Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I guess you and I have different opinions on what makes an erotic story. To me, 'erotic' means build-up of sexual tension; a good 'erotic' story has much, much more than only sex. Character building, for example. A good plot, as another one.
On the other hand, I consider a story being at least 60% geared towards sexual action, stories where the main character is in a state of orgasm for almost the entire story, to be porn.
Not judging here, but to me there's a distinction between erotic and porn, but that's nothing new.
Pornography is literally drawing or writing about prostitutes. By strict definition, a tale of one or more whores NOT having sex is pornography, as are paintings of semi-naked lounging hookers. In modern usage, pr0n and eroticism are points on a sexual spectrum with no hard line of separation. I put it as: in eroticism, sex is central to the story; in pr0n, sex IS the story.Not judging here, but to me there's a distinction between erotic and porn, but that's nothing new.
Pornography is literally drawing or writing about prostitutes. By strict definition, a tale of one or more whores NOT having sex is pornography, as are paintings of semi-naked lounging hookers. In modern usage, pr0n and eroticism are points on a sexual spectrum with no hard line of separation. I put it as: in eroticism, sex is central to the story; in pr0n, sex IS the story.
Some of my tales start, proceed, and finish with sex, but lots more may be going on than just rolling from fuck to fuck. Do I try to be arousing? Sure. Is arousal my only goal? Usually not.
I think the answer really depends on the category you're discussing. I'm going to pull out a table from the statistical analysis I did:Probably so. But that particular group is already well served. There is a glut of high-sex stroke stories on this site. Unless you have some very specific tastes, you can find a lifetime's worth of material in what's already been written here. As a writer, you're adding hay to a haystack that already has tonnes of it.
Readers who are looking for slower-moving stories... they may be a minority, but they're still a pretty large group, in my experience, and there aren't so many stories which cater to their tastes. Which means more demand for the authors who are writing that kind of material.
There might not be as many puffins as penguins out there, but the puffins really value the stuff that's written for them.
Good point. Personally, I write to entertain myself. It's fun to explore things behind the safety of a keyboard. The fact that some people seem to enjoy what I'm posting is just fun on top of fun.Do you write mainly for yourself, or to entertain or perturb others?
My advice is worth exactly what you pay for it, but here it is anyway.
For me, there has to be a component of discovery in the sex ... the protagonist has to find something that he or she hadn't explored, and it's the conflict that makes the story. Why hasn't it been explored? Was it ignorance, a bad previous experience, or simply the lack of opportunity? In the stories I like best, there's usually an element of conflict, and it's the resolution of that conflict in the MC's life that put the sex into context.
In any of these cases, the actual fucking is an intrinsic part of that process of discovery, as a means of resolving that conflict. The character comes out not only sexually satisfied, but changed in some fundamental way.
Censors generally lack imagination IMHO. I particularly like old 40s 50s movies because witty writers figured out how to get around censorship to say something.
My old Cross Country coach (whom I immortalized in prose as Sally Fulbright) said that in running as in life challenges make us better at what we do.
Love and Kisses
Lisa Ann
Write what actually works for the story.
Meaning, if the sex is NOT needed or is not critical to the story section, LEAVE IT OUT>
Meaning, if you have a chapter, and it has one sex scene, if you take the sex scene out completely, you leave it out if it doesn't stop the chapter from proceeding.
Yes. We're telling stories. People may or may not fuck during the narratives. We may or may not focus on the amount or quality of sexual activity. But asexual humans are likely not our focus here. And non-story writing gets tedious. So we write labored stories about real or fantasized sex. Why else should we bother posting on LIT?...all my stories here are principally about sex. When I sit down to write an erotic story, I want to write about sex, not my life story, or a space opera with occasional nighttime jousts with nubile aliens. Sex is the focus. So the OP's question is a good one. Assuming your story WILL have sex, how much of the other stuff should it have? There's no golden ratio, but for me there should be enough buildup to a) set up the character, the character's need, and the conflict the character faces, and b) get the character from point A (no sex but wanting sex) to point B (sex) in a plausible and entertaining way.
Write what actually works for the story.
Meaning, if the sex is NOT needed or is not critical to the story section, LEAVE IT OUT>
Meaning, if you have a chapter, and it has one sex scene, if you take the sex scene out completely, you leave it out if it doesn't stop the chapter from proceeding.
.
Readers who are looking for slower-moving stories... they may be a minority, but they're still a pretty large group, in my experience, and there aren't so many stories which cater to their tastes. Which means more demand for the authors who are writing that kind of material.
There might not be as many puffins as penguins out there, but the puffins really value the stuff that's written for them.
It always irritates me when people make a distinction between erotica and porn, because where is line drawn, and why should it be drawn at all?
.
Ultimately it's only about whether the characters and story are believable, and whether the sex is explicit.
The barnacles get uncomfortable.
Yes. We're telling stories. People may or may not fuck during the narratives. We may or may not focus on the amount or quality of sexual activity. But asexual humans are likely not our focus here. And non-story writing gets tedious. So we write labored stories about real or fantasized sex. Why else should we bother posting on LIT?
Exactly! Literotica is ALL about sex or why would you write on a site where that’s what 99% of our readers are here for. They may appreciate a good story, and a lot them do, but it’s the sex that’s the driver.
Now me, I get really bugged by mainstream novels that gloss over the sex.
Most of my stories have a final sex scene which is essentially spiking the football in the Happy Ever After zone. And I think readers love that kind of sex scene. They've followed the two main characters for many pages now, and hopefully they want the lovebirds to celebrate their love for each other with lots of hot sex. That sex scene doesn't advance the plot any, but I think provides catharsis for the reader.The problem with that theory, especially at Lit or similar places, is that in 99.9% of stories you don't need to describe the nuts and bolts of sex to advance an actual plot.
Literature and art have shown non-vanilla sexuality for millennia. Sacred bestiality; incestuous and queer kings; lesbian and nympho queens; peasant orgies. This ain't new stuff. Stories lacking sexual tension tend to be... bland. Or they sublimate sexuality, hide it behind politics, religion, technology, etc. IMHO those pushing sexless media are the worst pervs.
So, how much sex belongs in any story? That's for y'all to figure out.
Now me, I get really bugged by mainstream novels that gloss over the sex.
Exactly! Literotica is ALL about sex or why would you write on a site where that’s what 99% of our readers are here for. They may appreciate a good story, and a lot them do, but it’s the sex that’s the driver.
Now me, I get really bugged by mainstream novels that gloss over the sex.
My publisher, with both mainstream and erotica labels, has just made me cut some mild sex out of a mainstream book. I'd ask him just to transfer it over to the other label (and then beef up the sex) if it weren't part of a series in the mainstream. Ah, well.
But I'm surprised this thread is still going. The answer is obvious, never changes, and is a one-size-fits-all answer for a good many questions floated to the board. Each and every reader of the 100,000 plus readers who open stories on Literotica has his/her own sense of the right balance between storyline and sex (and even their own sense of balance probably is in continuous flux). There is no such universal ideal balance. Write to suit yourself or make your own, only partially applicable, guesses if your goal is to get meaningless votes and ratings here.
I'm currently re-reading much classic Golden Age SciFi, all glossed-over. No FMF oral daisychains till the 80s. The genre pulp fiction I recall abused every metaphor to avoid actually describing sex. A little mainstream fiction had brief fuckshots, maybe. But Anglophone societies seem very sex-repressed schizo. Is that a survivable kink?Now me, I get really bugged by mainstream novels that gloss over the sex.
in a nation where the average marriage lasts but 7 years.