Sub au natural

sister76

Not a Virgin
Joined
Jan 1, 1970
Posts
1,892
I would like being a sub, but don't like all the bullshit accoutremants. I like hand to hand. I like my man to dominate me in a real way - through his physical strength.
 
sister76 said:
I would like being a sub, but don't like all the bullshit accoutremants. I like hand to hand. I like my man to dominate me in a real way - through his physical strength.

uummm..Hmmm..even if He is using 'accoutrement's' doesn't He have to use His physical strength as well?? i mean, floggers don't just 'swing' themselves.... :rolleyes:
 
lil_slave_rose said:
uummm..Hmmm..even if He is using 'accoutrement's' doesn't He have to use His physical strength as well?? i mean, floggers don't just 'swing' themselves.... :rolleyes:

They don't? :eek:

*sob* You just broke all my illusions! :(

*runs from thread in tears*

I need a cookie.
 
graceanne said:
They don't? :eek:

*sob* You just broke all my illusions! :(

*runs from thread in tears*

I need a cookie.

awww poor gracie, i'm sowwy, i dinna mean to burst your bubble there and let you in on the secret *hands gracie cookies, and skips outta the thread*
 
lil_slave_rose said:
awww poor gracie, i'm sowwy, i dinna mean to burst your bubble there and let you in on the secret *hands gracie cookies, and skips outta the thread*

*sniff sniff*

I suppose it's ok. At least they can still read minds . . . right? right?
 
graceanne said:
*sniff sniff*

I suppose it's ok. At least they can still read minds . . . right? right?

*nods,nods* of course! i mean sheesh, you think they're just 'regular' Men or what? reading minds is of course a requirement to become a Dom :p
 
lil_slave_rose said:
*nods,nods* of course! i mean sheesh, you think they're just 'regular' Men or what? reading minds is of course a requirement to become a Dom :p

Oh . . .ok. *nibbles cookies*
 
sister76 said:
I would like being a sub, but don't like all the bullshit accoutremants. I like hand to hand. I like my man to dominate me in a real way - through his physical strength.

Different strokes for different folks, babe. There's someone out there for you, no matter what title you want to give yourself.

Personally, I'm like you are, and I don't believe at all in "natural submissives" (although i know people on the board disagree, and that's fine.) but I'm still submissive and I've still had satisfying relationships as a sub.

So, don't worry about titles.
 
The force of energy, that will push you into a little box, labelled 'whatever', is stronger in this lifestyle than a jedi convention.

Fuck em all, do what you want, how you want to, when you want to, to someone who wants you to and you wont go far wrong.

Ive been labelled. Taken a label, in the end, it didnt work out, i am too mecurial to sit in someones pigeon hole. Im 43, still dont know what word suits me. But 'me' sounds pretty cool.

pandoravampire
 
I've never understood these "non-question questions" and "non-discussion topics." :confused:
 
Etoile said:
I've never understood these "non-question questions" and "non-discussion topics." :confused:

i'm with you there Etoile *shrugs* start a thread to make one statement..no discussion, no question, just a statement...makes no sense to me either :confused:
 
sister76 said:
I would like being a sub, but don't like all the bullshit accoutremants. I like hand to hand. I like my man to dominate me in a real way - through his physical strength.

mental domination can be pretty powerful too, especially when paired with the physical, but hey.. thats just my opinion. your welcome to your own.

if you want to direct the conversation a bit though that would be helpful.
 
I like to be dominated through superior intellect and deadly amounts of charm, myself.
 
Netzach said:
I like to be dominated through superior intellect and deadly amounts of charm, myself.

Me too, le sigh. Though I also like crops and floggers. :p And bare hands. Paint brushes...
 
intothewoods said:
Me too, le sigh. Though I also like crops and floggers. :p And bare hands. Paint brushes...

If they're smart and charming enough I'll leave the methods up to them.

But seriously, there are few in this league. Whereas most people male or female could probably whip my butt if we're wrestling.

Fortunately for me, that's not my gig.
 
A picture paints a thousand words.........

sister76 said:
I would like being a sub, but don't like all the bullshit accoutremants. I like hand to hand. I like my man to dominate me in a real way - through his physical strength.

http://i28.photobucket.com/albums/c224/rebecca000/handtohand.jpg

While I can appreciate that 'hand to hand' HTH H2H combat poses some interesting challenges in regards to submission to one's Dominant, I am fairly certain I am sooooooooooo not up for the challenge. Particularly when the outcome is likely to be fatal (somewhere between a broken nail or my demise) , as in mêlée military combat or a duel. Knowing the calibre (cool wurd choice) of Dominant I have shared my time with in previous years I would be one squished and or deceased submissive . The use of filleting knives, pointy sticks, and rifles with bayonets has been a bit of a no no (hard limit) in prior relationships as well.

Having noted the above I concur with Netz , with "superior intellect and deadly amounts of charm" as the foundations of dominance I can be induced to a bit of a 'wrestle' however ........
 
Last edited:
sister76 said:
I would like being a sub, but don't like all the bullshit accoutremants. I like hand to hand. I like my man to dominate me in a real way - through his physical strength.
So, you want your guy to hold you down, but not tie you up? (As opposed, I suppose, holding you up by tying you down. :p) I found it's a lot harder to tie up a struggling girl than to just hold her down. So, tying up girls is more manly :devil: :D
 
While I can appreciate that 'hand to hand' HTH H2H combat poses some interesting challenges in regards to submission to one's Dominant, I am fairly certain I am sooooooooooo not up for the challenge. Particularly when the outcome is likely to be fatal (somewhere between a broken nail or my demise) , as in mêlée military combat or a duel. Knowing the calibre (cool wurd choice) of Dominant I have shared my time with in previous years I would be one squished and or deceased submissive . The use of filleting knives, pointy sticks, and rifles with bayonets has been a bit of a no no (hard limit) in prior relationships as well.

Having noted the above I concur with Netz , with "superior intellect and deadly amounts of charm" as the foundations of dominance I can be induced to a bit of a 'wrestle' however ........

This is the best post ever.
 
Tuomas said:
So, you want your guy to hold you down, but not tie you up? (As opposed, I suppose, holding you up by tying you down. :p) I found it's a lot harder to tie up a struggling girl than to just hold her down. So, tying up girls is more manly :devil: :D

Hmmm, I do like to be held down, and I have to admit, I did refer to it as "organic bondage." Ha ha ha ha. Now it seems funny, but at the time I was like, GENIUS! It must have been late or something. :eek:
 
Back
Top