G
Guest
Guest
.....
Last edited by a moderator:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Aurora Black said:Where was this show taped?
R. Richard said:The background says [something] Montreal.
Aurora Black said:I saw that, but I didn't want to believe it.![]()
thank god for that.Lauren Hynde said:The background says "Juste Pour Rire Montreal". It's the Just For Laughs comedy festival.
Did you see the video, though?vella_ms said:thank god for that.
i just lost 4:46 of my life to a woman with a nice body and funky facial expressions.
vella_ms said:thank god for that.
i just lost 4:46 of my life to a woman with a nice body and funky facial expressions.
Scalywag said:interesting, however I do wonder if a rabbit was once part of the show, but now she can't find it.
Straight-8 said:And as for the rabbit, I heard it was a beaver and is still magically on view if you look closely!
Zeb_Carter said:Oh and the disappearing red cloth wasn't bad either.![]()
It just takes practice, go get your scarves.McKenna said:By Jove, I think I saw it!
![]()
R. Richard said:Actually, the "disappearing red cloth" was NOT a cloth.
But that's exactly how I make my living...playing poker. I've made millions.R. Richard said:Actually, the "disappearing red cloth" was NOT a cloth. If you watch closely, you will notice that the lady always uses her right hand to prepare for the extraction of the red object by her left hand. It appears that she is using her right hand to open a pocket or compartment in her clothing. She is. You will then notice that she usually works her hands once she has hidden the red object. There is a reason for the working.
Zeb, I would suggest that you not try playing poker for high stakes. You really do not have the necessary skills. Just a friendly suggestion.
Aurora Black said:What was it, then?![]()
Zeb_Carter said:But that's exactly how I make my living...playing poker. I've made millions.
Or she could just glue on a latex palm pocket. Simpler.R. Richard said:If you look at the whole act, the "red cloth" actually disappears. The woman, especially in the final stages, has no practical place to hid the "red cloth." Thus, the "red cloth" is a substance that actually disappears. I don't claim to know exactly what the substance is, but it very probably disappears due to heat. If you have ever appeared on stage, you know how hot the lights are. Thus, the magician would have "red cloths" that were cooled down, probably in a refrigerator or on ice and then hidden within the performers clothing in insulated [more or less] pockets. Once the "red cloths" were removed from said pockets, they would begin to heat up. [You probably noticed that the performer always used the same two fingers of her left hand to hold the "red cloth. The fingers were also probably insulated, possibly with a clear spray coating. Thus, the performers fingers would not cause the "red cloth" to sublimate. Once in the performer's hand, the heat of her hand and the heat of the stage light environment would quickly cause the "red cloth" to sublimate. The performer could, of course, feel the material sublimate and would not "flash" her hands until the material had sublimated. Simple!