I
Iceprincess12
Guest
I am sure this is just the precurser to the zombie apocalypse. I will be monitoring this thread for important updates!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Tell me why the weather has become so destructive!
The secret is the weather has NOT become appreciably worse.
We do have severe storms periodically but they are rare. Your local news tends to hype any storm to boost the "Global Warming" fantasy. Name almost ANY storm, I'll name an old storm that was worse.
Here in NC we have only had 1 hurricane in the last 8 years.
The “State of the Climate,” released annually by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, found that 2014 was a record year for extreme weather: the "warmest year across global land and ocean surfaces since records began in 1880." In other words, it was the hottest year ever recorded on Earth. This year is shaping up to be no different, as 2015 has seen record-breaking heat, cold, precipitation, and drought. Here's a running list of this year's frightening new milestones.
January
Globally, January was the second warmest on record, and the sea ice cover in the Arctic was at its third smallest.
February
Boston endured 64.8 inches of snow, the snowiest month in the city's history. The last of the snow didn't melt until July.
March
New York and Vermont experienced record cold temperatures for the first three months of the year, beating records set almost a century ago.
April
California snowpack shrunk to record low levels, as a result of drought and warmer winter temperatures.
South Dakota had its driest January to April ever, reaching a mere 42 percent of its average precipitation for early spring.
May
Alaska had its warmest May on record.
Florida had its hottest March to May ever.
Tropical Storm Ana, when it made landfall in South Carolina, became the second-earliest tropical cyclone to hit the U.S. in recorded history.
Oklahoma and Texas had their wettest month of any month on record, with widespread flooding across the region.
June
Illinois, Indiana, and Ohio had their wettest June on record.
Pakistan suffered its deadliest heat wave ever, with the death toll topping 1,100. The heat index peaked at 121 degrees.
California, Idaho, Oregon, Utah, and Washington all had their hottest June ever.
So did the Earth.
In fact, the first six months combined were the hottest ever. Combined with the last six months of 2014, it was the hottest 12-year stretch in 136 years of record-keeping.
July
A heat wave brought record temperatures across Europe, as Germany hit an all-time high of 104.5 degrees.
Due to Tropical Storm Dolores, California received more rain over a single weekend than it did during the entire month of January, usually the state’s rainiest month.
Storm Frank: Freak weather to hit UK and could make North Pole 50F hotter than normal
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/s...0-50-degrees-hotter-than-normal-a6789916.html
NewsScience
Storm Frank: Freak weather to hit UK and could make North Pole 50F hotter than normal
One commentator described the temperature changes as being ‘as odd as witnessing Hell freezing over"
With those strange northern weather events will come an Icelandic storm that might be among the most vigorous ever, according to the Washington Post.
The North Pole is estimated to reach freezing or 32F (0C) early Wednesday morning, according to the Washington Post. If the temperatures get that high, it would be around 50F hotter than the usual temperature, which is around 20F below zero (-29C), the paper reported.
The climate and environment blogger described seeing such temperatures in December as being “as odd as witnessing Hell freezing over”.
“But, in this case, the latest wave of warmth issuing from a human-driven shift toward climatological hell appears to be on schedule to arrive at the North Pole in just a few more days,” he wrote.
As of 2014, it's estimated that nearly half of Americans—49 percent—say natural disasters are a sign of "the end times," as described in the Bible. That's up from an estimated 44 percent in 2011.
Americans' Explanations for Recent Natural Disasters, by Religious Affiliation
Fuck Texas. There's a foot of snow in Mexico.I'll be glued to the weather channel for the latest updates. Snow in Texas you say....outrageous.
Ciudad Juarez (Mexico) (AFP) - Some roads remained closed in northern Mexico on Monday after the biggest snow storm in more than half a century blanketed parts of the region, authorities said.
The weekend snowfall covered 32 towns in the state of Chihuahua, which borders the US states of Texas and New Mexico, with some places hit by accumulations of 30 centimeters (12 inches) and temperatures of minus-18 Celsius (zero Fahrenheit).
I think that anyone who can't see that the weather is getting increasingly more violent across the globe with increasing frequency has their head firmly planted in their ass. Or is a Republican (which is more or less the same thing).
What are you going to do about it?
Ohhhh that's right, nothing.
Go stare at yourself in the mirror a bit more, you may almost be able to fool yourself that you look like your avatar.
I see you've gone cherry picking. At least you acknowledge that warming has taken place.Global Warming, Climate Change, AGW, Abrupt Climate Change, Global Cooling
All of the above have been claimed at one point or another since the 80's.
Unfortunately, this subject has become a religion on the left and within the media. The "Science" is proven regardless of the weather. Lots of snow - Global Warming. Floods - Climate Change. Tornados, Hurricanes, Earthquakes - if they happen at all...it's due to AGW.
Obviously, I'm a skeptic. That statement alone will bring on the name-calling, derision and insults, which reinforces my skepticism. When all else fails...call people names. That is exactly the behavior seen within the climate change community. Toe the line...or else.
Surface temperature data is crap and the climate models are almost universally wrong. 95% of Climate models incorrectly predicted the weather. No surprise, they predicted more warming than actually took place.
http://thefederalist.com/2014/05/06/climate-change-is-real-too-bad-accurate-climate-models-arent/
Satellite and Surface Data diverge. Even Michael Mann has admitted there's a pause in "warming"...but wait...it's a 'false pause'.
http://thefederalist.com/2015/03/30/grasping-for-pause-ible-deniability-on-climate-change/
NOAA produces crap for data. It's manipulated and compromised. The very fact that a public agency won't disclose information to congress is indicative of how 'in the tank' they are for Climate Change.
http://dailycaller.com/2015/06/04/n...a-to-erase-the-15-year-global-warming-hiatus/
http://dailycaller.com/2014/06/30/noaa-quietly-reinstates-july-1936-as-the-hottest-month-on-record/
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2015/06/...mpt-to-create-warming-by-adjusting-past-data/
Bottom line: If you're on the left - you believe. There's no room for dissent, so you really have no choice.
If you're in the center or on the right - you mostly roll your eyes.
Last Point....unless China or India or the developing nations cut back on their emissions...NOTHING we do in the US will matter. But, but, but....the US can be a "global leader"...tell that to China who's building a new coal plant almost every month. Tell that to India, a country with 1.2 billion people.
The agenda behind climate change is control....that's it...a naked power grab.
Your "95% of climate models" claim was straight from the Federalist, which charted the UAH satellite data for proof, not the surface data.The warming, if any has taken place, is due to natural planetary fluctuations. That's it.
Two things about the data:
First, the changes in the satellite data is captured in your chart. Is there any indication that temperature readings taken decades ago is adjusted to be 'cooler' and recent temperature readers are adjusted to be higher....no surprise...showing warming?
Second, where are the adjustments to the surface data? Surely, they're available in a similar chart. The methodology, the rational, where is that for surface data?
Finally, my articles about NOAA was intended to spotlight their 'behavior'....more than the data. It's hard to assert cherry-picking when i post all my links....