So, if Dzhokhar Tsarnaev had contacts with radical Islamic clerics.

[Sean]

He doesn't have to disclose them, right?

http://rhrealitycheck.org/article/2...ction-for-conversations-with-tiller-murderer/

 

[KingOrfeo]

He's a criminal defendant, he doesn't have to disclose anything.

 

[hogjack]

Disclosure, no.

Exposure, yes. Prison guards expect it.

 

[Sean]

He's a criminal defendant, he doesn't have to disclose anything.

I may have worded that wrong. Read the piece and you'll get what I mean.

 

[pointless]

his name makes me think of john carter. yep.

 

[bronzeage]

In this case, it is the clerics which are protected by the religious minister privilege, not Tsarnaev.

Tsarnaev does not have to reveal anything because he is protected by the 5th Amendment.

 

[Sean]

In this case, it is the clerics which are protected by the religious minister privilege, not Tsarnaev.

Tsarnaev does not have to reveal anything because he is protected by the 5th Amendment.

Yeah, as I said, my OP was horribly written. I blame the paint fumes.