That's an awfully large petard you're building

RUlookingup

Literotica Lover
Joined
Apr 16, 2008
Posts
19,134
Watching our media attack Trump is something so historical it is comical. First they helped to create him, now they try to destroy him. It should only make him grow stronger. The more the media tries to take him down, the more popularity he will gain. You see everybody knows the media are.liars. It is the classic hoisting by one's own petard. Pilot any thoughts on this one?
 
Other than that you're a limited-vocabulary yutz (and don't understand the meaning of half of the phrases you use or what you observe)? Ummm, no. :D
 
Other than that you're a limited-vocabulary yutz (and don't understand the meaning of half of the phrases you use or what you observe)? Ummm, no. :D

Always nice to roust the putz pilot from his unaffected lair.
 
Watching our media attack Trump is something so historical it is comical. First they helped to create him, now they try to destroy him. It should only make him grow stronger. The more the media tries to take him down, the more popularity he will gain. You see everybody knows the media are.liars. It is the classic hoisting by one's own petard. Pilot any thoughts on this one?
You have it backwards. The media didn't create Trump, they just openly mocked him. They are still mocking him, even though he will very likely destroy himself and the Republican Party as well.
So if anyone is hoisted by their own petard it will be Trump and the Republicans for backing him.
Mutually assured destruction.
 
You have it backwards. -
Mutually assured destruction.

"Dr. Strangelove, paging Dr. Strangelove!"

I've been watching House of Cards, and reflecting on the Trump et al prancing around. Its would be fucking hilarious, if it wasn't a matter of life or death for the Country and the Planet.

I believe Syria, and "the battle of Armageddon" may be Hillary's Petard.

God Help us all.
 
There's no monolithic "the media" forcing anything down people's throats. It's a ridiculous idea.

Even if every single media outlet was owned by one person, there would still be varieties of programming, genres and slants. The main goal is to please the sponsors and get as many people as possible to watch or listen. If playing both sides of a fence will reach that goal, they'll do it.
 
There's no monolithic "the media" forcing anything down people's throats. It's a ridiculous idea.

Even if every single media outlet was owned by one person, there would still be varieties of programming, genres and slants. The main goal is to please the sponsors and get as many people as possible to watch or listen. If playing both sides of a fence will reach that goal, they'll do it.
As.long as Arianna Huffington keep covering Donald Trump under entertainment.
 
There's no monolithic "the media" forcing anything down people's throats. It's a ridiculous idea.

Even if every single media outlet was owned by one person, there would still be varieties of programming, genres and slants. The main goal is to please the sponsors and get as many people as possible to watch or listen. If playing both sides of a fence will reach that goal, they'll do it.

You keep believing that.
 
Back
Top