Ted Hughes and Sylvia Plath

bronzeage

I am a river to my people
Joined
Jun 20, 2005
Posts
49,685
This is a poem written by Ted Hughes after the suicide of his wife, Sylvia Plath. The piece was written soon after her death, but never published until it was found in his archives, in 2010.


Last Letter by Ted Hughes

What happened that night? Your final night.
Double, treble exposure
Over everything. Late afternoon, Friday,
My last sight of you alive.
Burning your letter to me, in the ashtray,
With that strange smile. Had I bungled your plan?
Had it surprised me sooner than you purposed?
Had I rushed it back to you too promptly?
One hour later—-you would have been gone
Where I could not have traced you.
I would have turned from your locked red door
That nobody would open
Still holding your letter,
A thunderbolt that could not earth itself.
That would have been electric shock treatment
For me.
Repeated over and over, all weekend,
As often as I read it, or thought of it.
That would have remade my brains, and my life.
The treatment that you planned needed some time.
I cannot imagine
How I would have got through that weekend.
I cannot imagine. Had you plotted it all?

Your note reached me too soon—-that same day,
Friday afternoon, posted in the morning.
The prevalent devils expedited it.
That was one more straw of ill-luck
Drawn against you by the Post-Office
And added to your load. I moved fast,
Through the snow-blue, February, London twilight.
Wept with relief when you opened the door.
A huddle of riddles in solution. Precocious tears
That failed to interpret to me, failed to divulge
Their real import. But what did you say
Over the smoking shards of that letter
So carefully annihilated, so calmly,
That let me release you, and leave you
To blow its ashes off your plan—-off the ashtray
Against which you would lean for me to read
The Doctor’s phone-number.
My escape
Had become such a hunted thing
Sleepless, hopeless, all its dreams exhausted,
Only wanting to be recaptured, only
Wanting to drop, out of its vacuum.
Two days of dangling nothing. Two days gratis.
Two days in no calendar, but stolen
From no world,
Beyond actuality, feeling, or name.

My love-life grabbed it. My numbed love-life
With its two mad needles,
Embroidering their rose, piercing and tugging
At their tapestry, their bloody tattoo
Somewhere behind my navel,
Treading that morass of emblazon,
Two mad needles, criss-crossing their stitches,
Selecting among my nerves
For their colours, refashioning me
Inside my own skin, each refashioning the other
With their self-caricatures,

Their obsessed in and out. Two women
Each with her needle.

That night
My dellarobbia Susan. I moved
With the circumspection
Of a flame in a fuse. My whole fury
Was an abandoned effort to blow up
The old globe where shadows bent over
My telltale track of ashes. I raced
From and from, face backwards, a film reversed,
Towards what? We went to Rugby St
Where you and I began.
Why did we go there? Of all places
Why did we go there? Perversity
In the artistry of our fate
Adjusted its refinements for you, for me
And for Susan. Solitaire
Played by the Minotaur of that maze
Even included Helen, in the ground-floor flat.
You had noted her—-a girl for a story.
You never met her. Few ever met her,
Except across the ears and raving mask
Of her Alsatian. You had not even glimpsed her.
You had only recoiled
When her demented animal crashed its weight
Against her door, as we slipped through the hallway;
And heard it choking on infinite German hatred.

That Sunday night she eased her door open
Its few permitted inches.
Susan greeted the black eyes, the unhappy
Overweight, lovely face, that peeped out
Across the little chain. The door closed.
We heard her consoling her jailor
Inside her cell, its kennel, where, days later,
She gassed her ferocious kupo, and herself.

Susan and I spent that night
In our wedding bed. I had not seen it
Since we lay there on our wedding day.
I did not take her back to my own bed.
It had occurred to me, your weekend over,
You might appear—-a surprise visitation.
Did you appear, to tap at my dark window?
So I stayed with Susan, hiding from you,
In our own wedding bed—-the same from which
Within three years she would be taken to die
In that same hospital where, within twelve hours,
I would find you dead.
Monday morning
I drove her to work, in the City,
Then parked my van North of Euston Road
And returned to where my telephone waited.

What happened that night, inside your hours,
Is as unknown as if it never happened.
What accumulation of your whole life,
Like effort unconscious, like birth
Pushing through the membrane of each slow second
Into the next, happened
Only as if it could not happen,
As if it was not happening. How often
Did the phone ring there in my empty room,
You hearing the ring in your receiver—-
At both ends the fading memory
Of a telephone ringing, in a brain
As if already dead. I count
How often you walked to the phone-booth
At the bottom of St George’s terrace.
You are there whenever I look, just turning
Out of Fitzroy Road, crossing over
Between the heaped up banks of dirty sugar.
In your long black coat,
With your plait coiled up at the back of your hair
You walk unable to move, or wake, and are
Already nobody walking
Walking by the railings under Primrose Hill
Towards the phone booth that can never be reached.
Before midnight. After midnight. Again.
Again. Again. And, near dawn, again.

