SevMax2
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2019
- Posts
- 6,264
...it will be interesting to see if:
1. We can avoid nuclear brinkmanship as Putin grows more desperate. The willingness of some of the more hawkish Democrats and neocon, Romney-type Republicans to push the envelope there is a bit disturbing.
2. If the press can admit that we're not really in a second Cold War after pretending that we are for some odd reason. It's a proxy war, sure, but Putin's ability to command satellite states seems largely limited to Belarus and puppet states in eastern Ukraine (mostly oppressed and alienated ethnic minorities) and Georgia.
3. If, despite the waste of money given to line the pockets of politicians and cronies in Ukraine, we indeed got the best bang for our buck. The good news is that recent events have shown surprising strength by the Ukrainian military in terms of throwing the Russians off-balance, in spite of heavy losses to manpower and as well as the massive economic dislocation suffered by so many in Ukraine. Every Ukrainian killed or wounded in action against a Russian caught a bullet that an American or Israeli or German need never fear and the ability of Russia to force project in the future is severely compromised.
4. Russia's government even survives the present fiasco. I'm leaning toward implosion or disintegration myself, with more autonomous Russian territories simply breaking away over time.
5. The extent of Russian influence on media and social media, however limited, downplayed, embellished, or whatever, simply fades away.
6. BRICs slowly dissolves or rapidly collapses. It might be the former, as Russia's supposed partners might have invested a lot in this particular pipe dream out of ambition, only to see egg on their faces that they don't wish to acknowledge yet.
7. The loss of a sponsor like Russia will cause unraveling to expedite in Syria, Iran, North Korea, Belarus, Palestine, and Cuba. Most likely, I think so, yes. Many of those countries depend greatly on Russia's patronage, and while not vassal states for the most part, they represent what little clout the Kremlin retains in geopolitics.
Any thoughts?
1. We can avoid nuclear brinkmanship as Putin grows more desperate. The willingness of some of the more hawkish Democrats and neocon, Romney-type Republicans to push the envelope there is a bit disturbing.
2. If the press can admit that we're not really in a second Cold War after pretending that we are for some odd reason. It's a proxy war, sure, but Putin's ability to command satellite states seems largely limited to Belarus and puppet states in eastern Ukraine (mostly oppressed and alienated ethnic minorities) and Georgia.
3. If, despite the waste of money given to line the pockets of politicians and cronies in Ukraine, we indeed got the best bang for our buck. The good news is that recent events have shown surprising strength by the Ukrainian military in terms of throwing the Russians off-balance, in spite of heavy losses to manpower and as well as the massive economic dislocation suffered by so many in Ukraine. Every Ukrainian killed or wounded in action against a Russian caught a bullet that an American or Israeli or German need never fear and the ability of Russia to force project in the future is severely compromised.
4. Russia's government even survives the present fiasco. I'm leaning toward implosion or disintegration myself, with more autonomous Russian territories simply breaking away over time.
5. The extent of Russian influence on media and social media, however limited, downplayed, embellished, or whatever, simply fades away.
6. BRICs slowly dissolves or rapidly collapses. It might be the former, as Russia's supposed partners might have invested a lot in this particular pipe dream out of ambition, only to see egg on their faces that they don't wish to acknowledge yet.
7. The loss of a sponsor like Russia will cause unraveling to expedite in Syria, Iran, North Korea, Belarus, Palestine, and Cuba. Most likely, I think so, yes. Many of those countries depend greatly on Russia's patronage, and while not vassal states for the most part, they represent what little clout the Kremlin retains in geopolitics.
Any thoughts?