Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
JamesSD said:"Voters of America: You reap what you sow"
CopyCarver said:Sadly, we reap the votes that five Supreme Court Justices sowed--after one of them was bribed with a job for his son.
I like yours best, Swede. Though I think mine would certainly prick some ears (so long as he didn't misprounounce it, e.g., pronounce the 'H', ha ha ha).Svenskaflicka said:"D-uh..?"
perdita said:I like yours best, Swede. Though I think mine would certainly prick some ears (so long as he didn't misprounounce it, e.g., pronounce the 'H', ha ha ha).
Perdita
Colleen Thomas said:I'm so sick of this refrain.
The results in florida showed Bush winning by 500 plus votes. Florida's election law has provision for a statewide recount in elections that close. had the Democrats been confident they would win, they could have simply abided by the law. they were not, however, gains made in havily democratic districts like west palm would be enough to overcome similar expected gains for Bush in heavily Republican districts like Seminole. So they decided to try and count only the results in their districts. the Democratic state supreme court approved such a move and that, not anything Bush did, opened up an appeal in the federal courts because federal election law requires fairness to all candidates.
Even then, the Justices tried to stay out of it. they sent the decision back to the Florida Supreme court asking what they based the decision on and the Fla supreme court thumbed it's nose at SCOTUS. At that point, they did take a hand, but they didn't hand the election to Bush, they just outlined the parameters by which a recount could be done in accordance with federal election law.
I'm sick of seeing the supreme court banged by sore losers. Your candidate took it to the court system. And that court system upheld the idea elections have to be fair. You don't have to like Bush, but with a fairly evenly split court, it is apparent trying to do a selective recount was repudiated as unfair. Nothing more, nothing less.
I think they did a damn fine job when the role of kingmaker was thrust upon them. They chose not to. Which is what I would hope they would do.