At what position of the hands on my watch-face
Did your last attempt,
Already deeply past
My being able to hear it, shake the pillow
Of that empty bed? A last time
Lightly touch at my books, and my papers?
By the time I got there my phone was asleep.
The pillow innocent. My room slept,
Already filled with the snowlit morning light.
I lit my fire. I had got out my papers.
And I had started to write when the telephone
Jerked awake, in a jabbering alarm,
Remembering everything. It recovered in my hand.
Then a voice like a selected weapon
Or a measured injection,
Coolly delivered its four words
Deep into my ear: ‘Your wife is dead.’
 
Source please?

It seems maybe internet faked, though it reminded me of Pablo:


"...I no longer love her, that's certain, but maybe I love her.
Love is so short, forgetting is so long.

Because through nights like this one I held her in my arms
my soul is not satisfied that it has lost her.

Though this be the last pain that she makes me suffer
and these the last verses that I write for her."
 
Source please?

It seems maybe internet faked, though it reminded me of Pablo:


"...I no longer love her, that's certain, but maybe I love her.
Love is so short, forgetting is so long.

Because through nights like this one I held her in my arms
my soul is not satisfied that it has lost her.

Though this be the last pain that she makes me suffer
and these the last verses that I write for her."

It's all too real. Ted Hughes was the Poet Laureate of Great Britain from 1984 until he died in 1998. Although he published other poems about his relationship with Sylvia Plath, this particular piece was kept secret.
 
I don't mean to be mean, WBY, but I found this in perhaps ten seconds.

I think The New York Review of Books and, by reference, The New Statesman are pretty good sources.

The poem is pretty important to anyone who has ever read Plath or Hughes and cared about their story. I was surprised that I hadn't read the text 'til yesterday on Lit. I heard that it may have existed for the past couple years around the release of Birthday Letters, but the stories never included the full text. The Review article is from 2010 so I'm interested in why I missed it for years. If you stumble upon any other sources I wouldn't feel offended if you posted those too.
 
Thank you Bronzeage for posting this poem. I might not have seen this for quite a while. And thanks Tzara for the NYR review. Yes, these two Hughes and Plath have intrigued many of us, their lives as well their poetry. And this one in particular has some memorable lines, indeed.

Thanks once again...
 
Really interesting to finally hear a bit of his perspective on this time. Very sad poem. Thank you for posting it, BA.
 
To be honest, I think this is one of the worst Hughes poems I have ever read. It really reads like it is a PR piece to keep the raging fallopians and the accusing cult of witches at bay. I don't think Hughes is at his best when he is writing about Plath, I think his poems about her are largely dishonest in the sense they feel to me, like they come out of a sense of guilt or duty, rather than genuine feelings of affection. By all accounts she drove him mad and her choosing him for happy families was always going to end in disappointment. Hughes was a womaniser before Plath chose him and tried to change him, it was never going to happen. He was what he was, a womaniser because so many women wanted to bed him and like most men in that position when they have a psychotic woman in tow, they can't say because they need the relief of someone else in their life.

I wrote a poem about it once.

Hughes is a far better poet when he is writing about the cold indifference of nature. A real contrast to Plath's passionate confessionals.
 
Last edited:
The poem is pretty important to anyone who has ever read Plath or Hughes and cared about their story. I was surprised that I hadn't read the text 'til yesterday on Lit. I heard that it may have existed for the past couple years around the release of Birthday Letters, but the stories never included the full text. The Review article is from 2010 so I'm interested in why I missed it for years. If you stumble upon any other sources I wouldn't feel offended if you posted those too.

I empathize with the tragedy of their being and ending, but their poetry made me want to committ suicide. Not a fan..... and that particular poem reads more like a boring, guilt-ridden, "what could I have done?" short story.

But hey, he was Poet Laureate, so who am I to not like his/ her/ their works... although I have read some of His that I liked, but Sylvia has yet to touch me in that "special" place.

The poet laureate we have here in SC was appointed by ex governor, oh, what was his name? That Republilcan that cheated on his lovely wife with a South american bombshell.....

Her nameis Marjory something or other ( maybe Wentworth?) and she's lucky she had friends in high places. There are so many talented poets here in the south, well, all over, but I think he could have done better..... ( not being mean, just my opinion)

There are plenty of folks here who could out write her in their sleep. ( and I'm not one of them, but I can think of at least 6....)

