Strip this:

Aurora Black said:
I saw that, but I didn't want to believe it. :eek:

From what little I was able to get of the announcer's spiel, it seemed to be in a foreign language. Of course French is widely used in La Belle Province!
 
The background says "Juste Pour Rire Montreal". It's the Just For Laughs comedy festival.
 
Lauren Hynde said:
The background says "Juste Pour Rire Montreal". It's the Just For Laughs comedy festival.
thank god for that.
i just lost 4:46 of my life to a woman with a nice body and funky facial expressions.
 
vella_ms said:
thank god for that.
i just lost 4:46 of my life to a woman with a nice body and funky facial expressions.

Did you notice that the woman basically comes out on stage and does the same magic trick several times? In between magic tricks she removes four item of clothing. Along with removing the clothing she does a few bumps. However she never really dances and the strip would be impossibly lame without the magic tricks. However, the total effect is really rather entertaining!

JMHO.
 
Scalywag said:
interesting, however I do wonder if a rabbit was once part of the show, but now she can't find it.

Actually, the rabbit had to be sacrificed due to the old time medical procedures still in use in Canada.
 
Do you see that? Do you see that?

Porn, porn in the morning. I love porn in the morning. :devil:

Oh and the disappearing red cloth wasn't bad either. ;)
 
Lotsa fun!

For those of you who don't know, the 'Just for Laughs' comedy festival is quite a mainstream event. CBC televizes sketchs from it every week. I think that background makes this act all the funnier.

And as for the rabbit, I heard it was a beaver and is still magically on view if you look closely!
 
Straight-8 said:
And as for the rabbit, I heard it was a beaver and is still magically on view if you look closely!


By Jove, I think I saw it!

:D
 
Zeb_Carter said:
Oh and the disappearing red cloth wasn't bad either. ;)

Actually, the "disappearing red cloth" was NOT a cloth. If you watch closely, you will notice that the lady always uses her right hand to prepare for the extraction of the red object by her left hand. It appears that she is using her right hand to open a pocket or compartment in her clothing. She is. You will then notice that she usually works her hands once she has hidden the red object. There is a reason for the working.

Zeb, I would suggest that you not try playing poker for high stakes. You really do not have the necessary skills. Just a friendly suggestion.
 
R. Richard said:
Actually, the "disappearing red cloth" was NOT a cloth. If you watch closely, you will notice that the lady always uses her right hand to prepare for the extraction of the red object by her left hand. It appears that she is using her right hand to open a pocket or compartment in her clothing. She is. You will then notice that she usually works her hands once she has hidden the red object. There is a reason for the working.

Zeb, I would suggest that you not try playing poker for high stakes. You really do not have the necessary skills. Just a friendly suggestion.
But that's exactly how I make my living...playing poker. I've made millions.
 
Groovy.

The actual trick is pretty simple though, if you have the right prop. I've done it. Sans stripping.
 
Aurora Black said:
What was it, then? :confused:

If you look at the whole act, the "red cloth" actually disappears. The woman, especially in the final stages, has no practical place to hid the "red cloth." Thus, the "red cloth" is a substance that actually disappears. I don't claim to know exactly what the substance is, but it very probably disappears due to heat. If you have ever appeared on stage, you know how hot the lights are. Thus, the magician would have "red cloths" that were cooled down, probably in a refrigerator or on ice and then hidden within the performers clothing in insulated [more or less] pockets. Once the "red cloths" were removed from said pockets, they would begin to heat up. [You probably noticed that the performer always used the same two fingers of her left hand to hold the "red cloth. The fingers were also probably insulated, possibly with a clear spray coating. Thus, the performers fingers would not cause the "red cloth" to sublimate. Once in the performer's hand, the heat of her hand and the heat of the stage light environment would quickly cause the "red cloth" to sublimate. The performer could, of course, feel the material sublimate and would not "flash" her hands until the material had sublimated. Simple!
 
Zeb_Carter said:
But that's exactly how I make my living...playing poker. I've made millions.

Suuuuuurrrre you do! I will look forward to play a few hands against you sometime in Las Vegas. With a house dealer, the game will be straight and it will be just skill against skill. [Suuuuuurrrre it will!]
 
R. Richard said:
If you look at the whole act, the "red cloth" actually disappears. The woman, especially in the final stages, has no practical place to hid the "red cloth." Thus, the "red cloth" is a substance that actually disappears. I don't claim to know exactly what the substance is, but it very probably disappears due to heat. If you have ever appeared on stage, you know how hot the lights are. Thus, the magician would have "red cloths" that were cooled down, probably in a refrigerator or on ice and then hidden within the performers clothing in insulated [more or less] pockets. Once the "red cloths" were removed from said pockets, they would begin to heat up. [You probably noticed that the performer always used the same two fingers of her left hand to hold the "red cloth. The fingers were also probably insulated, possibly with a clear spray coating. Thus, the performers fingers would not cause the "red cloth" to sublimate. Once in the performer's hand, the heat of her hand and the heat of the stage light environment would quickly cause the "red cloth" to sublimate. The performer could, of course, feel the material sublimate and would not "flash" her hands until the material had sublimated. Simple!
Or she could just glue on a latex palm pocket. Simpler.

Note how whenever she pulls ot the cloth, she uses both hands. One to pull at the cloth and the other to hide the exact place she pulls it out from. Which is because she pulls it out of that hand.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top