Untrue. You frequently are in those threads and defending Trump, er, Orange man bad!
Read up on the Pennsylvania incident where a judge overruled Penn voting laws and overruled state legislators.
Classic deflection!
The crime was horrendous, it was an emotional response. His one page add was more about violent crime not the color of anyone’s skin. But you like to inject race into everything.
It wasn’t baseless at the time. Trump has since reversed his statement. Politics is a blood sport. It wasn’t a racist rant as much as it was a political rant. You people call Trump a fascist, Hitler, a racist a Nazis so cry me a river!
Shouldn’t be any, most shouldn’t be here in the first place.
Who cares what party. I’m not disputing the use of the word. His actions speak volumes.
Trump says stupid shit and so doesn’t every president in history.
We as a nation compare outcomes against our own accomplishments not other countries.
Using that analogy there’s enough compelling circumstantial evidence that the Biden family is as corrupt as the day is long but because he’s connected no charges. Failure to impanel a grand jury doesn’t mean he’s not guilty, it’s because he’s connected and holds all the cards. He and Hillary both violated criminal statutes on several occasions but nothing. But Trump, a different story. 34 ridiculous felony convictions for bookkeeping errors, misdemeanors that outran the statute of limitations.
It’s a moral issue.
Democrats have stooped to this tactic against Kavanaugh, that’s what you do. Democrats have no ethical standards that they won’t trample on to stay in power.
Why would sentences be reduced for a certain race? Is that the new DEI?
Pushed by bipartisan advocacy groups; so I’ll take the lazy explanation;
ChtGPT didn't answer my question.
It's a possibility they were overcharged for possession and non-violent crimes.
What?
Whether law enforcement was over aggressive against the black community or the courts being strict with sentencing guidelines isn't my issue. Perhaps start a thread of your own. My argument was with YB and his accusations toward Trump being a racist.
You said that the Trump administration is changing things based on race.
Perhaps he was righting a wrong.
So you support racially applying preference.
I support applying the law fairly and equally across all races.
So giving preference to a certain race results in fair and equal application of the law?
People should be certified as teachers based on MERIT.
I don't believe there existed one case where there was factual evidence. The world has now had over four years to uncover any that might exist, and they have not.
Perhaps, but my point stands. Given that you are a white right-winger with a long history of racist comments, your opinion on why Trump gained among Black men and Latinos holds no water as far as I'm concerned. Of course there are reasons for those trends, but you're just seeing what you want to see.
It was five poor Black men accused of beating and raping an affluent white woman. The only way you could pretend race wasn't a factor in people's reaction to the case would be if you were either willfully dishonest with yourself about the realities of racism in America (that's my guess as far as you're concerned), or if you were just plain stupid (which admittedly is always a possibility with Trump).
Not a Trump initiative. He did sign it, but he not only wasn't the one who initiated the bill, he was initially opposed to it. You know why he changed his mind? Because his son in law lobbied Fox News to give it good coverage.
Introduced in Congress before Trump was elected, and died in committee. If I'm being very generous, you might be simply confusing that name with some other bill that did come to Trump's desk, but I doubt it.
That number is really quite low for four years.
And got even lower under Biden.
...is what you always say when anyone reminds you that oppression still exists in America today.
Yes, it was baseless at the time. There has never been a scintilla of evidence that Obama was born anywhere but Hawaii.
Surely you could uncover an example or two of this if that were true.
Are you really arguing that ICE never abuses migrants? Seriously?
If you're referring to their immigration status, that's a civil law issue, not a criminal one.
Next time you feel like whining about our side calling the Republicans fascists, keep in mind that idolizing the cops is a symptom of fascism.
Not because criminals are being removed, and you know it.
Seriously, turn off Fox News already. Go get some fresh air!
Who cares what party? You do, evidently. You're the one who brought that up. And yes, his actions - and words - do speak volumes.
That's rich coming from a guy who claimed Biden had dimentia every time he coughed.
In other words, you wouldn't have credited Biden for anything short of a miracle. Because that is what it would have taken to avoid any economic fallout whatsoever from the pandemic.
Wrong. Those 99% of rapists who never go to trial don't escape justice because they're connected (well, a few do, but most don't). They never go to trial because we live in a culture that tends to excuse that particular crime, as your own commentary about Justice Kavanaugh below proves.
Hillary Clinton is literally the most thoroughly investigated American in history, maybe the most in the world. It's been 35 years since she got under the right's skin for not staying home to bake cookies. If what you said were true, something would have come to light by now. As for Biden, his son was convicted.
They were not bookkeeping errors, it was systemic fraud.
Then any Trump supporter would do well to stay as far away from it as s/he can.
Thank you for at least showing your true colors here.
Wait, is that not happening?