:devil:
 
Oh my goodness, Bogus, after I posted the one above, I went on to read the other opinions and saw yours, oh boy, I am glad I'm not alone in how I felt about that poem.... I know how people can feel about their faves, especially when someone else doesn't see t he magic that they see.

How in the world have you been? Well I hope :)

Take care of them barkin' dogs;)


~ maria


ps, that "psychotic woman in tow" thing you said....have you been talking to my hubby? :D
 
Last edited:
Did he write as eloquently about Assia?

I read his Birthday Letters & Crow but nothing of Assia or the daughter who died with her. I've always wondered if he were the victim or the cause of the two tragedies. I'd read a biography but am unsure which one of the several is the truth.

Frieda Hughes, Sylvia & Ted's daughter is a very good poet, well worth reading, by the way.
 
Last edited:
To be honest, I think this is one of the worst Hughes poems I have ever read. It really reads like it is a PR piece to keep the raging fallopians and the accusing cult of witches at bay. I don't think Hughes is at his best when he is writing about Plath, I think his poems about her are largely dishonest in the sense they feel to me, like they come out of a sense of guilt or duty, rather than genuine feelings of affection. By all accounts she drove him mad and her choosing him for happy families was always going to end in disappointment. Hughes was a womaniser before Plath chose him and tried to change him, it was never going to happen. He was what he was, a womaniser because so many women wanted to bed him and like most men in that position when they have a psychotic woman in tow, they can't say because they need the relief of someone else in their life.

I wrote a poem about it once.

Hughes is a far better poet when he is writing about the cold indifference of nature. A real contrast to Plath's passionate confessionals.

I haven't read enough Hughes poetry to say if this is one of his worst pieces. But, having been in a similar situation, the poem struck me as being painfully true to life. Fortunately for my Sylvia and myself, I was there and interrupted
her suicide attempt.

I can forgive Ted Hughes for being less than what Sylvia needed at that point in her life, but that is to forgive him for being less than perfect. When someone looks at us and says, "Feed me or I will die," few of us have that kind of food in the pantry.
 
Oh my goodness, Bogus, after I posted the one above, I went on to read the other opinions and saw yours, oh boy, I am glad I'm not alone in how I felt about that poem.... I know how people can feel about their faves, especially when someone else doesn't see t he magic that they see.

I've been unable to buy into the Plath-Hughes myth on any level. The more I've read about them the more I realise it was a relationship that was always going to fail. He was a womaniser who had no intentions of changing, she was a psychotic on drugs who had a fairy tale image of him as being her domestic prince. It was never going to happen, it wasn't based on reality. Then there was both their selfish ambitions to be successful writers. I say selfish, not in a derogatory way but because to be successful in the arts, you have to be focused and that often means selfish.

How in the world have you been? Well I hope :)

Take care of them barkin' dogs;)


~ maria

I'm doing great. I have two exhibitions later this year which I'm working on now which is why I only get time to pop in nowandagain.

You seem jolly as ever!:rose:


ps, that "psychotic woman in tow" thing you said....have you been talking to my hubby? :D

You aren't driving your husband to drink are you?:eek:

And check out those Playboys in the garage?;)
 
I haven't read enough Hughes poetry to say if this is one of his worst pieces. But, having been in a similar situation, the poem struck me as being painfully true to life. Fortunately for my Sylvia and myself, I was there and interrupted
her suicide attempt.

But Ted wasn't there Bronze and from my reading, he probably wouldn't have been there if he could but then, suicide is a personal choice and no one else's decision, even if the person is temporarily detached from reality or some other reason. Being the other partner is tough because of the guilt it produces even if there is no reason to feel guilty.

He did comment after her suicide, one of them had to die. Of course that is open to interpretation and who knows what was in his head. From my reading about them and of course all writings about them are mythologised, I got the impression rather her than him but then, there is no such thing as an objective biography about them. In books I have read there has always seemed to be an underlying agenda that pollutes any attempt at the truth.
 
But Ted wasn't there Bronze and from my reading, he probably wouldn't have been there if he could but then, suicide is a personal choice and no one else's decision, even if the person is temporarily detached from reality or some other reason. Being the other partner is tough because of the guilt it produces even if there is no reason to feel guilty.


You know, if it was just Sylvia that might be a reasonable conclusion, but after Assia killed herself and their daughter you've got to wonder if perhaps he might rightfully feel some guilt. Either that or he was simply attracted to doomed souls.

Ironically, Sylvia and Ted's son killed himself in 2009.
 
But Ted wasn't there Bronze and from my reading, he probably wouldn't have been there if he could but then, suicide is a personal choice and no one else's decision, even if the person is temporarily detached from reality or some other reason. Being the other partner is tough because of the guilt it produces even if there is no reason to feel guilty.

