Someone explain this please. Preferably a republitard.

Just keep telling yourself that, I feel sorry for you that you think any of these people in Washington who are in the pockets of lobbyists care about you including Bill Clinton and any of the Republicans when we get the lobbyists out of Washington then we will be on the road to fixing things and this effed up mess we have!
They are in the pockets of lobbyists because nobody who isn't can get anywhere. That does not mean they got into politics for cynical reasons. If you find this situation unacceptable, the solution is to make all campaign spending illegal. Make it like in France, where every candidate gets an equal allotment of free television time. Then they would not need donors, therefore would not need lobbyists.
 
They are in the pockets of lobbyists because nobody who isn't can get anywhere. That does not mean they got into politics for cynical reasons. If you find this situation unacceptable, the solution is to make all campaign spending illegal. Make it like in France, where every candidate gets an equal allotment of free television time. Then they would not need donors, therefore would not need lobbyists.
I agree 100% the way the system works now is politicians represent corporations not citizens
 
But the two parties are NOT the same, and it makes a real difference which wins elections. The lesser of two evils is still evil . . . but also still lesser. Ever since 1932, things in general in America have almost always gone better with Dems in charge -- the sole exception being Carter, and his time was a clusterfuck mainly for reasons entirely beyond his control, and he really is grossly underrated -- no Republican could have brought Israel and Egypt together, or wanted to.
Bears repeating.
 
I guess what I'm trying to say is if politicians are enriching themselves at the expense of the people they are supposed to represent they should not be in office. I don't care what letter is next to their name.
That's the kind we elect. Can you think of a better system?

I can -- see my posts above. Proportional representation and campaign finance reform might be politically impossible in the U.S., but those are at least more insightful and constructive suggestions than any form of both-sidesism or moral criticism. All you are doing is wishing pols and voters were better than they are. But it is not hard to identify the reasons why they are not.
 
That's the kind we elect. Can you think of a better system?

I can -- see my posts above. Proportional representation and campaign finance reform might be politically impossible in the U.S., but those are at least more insightful and constructive suggestions than any form of both-sidesism or moral criticism. All you are doing is wishing pols and voters were better than they are. But it is not hard to identify the reasons why they are not.
I know it can never happen in the United States but I do see some benefits to the parliamentary system
 
But it is not the SAME clusterfuck. Dems consistently do better for the people than Pubs.
I'm sorry as someone who considers himself on the left I disagree with you..
We all know what these politicians do when the cameras are on they point fingers at each other and blame each other and then at the end of the day they're having cocktails together yucking it up.
 
I'm sorry as someone who considers himself on the left I disagree with you..
We all know what these politicians do when the cameras are on they point fingers at each other and blame each other and then at the end of the day they're having cocktails together yucking it up.
But they also create public policies and vote on them and implement them. What the Dems do in THAT line is better than what the Pubs do.

What's the leftist solution? Revolution? Revolutions are sometimes worth having, but they're always chancy. Even when the revolutionaries can be sure of winning, they can never be sure of what comes next. You take the Oath of the Tennis Court, and next thing you know, Napoleon is Emperor.
 
Last edited:
But they also create public polices and vote on them and implement them. What the Dems do in THAT line is better than what the Pubs do.

What's the leftist solution? Revolution? Revolutions are sometimes worth having, but they're always chancy. Even when the revolutionaries can be sure of winning, they can never be sure of what comes next. You take the Oath of the Tennis Court, and next thing you know, Napoleon is Emperor.
The best solution would be to get the corporations out of DC...
If that's revolution I'm all for it.
 
The best solution would be to get the corporations out of DC...
If that's revolution I'm all for it.
Nothing less than revolution would. But the same revolution would also get the corporations out of NYC, out of all the USA, and many Americans would be frightened at THAT prospect!
 
Slick “Hot Tub Bub” Clinton and underage women pix have been leaking for years. You’ve known about it, we’ve all known about it. He’s guilty as sin. Even happened on his watch.

You, dutiful Useful Idiot Hoser you are, attempt to post pix of President Trump w family and pass it off as criminal. You’re not the brightest bulb on the Christmas tree…

View attachment 2585448
Trump has 40 years of being accused of being a pedophile, has been held liable for sexual assault, paid off sexual assault accusers, was best friends for over a decade with the worlds biggest pedophile, is in pictures with young girls. I could go on, but tell me more about how Clinton is the only guilty one...lmao

Talk about being an imbecile! You're an idiot pedophile protector.
 
Back
Top