Rightguide
Prof Triggernometry
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2017
- Posts
- 69,403
BSThe judiciary is playing no different a role now than it did in the days of John Marshall.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
BSThe judiciary is playing no different a role now than it did in the days of John Marshall.
There are no more than two kinds of shooting sports: Targets, and hunting.The Second Amendment isn't about hunting. There are many different kinds of shooting sports
The judiciary is playing no different a role now than it did in the days of John Marshall.
Judges make the law. That has been the common-law tradition for a thousand years, and the FFs never changed it.
N.B.: When they start talking about banning assault rifles, and you start nitpicking the definition of "assault rifle," that makes you the asshole.I know you think AR stands for "assault rifle"
Judges make the law. Any lawyer in the English-speaking world will tell you the same.No, you fucking moron: Congress makes the laws, the President approves them, and the courts apply them.
Judges make the law. Any lawyer in the English-speaking world will tell you the same.
Do not say that unless you would have said exactly the same thing, in exactly the same words, when Obama or Biden was president.And about 'the will of the people,' poll-driven governance is not the standard in a constitutional republic. If it were, mob rule would be the law of the land. Trump was elected by the system the Constitution designed, not by Twitter surveys or media polls. Cry harder."
No, historically, they never do. Except in Cambodia.Which is why after most revolutions the lawyers get slaughtered.
No, historically, they never do. Except in Cambodia.
Not for being a lawyer.Maximillian Robespierre would disagree with you had his head not been cut off.
But no act of Congress means anything but what the judges say it means.In any case, Congress makes law in this country.
But no act of Congress means anything but what the judges say it means.
It is the truth. Any lawyer in the country will tell you so, including Federalist Society members.
The Constitution expressly forbids reducing a judge's pay.Congress can also refuse to appropriate funding for the courts and not give a shit what a judge has to say about it.
The Constitution expressly forbids reducing a judge's pay.
Refusing to appropriate funds is a Congressional perquisite. Period. Full stop.
Uninformed BS. A simple search you could have performed before looking like a big dummy:There are no more than two kinds of shooting sports: Targets, and hunting.
Those are all forms of target shooting. What I said remains true.Uninformed BS. A simple search you could have performed before looking like a big dummy:
Rifle Shooting
- Smallbore Rifle (e.g., .22 caliber at 50 meters or 50 feet)
- High Power Rifle (larger calibers, longer distances)
- Benchrest Shooting (precision shooting from a bench rest)
- F-Class (long-range precision rifle competition)
- Biathlon (skiing and rifle shooting combined)
- Silhouette Shooting (knocking down metal animal targets)
- Three-Position Rifle (prone, standing, and kneeling)
Pistol/Handgun Shooting
- Bullseye Pistol (precision target shooting)
- Action Pistol / Practical Shooting (e.g., IPSC, USPSA — speed, movement, and accuracy)
- Steel Challenge (speed shooting at steel targets)
- IDPA (International Defensive Pistol Association — simulates self-defense scenarios)
- Rapid Fire Pistol (Olympic event — very fast shooting at multiple targets)
- Cowboy Action Shooting (using historical-style firearms with period costumes)
Shotgun Sports
- Trap Shooting (clay targets launched away from shooter)
- Skeet Shooting (clay targets crossing side-to-side)
- Sporting Clays (a "golf course" of shooting with different clay target presentations)
- 5-Stand (shotgun shooting at multiple target types from five stations)
- Helice (ZZ Bird) (spinning target sport)
Combined / Multigun
- 3-Gun Competitions (rifle, shotgun, and pistol used in stages)
- Multigun Matches (variants with more or fewer guns, or special configurations)
Long-Range / Extreme Shooting
- ELR (Extreme Long Range) (shooting at targets over 1,000 yards — sometimes over 2,000!)
- Precision Rifle Series (PRS) (long-range shooting from multiple challenging positions)
Archery (Technically separate, but often grouped with shooting sports)
- Target Archery
- Field Archery
- 3D Archery (shooting at life-like animal targets)
Airgun Sports
- 10m Air Rifle
- 10m Air Pistol
- Field Target (Air Rifle Shooting at metal targets at unknown distances)
Military / Tactical-Style Shooting
- Sniper Competitions
- Combat Shooting
- Service Rifle Matches (using military-style rifles)
Historical / Specialty Shooting
- Muzzleloading / Black Powder Shooting
- Civil War Reenactment Shooting
- Vintage Rifle Matches (using historical firearms)
- Long Range Buffalo Rifle Shooting (using 19th-century black powder cartridge rifles)
Bonus: Some niche or unusual types
- Mounted Shooting (horseback + pistols at balloon targets)
- CQB Shooting
Congress holds the power to create or eliminate federal court districts, adjust their funding, and thereby influence the continuation of their operations. All federal courts inferior to the Supreme Court are creations of Congress and are not established by the Constitution itself.Article III
Section 1
The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour, and shall, at stated Times, receive for their Services, a Compensation, which shall not be diminished during their Continuance in Office.
And what is Congress doing on that currently?Congress holds the power to create or eliminate federal court districts, adjust their funding, and thereby influence the continuation of their operations. All federal courts inferior to the Supreme Court are creations of Congress and are not established by the Constitution itself.
The courts could rule on any of those things if the question came before them in connection with a case in controversy.Congress can declare war and not give a shit what a judge has to say about it.
Congress can ratify treaties and not give a shit what a judge has to say about it.
Congress can set their own rules and not give a shit what a judge has to say about it.
Congress can impeach and remove a President and not give a shit what a judge has to say about it. Even though the Chief Justice presides to maintain order the Senate will vote as they wish regardless if the Chief Justice objects.
Congress can also refuse to appropriate funding for the courts and not give a shit what a judge has to say about it.
The point being, they all have different classes, models, design, calibers, and functions of firearms.Those are all forms of target shooting. What I said remains true.
There are half a dozen forms of auto racing, but they are all really the same.
And auto racing has stock cars, Formula One, and so on, but it's all the same thing.The point being, they all have different classes, models, design, calibers, and functions of firearms.
Yes, Congress is actively considering measures that could affect the structure and authority of the federal judiciary, particularly concerning the consolidation of federal court districts and the regulation of federal judges' powers. Below the results of a simple search you could have done yourself before commenting:And what is Congress doing on that currently?
Lol