The 2nd amendment DOES NOT mean you have a right to own an AR-15

[Bray123]

 

[LLCox]

So I guess the 2nd means you can bare your arms.

 

[Philthy_Phil]

The OP is stupid because the 2nd Amendment doesn't say what guns you're allowed to have.

First it's an enumerate Right which "shall not be infringed." Which means we're not "allowed" to own guns, it's our God Given Right and the Government cannot take that away from us.

Second, it says ARMS, as in ALL arms. Of which the AR-15 is just one type.



Your post is just as stupid because you can't differentiate from the anti-gun talking points and reality. Why? Because you don't bother to educate yourself before opening your yap and shoving your foot past your tonsils.

So take your own advice and just FO.

You have no grounds to call anyone stupid. You say the dumbest shit ever and claim to be a lawyer.

 

[wallstreetguy]

Sure it does. 2A was supposed to prevent government tyranny. An AR15 will do that more than a handgun. When Biden said you need tanks and jets to beat the US, he obviously did not pay attention to his daily briefings on the Taliban.

 

[HisArpy]

I've never owned a firearm nor have I ever fired one. But I like my rights. Some people are willing to give away some of their rights. They have valid reasons for wanting to. But they have no authority to decide which rights to take away and they don't speak for everybody. Rights are easier to give up than they are to get back. Better to live with the devil you know.

I've never been in the clergy, stood on a public soapbox, or run a newspaper business.

Like you, that doesn't mean I don't appreciate and accept the Rights of people who do.

Those who advocate for gun control in denial of the 2nd amendment's clear and unambiguous mandate would have the same disregard for your (and my) other Rights too.

 

[HisArpy]

So I guess the 2nd means you can bare your arms.

^LADIES, take note. It's almost summer time so get those sun dresses ready and bare your arms. (And shoulders and legs too.)

 

[Politruk]

Sure it does. 2A was supposed to prevent government tyranny.

That is a lie.

 

[Politruk]

So I guess the 2nd means you can bare your arms.

No, stupid, it means you can arm bears!

 

[MusicForTheDeaf]

 

[HisArpy]

No, stupid, it means you can arm bears!

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DEYOF-oXgAEH3io.jpg

 

[rgraham666]

View attachment 2531056

Reminds me of this video.

 

[Bray123]

I've never been in the clergy, stood on a public soapbox, or run a newspaper business.

Like you, that doesn't mean I don't appreciate and accept the Rights of people who do.

Those who advocate for gun control in denial of the 2nd amendment's clear and unambiguous mandate would have the same disregard for your (and my) other Rights too.

And you've never worked in a secure government environment but you feel that you know what passes for a secure form of communication suitable for government discussions.

 

[Politruk]

And you've never worked in a secure government environment but you feel that you know what passes for a secure form of communication suitable for government discussions.

Generally they use Control's Cone of Silence.

 

[HisArpy]

And you've never worked in a secure government environment

And you know this, how?

Because;
<--- is former military. Which once again shows how much you LIE in order to spew your narrative.

but you feel that you know what passes for a secure form of communication suitable for government discussions.

I know that if command authorizes a communications channel, then it's an authorized communications channel even if someone else can listen in. What blows me away is that you don't realize or understand that there's NO communication channel that can't be hacked. Even a hardline is subject to eavesdropping.

 

[Politruk]

What blows me away is that you don't realize or understand that there's NO communication channel that can't be hacked. Even a hardline is subject to eavesdropping.

But some are more secure than others -- and a cell phone is on the least-secure end of that spectrum -- and a SecDef should know that.

 

[HisArpy]

But some are more secure than others -- and a cell phone is on the least-secure end of that spectrum -- and a SecDef should know that.

It doesn't matter. The NSA sweeps all frequencies constantly and records everything.

Do you think other nations don't do the same? Do you think those nations don't have the ability to decipher what they sweep up even if it's encrypted?

Don't be a bigger fool than you already are.

 

[xxkimberlyv]

The 2nd amendment DOES NOT protect your right to own an AR-15.

These are extremely dangerous military-style weapons that ONLY THE MILITARY should have access to!

Not that I disagree with you but how is an AR-15 any different than a semi automatic hunting rifle of the same caliber? They both only shoot as fast as you can pull the trigger over and over. The difference is the capacity of the magazine and the scary black plastic on the AR.

 

[HisArpy]

Not that I disagree with you but how is an AR-15 any different than a semi automatic hunting rifle of the same caliber? They both only shoot as fast as you can pull the trigger over and over. The difference is the capacity of the magazine and the scary black plastic on the AR.

There isn't any difference in magazine capacity. In some states magazines are limited to 10 rounds while in others there's no limit.

The entire narrative stems from ONE SOURCE, Diane Feinstein. Cite While she was President of the SF Board of Supervisors, Harvey Milk was assassinated by another County Supervisor named Dan White who used an AR15 to rampage through the building. She made it her life's mission to outlaw the scary black rifles used that day in November 1978 and used her elected pulpit to push her personal agenda.

Many of you who spew the "evil black rifle" narrative don't even know why, you only follow along like nice little sheep. Because it's easy and takes no energy to be stupid. Yet a study was just done that shows CCW permit holders on the scene when mass shootings begin, stop them before more loss of life can occur. Had there been ONE of them in the building when White started shooting, maybe Harvey Milk (first openly gay elected official) would have survived.

But oh noes, evil black rifles are so bad that NO ONE can have any gun at all. Because Diane Feinstein said so and spent her entire life brainwashing YOU to get you to agree with her.

 

[xxkimberlyv]

My magazine reference was to what you might buy them with new. For instance Remington 700 is new with 5 to 10 rounds. AR is 30. And of course you can get pretty much anything off the Internet

And just for clarity I am not one of the spewers

 

[Politruk]

There isn't any difference in magazine capacity. In some states magazines are limited to 10 rounds while in others there's no limit.

N.B.: When they start talking about banning assault rifles, and you start nitpicking the definition of "assault rifle," that makes you the asshole.

 

[Bray123]

And you know this, how?

Because;
<--- is former military. Which once again shows how much you LIE in order to spew your narrative.



I know that if command authorizes a communications channel, then it's an authorized communications channel even if someone else can listen in. What blows me away is that you don't realize or understand that there's NO communication channel that can't be hacked. Even a hardline is subject to eavesdropping.

Official communications have to be retained for the National Archives. Signal deletes the posts. Therefore it is incompatible, but you do not know this basic fact.

It is you who are LYING.

 

[Bray123]

N.B.: When they start talking about banning assault rifles, and you start nitpicking the definition of "assault rifle," that makes you the asshole.

He doesn't like guns that are black. He's a MAGAT.

 

[Typo Fu Master]

Keep this in mind, it matters.

No, there isn't, actually. It's an NRA publication. From way back, when the organization was mainly about gun safety and marksmanship.

So it's a management issue for you?

You have no problem with civilians owning AR-15s, but you think we've lost focus on the important things, like gun safety? And how to handle the inevitable situations that arise in a country that has the Constitutional Right to bear arms?

 

[Politruk]

You have no problem with civilians owning AR-15s

Not at all. No civilian has any legitimate use for that kind of firepower.

 

[Typo Fu Master]

Not at all. No civilian has any legitimate use for that kind of firepower.

But it's still ok if they have one? I have no legitimate use for one. I'm still allowed to have one. You have no problem with it while expressing an opinion that you have a problem with it.