Ten Stupid Things FemSubs Do

Lancecastor

Lit's Most Beloved Poster
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
54,670
Wandered into this and thought it might make for good discussion...I've seen people do most of these things...have you?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
TEN STUPID THINGS
THAT FEMSUBS DO
TO MESS UP THEIR LIVES

borrowed from
COME HITHER: A Commonsense Guide to Kinky Sex.
Chapter Twelve--The View from the Bottom: Sexual Submissives

1. They discover they're sub on Monday, go looking for a maledom on Tuesday, and have their first experience on Wednesday.

2. They don't bother to learn before doing.

3. They believe everything that dominants tell them.

4. They believe nothing that dominants tell them.

5. They get so hungry for submission, they submit to anyone who wants them.

6. They agree to be an Internet correspondent's slave before meeting him in person.

7. They make a lifetime commitment to someone before spending a significant amount of time with him.

8. They measure a maledom only by his ability to turn them on, and not by any real-world considerations.

9. They lie about themselves to dominants.

10. They ignore the advice in this chapter.
 
Lancecastor said:
10. They ignore the advice in this chapter.

Ahh, gotta love strong logic. X is so because if you don't believe X is so then you're stupid.

Almost like the ontological argument for the existence of God...if you buy into the premises, you're sunk. "I can imagine a perfect God. A thing is more perfect if it exists. Therefore, God must exist." Riiiight. I can imagine a perfect sandwich too.

Other than that, I agree strongly with most of those...but then again, there's such a thing as "discrepancy."
 
Lance, this ought to be given to femsubs everywhere. I've seen people make all of these mistakes. I know one, in particular, who has a penchant for doing several of these at once with her particular Dom of the week. (nope, it is not anyone here so don't ask).

We've even talked about it. She generally says "this time it will be different." Then she wanders off and repeats the process again.
 
dumbinants & sumbitchen

Every word you type is a black arrow through the heart of false domination.
 
Lancecastor said:
Wandered into this and thought it might make for good discussion...I've seen people do most of these things...have you?


5. They get so hungry for submission, they submit to anyone who wants them.



Who wants to be my flavor of the month?

:D
 
made a few of these missteps myself, a time or two. Try hard not to repeat them.
 
I have to admit that my first time was rather hasty. I was lucky he turned out to be a good man with the best of intentions for me.
 
I have seen many subs and yes, Doms do the same things.

OF course, for Doms the safety factor may not be as great, or shouldn't be.

I haven't.

Thanks to this board and it's posters, new and old as well as to my own common sense.

Anybody want to turn this into a hug thread with me?

;)
 
I'd be surprised if most of us haven't made at least one of those mistakes. I'm just not admitting which one I did.
 
Desdemona said:
I'd be surprised if most of us haven't made at least one of those mistakes. I'm just not admitting which one I did.

yes Des, I am with you. I am admitting to nothing more than, I've made a few mistakes.....
 
Oops

I may have lied.

I did get involved with a Dom before meeting him. He wanted me to call him Master and all that stuff. I may have even done so for a day or two.

I also let him talk about his plans for the future.

When meeting him, though, it was as if meeting anyone. It was more of a "Let's see what happens" thingy, rather than a "You are the man of my dreams" thingy.
 
Re: Re: Ten Stupid Things FemSubs Do

I was going to leave #10 off, as obviously it's a book plug....but 9 Stupid things sounded ....stupid...

Quint said:


Ahh, gotta love strong logic. X is so because if you don't believe X is so then you're stupid.

Almost like the ontological argument for the existence of God...if you buy into the premises, you're sunk. "I can imagine a perfect God. A thing is more perfect if it exists. Therefore, God must exist." Riiiight. I can imagine a perfect sandwich too.

Other than that, I agree strongly with most of those...but then again, there's such a thing as "discrepancy."
 
Re: Re: Re: Ten Stupid Things FemSubs Do

Lancecastor said:
I was going to leave #10 off, as obviously it's a book plug....but 9 Stupid things sounded ....stupid...


Right. Not the type of plug that belongs on this forum, anyway.

Now, if you'll excuse me, I have a sandwich to eat.
 
Miss T, I think Lance needs a hug. Don't you? Hey Rose and Ruby, lets gang up on him! Quint, if you want, you can join in the group hug when you finish eating.:p
 
Re: Re: Ten Stupid Things FemSubs Do

Quint said:


Ahh, gotta love strong logic. X is so because if you don't believe X is so then you're stupid.

Almost like the ontological argument for the existence of God...if you buy into the premises, you're sunk. "I can imagine a perfect God. A thing is more perfect if it exists. Therefore, God must exist." Riiiight. I can imagine a perfect sandwich too.

Other than that, I agree strongly with most of those...but then again, there's such a thing as "discrepancy."

Thats not the ontological argument.
 
ohhhhh Lance

I am peeing my pants now....... this has got to be the funniest thing I have seen in ages......I think you have outdone yourself, pal. <high fivin' you- no hugs from me>
 
Last edited:
Re: ohhhhh Lance

A Desert Rose said:
I am peeing my pants now....... this has got to be the funniest thing I have seen in ages......I think you have outdone yourself, pal. <high fivin' you>
LOL!
Rose, I keep telling you... kegel excercises are your friend. They help you truly enjoy threads like this.
 
Re: Re: Re: Ten Stupid Things FemSubs Do

Marquis said:


Thats not the ontological argument.

Yes it is. St. Anselm was the earliest proponent of the ontological argument, which is stated, more clearly:

1.) I have, within my understanding, an idea of God.
2.) This idea of God is the idea of a being that is the greatest that can be conceived.
3.) A being is greater if it exists in reality than if it exists only in the understanding.
4.) If God exists in the understanding alone, then a greater being can be conceived, namely one that also exists in reality.
5.) Premise 4 is a contradiction, for it says that I can conceive of a greater being than the greatest possible being.
6.) So if I have an idea of the greatest conceivable being, such a being must exist both in my understanding and in reality.
7.) Therefore, God exists.

(Taken directly from William Lawhead's "The Philosophical Journey." Remind me why I didn't sell this back?)

Sorry for the abbreviated version, as I'm pretty sure that's what threw you. Also sorry for hijacking this thread. A worthy subject. Ahem...

*watches the Lanceluvin with some envy, but turns back to her perfect sandwich*
 
I thought....

that this was a sensible thread, where a chap could relax without the risk of being unexpectedly hugged ??


Now simmer down ladies...or I will have to discipline you !


:)
Dave
 
Back
Top