Stephen Hawking: brief and humourous interview

G

Guest

Guest
QUESTIONS FOR STEPHEN HAWKING - The Science of Second-Guessing, DEBORAH SOLOMON, NYT, 12.12.2004

Q: What do you think was the most important physics idea to emerge this year?
A: We won't know for a few years.

Q: What about the recent discovery that teleportation of very small particles is actually possible? Will we one day be able to whisk ourselves through space the way they did on ''Star Trek''?
Q: The ''Star Trek'' version is bogus, but there's a sense in which Hawking radiation -- the light and particles that come out of black holes -- escapes by teleportation.

Q: Speaking of black holes, you recently confessed that you had made an error in your famous theory about them.
A: My discovery that black holes emit radiation raised serious problems of consistency with the rest of physics. I have now resolved these problems, but the answer turned out to be not what I expected.

Q: Do you feel that scientists correct themselves as often as they should?
A: More often than politicians, but not as often as they should.

Q: What is your I.Q.?
A: I have no idea. People who boast about their I.Q. are losers.

Q: How can we know if you qualify as a genius physicist, as you are invariably described?
A: The media need superheroes in science just as in every sphere of life, but there is really a continuous range of abilities with no clear dividing line.

Q; Are you saying you are not a genius?
A: I hope I'm near the upper end of the range.

Q: With all your intense erudition, why do you bother writing pop-science books about the universe, the latest of which is the illustrated version of ''On the Shoulders of Giants''?
A: I want my books sold on airport bookstalls.

Q: Are you always this cheerful?
A: Life would be tragic if it weren't funny.

Q: Seriously, how do you keep your spirits up?
A: My expectations were reduced to zero when I was 21. Everything since then has been a bonus.

Q: Indeed, incurable motor-neuron disease has confined you to a wheelchair and caused you to lose the ability even to speak. Is a computer your only means of communication?
A: I use an on-screen software keyboard, called E Z KEYS. I access this keyboard via a single button switch that I hold in my hand.

Q: You have long been associated with Cambridge University, in England, and I'm wondering whether you find Americans to be equally knowledegable about science.
A: I have found far greater enthusiasm for science in America than here in Britain. There is more enthusiasm for everything in America.

Q: How can you say that? Just last month a Gallup poll found that only 35 percent of Americans accept Darwin's theory of evolution, while 45 percent prefer the creationist view.
A: Maybe it is because people in America have less sense of belonging to a tradition and culture than in Europe, so they turn to fundamental religion.

Q: Do you believe in God?
A: I don't believe in a personal God.

Q: What do you think of President Bush's plan to get to Mars in 10 years?
A: Stupid. Robots would do a better job and be much cheaper because you don't have to bring them back.

Q: Do you think people will ever live on a planet besides Earth?
A: Yes, if we don't self-destruct first.

Q: What do you and your academic friends make of the debate over embryonic-stem-cell research in this country?
A: In Britain, like most of the developed world, stem-cell research is regarded as a great opportunity. America will be left behind if it doesn't change policy.

Q: Could stem-cell research help you at all?
A: Like Christopher Reeve, I'm very much in favor, but unlike he did, I don't expect to benefit personally.
 
perdita said:
Q: What is your I.Q.?
A: I have no idea. People who boast about their I.Q. are losers.

Definitely right (156). Ahem. :D

Steven Hawking is quite simply a superb human being. Doubt he's reading this, but he is an incredible scientist and a good man.

The Earl
 
perdita said:


Q: Seriously, how do you keep your spirits up?
A: My expectations were reduced to zero when I was 21. Everything since then has been a bonus.

I had no idea that he had such a sense of humor. It's that humor that makes comments like the above so powerful, to me.

Thanks, Perdita, for posting that interview. I quite enjoyed it.

Definitely right (156). Ahem.

Tread carefully, Earl. I once knew someone who at an early age was given an IQ score of 154. That person was one of the most conspicuous failures in all areas of life I have ever met. After a lengthy relationship in which I was frequenty reminded how much less intelligent I was, my charming companion went on to achieve a 0.0 grade point average (failing all classes) two semesters in a row, dropped out of college, continued chain smoking despite a family history of emphasema, and ended, at last contact, waiting on tables at a Denny's. And, just to clarify that I do not measure success purely in financial or academic terms, this person was miserable enough to have dug my new number out of a phone book and called me up to beg forgiveness and lament the state of affairs that had led to what was described as a steady downward spiral since our parting.

My impression? That person thought that scoring 154 had cleared all necessary hurdles, and that every challenge after that was a silly demand for proof of a superiority that should have been obvious. It was a wretched thing to watch.

Mind you, you're two points higher. I imagine that they make all of the difference ;)

(Only a cautionary tale for the populace, of course; I in no way intend to suggest that the good Earl is in the same boat.)

Shanglan
 
Great article. Thanks, Perdita!

I love this one:

Q: With all your intense erudition, why do you bother writing pop-science books about the universe, the latest of which is the illustrated version of ''On the Shoulders of Giants''?
A: I want my books sold on airport bookstalls.

What a guy!

Lou
 
Back
Top