He did comment after her suicide, one of them had to die. Of course that is open to interpretation and who knows what was in his head. From my reading about them and of course all writings about them are mythologised, I got the impression rather her than him but then, there is no such thing as an objective biography about them. In books I have read there has always seemed to be an underlying agenda that pollutes any attempt at the truth.

Truth is always a very ethereal substance. In any relationship, there is no one truth. Everyone has their own version and none is less true than another.

Ted may have been a selfish womanizing bastard, but what if he had been an ideal and devoted husband? Would it have cured Sylvia? What if he left her and remained celibate? In a day when there were no effective medicines for her problems, I don't think it would have made a difference.

My natural sympathies lie with Ted. If he didn't have what it took to deal with the situation, who did? The hero business is a rough gig and the rewards are exaggerated.
 
You know, if it was just Sylvia that might be a reasonable conclusion, but after Assia killed herself and their daughter you've got to wonder if perhaps he might rightfully feel some guilt. Either that or he was simply attracted to doomed souls.

Ironically, Sylvia and Ted's son killed himself in 2009.

Assia had a very unstable history before she even met Ted Hughes so you can't blame him for her psychosis.

As for his son, depression can be hereditary by all accounts, plus with all the negative publicity around, who knows. Feminists were vicious towards Ted Hughes and mounted a sustained hate campaign against him so you don't know how that affected the family.
 
Truth is always a very ethereal substance. In any relationship, there is no one truth. Everyone has their own version and none is less true than another.

Ted may have been a selfish womanizing bastard, but what if he had been an ideal and devoted husband? Would it have cured Sylvia? What if he left her and remained celibate? In a day when there were no effective medicines for her problems, I don't think it would have made a difference.

My natural sympathies lie with Ted. If he didn't have what it took to deal with the situation, who did? The hero business is a rough gig and the rewards are exaggerated.

I'm with you on that Bronze.

Though I think Ted had no intentions of playing the hero but then, what do we know?
 
Last edited:
Assia had a very unstable history before she even met Ted Hughes so you can't blame him for her psychosis.

So they were just suicides waiting to happen and Ted just got in the way? I can't help but think perhaps he might have given them a bit of a nudge.
 
Let's face it. Ted was a poet and we all know what they are like.

HAH! :D

But poets that are women often different story. I rarely meet women poets who are not idealists in some way or another. Seldom get that vibe from the men. Is that sexist? Meh.
 
HAH! :D

But poets that are women often different story. I rarely meet women poets who are not idealists in some way or another. Seldom get that vibe from the men. Is that sexist? Meh.

I sent a cherub
softly whispering in her ear,
well crafted words to
induce seductive visions,
wicked dreams of my desire.

Playing cupid’s part
poorly, though he looks the role
of the winged archer,
mosquitoes fly just as well
and lack cherubim conscience.

The message was his
mission, but he betrayed me,
steadfast for my love,
and sang not my love song,
And murmured this caveat,

Mind words a poet
spins, a deceiving spell cast
to ensnare your heart.
When your beauty is lusted,
poets may not be trusted.
 
So they were just suicides waiting to happen and Ted just got in the way? I can't help but think perhaps he might have given them a bit of a nudge.

I am sure you have read up on this as well as me, obviously you have. Plath was psychotic and self destructive before she met Hughes, as was Assia. Apparently, from what I have read anyway, Assia felt profoundly guilty over Sylvia's suicide so if you want to spread blame around, why not blame Sylvia?

Suicide is a choice, no one drives someone to suicide. People walk out of relationships and slam the door behind them every day and never throw themselves off a cliff but simply move on.

From what I have read and I accept there is no book about this affair without a hidden agenda, both Sylvia and Assia showed signs of being psychotic and depressives before Hughes arrived on the scene. Their promiscuity doesn't fit in with the pattern of someone with a high sex drive who just enjoys sex but along with other behaviours, fits in with a pattern of being manic depressives.

Given that most books in the Hughes and Plath genre set out to beatify Plath and vilify Hughes and Hughes remained silent, refusing to give his side of the story, I think most books fail to make the case because they can't escape the fact that Plath was psychotic before she met Hughes and she was overdosing popping pills. Sylvia and I suspect Assia were probably more victims of the drug industry than of Hughes.

As the Rolling Stones so eloquently put it.
 
If you are expressing that as personal experience, no. If you are expressing that as principle, yes.

Personal experience. I do sometimes meet male poet idealists (makes me swoon a little when I do). BJ Ward would be an example of this. Of course, he's happily married.

I think also that people with difficulties are often attracted to other people with difficulties so that these difficulties can be compounded into some giant co-dependent tragedy. Clearly, Ted and Sylvia were both troubled.
 
Back
Top