Calamity Jane
Reverend Blue Jeans
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2001
- Posts
- 18,421
Do you think more people would get married... and stay married... if it was a temporary arrangement?
Let's say you sign a marriage contract for a 5 year term. At the end of 5 years, you have the option of renewal or the option of walking away with 50% of the assests accrued during the marriage. Both partners know going into the contract that it's for a limited term. Support for the children of any union is agreed upon prior to their births... each parent providing 50%, with monetary values applied to physical custody.
You don't have to worry about waking up one morning and thinking "Oh, my god. This is the person I'm going to wake up with for the next 50 years."
Makes sense to me biologically too. There would be more options for diversity in the gene pool if we didn't stay with the same people forever and ever.
Let's say you sign a marriage contract for a 5 year term. At the end of 5 years, you have the option of renewal or the option of walking away with 50% of the assests accrued during the marriage. Both partners know going into the contract that it's for a limited term. Support for the children of any union is agreed upon prior to their births... each parent providing 50%, with monetary values applied to physical custody.
You don't have to worry about waking up one morning and thinking "Oh, my god. This is the person I'm going to wake up with for the next 50 years."
Makes sense to me biologically too. There would be more options for diversity in the gene pool if we didn't stay with the same people forever and ever.
