpost.com/DonCries.gif

Lit. is what you make of it.

Someone smart once wrote that on this very board.

 

[Saint Peter]

For every independent blurt thread on page one there is another political thread being pushed to page two.

 

[islandman]

I wouldn't mind seeing a blurt turf war. We need at least two gangs to start.

This one would have to be a MASSIVE, SCREEN-STRETCHING, FAKE TITTIES, ONLY PICS ALLOWED blurt thread for it to be considered a turf war.

Plus, I call dibs on the name 'Sharks'.

 

[Byron In Exile]

For every independent blurt thread on page one there is another political thread being pushed to page two.

Exactly.

We're in a win-win scenario, here.

I don't see a problem.

 

[yossi]

http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lldl3pxgos1qclvq3.gif

 

[islandman]

Americans at their worst: Bowe Bergdahl's father receives death threats: police chief

The threats came as Hailey, a tourist community of some 8,000 people in the mountains of central Idaho, was buffeted by hundreds of vitriolic phone calls and emails.

The celebratory spirit that infused Hailey a week ago with news of Bergdahl’s release turned to apprehension as an onslaught of angry messages were directed at city officials, businesses and friends of the Bergdahls over a hometown rally to mark his freedom planned for June 28.

 

[Laurel]

Laurel, can you please delete GoFuckYourself's first post in the new IsoBlurt thread? Those of us who have GFY on ignore (and we are legion) can't see the thread.

Thanks in advance!

As I've said in the other thread - save myself (and that's only because no one can, not because they don't want to), there has not been a thread-starter of any Blurt thread who has not been on multiple people's Ignore lists.

Every single time we've started a Blurt thread I've received concerned PMs from people who have the new starter on Ignore.

I've privately expressed my sympathy, and explained that if we are to allow anyone to start Blurt threads - as was suggested by the good people of the Gee Bee - then that means everyone. Not just the nonexistent person who is not on a single Ignore list.

I now appreciate those people who had the class and manners to privately complain to me, then quietly move on until the thread ended without ruining other people's fun.

You know who you are. Thank you.

 

[pointless]

having an opinion that differs from yours is not ruining other people's fun.

 

[islandman]

As I've said in the other thread - save myself (and that's only because no one can, not because they don't want to), there has not been a thread-starter of any Blurt thread who has not been on multiple people's Ignore lists.

Every single time we've started a Blurt thread I've received concerned PMs from people who have the new starter on Ignore.

I've privately expressed my sympathy, and explained that if we are to allow anyone to start Blurt threads - as was suggested by the good people of the Gee Bee - then that means everyone. Not just the nonexistent person who is not on a single Ignore list.

I now appreciate those people who had the class and manners to privately complain to me, then quietly move on until the thread ended without ruining other people's fun.

You know who you are. Thank you.

Until such time as the other thread ends, people are free to use this one. And, if they should have me on iggy, they're free to start their own.

I don't understand the part about 'ruining people's fun'. Is fun available only in the official Iso Blurt thread?

 

[Byron In Exile]

Laurel, can you please delete GoFuckYourself's first post in the new IsoBlurt thread? Those of us who have GFY on ignore (and we are legion) can't see the thread.

Thanks in advance!

Y'know, I watched him counting down, and I thought... "should I sneak the last one in?"

But then I thought, nah, let's see what happens with this...

And man, did I make the right call, or what?