Lancecastor
Lit's Most Beloved Poster
- Joined
- May 14, 2002
- Posts
- 54,670
Snowdon should be pardoned, returned to the USA, then arrested and shot for treason.
Shhh, don't tell him.
Shhh, don't tell him.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You should leave at least half an hour in between posting under your official username and posting under one of your attack alts.
I concur.
Snowden should have gone to the proper civilian oversight committee with proof of illegal activities. No oath of allegiance compels you to perform illegal acts. No soldier can claim protection by claiming to have just been following orders. You are in facts obligated to refuse such orders and report them to proper authorities. Be they a superior officer, service ombudsman or civilian oversight wallahs.
He should not have revealed information that while distasteful was legally obtained. It is one thing to be a whistleblower but he crossed the line into treason.
Probably those committees would have tried to burry the whole issue while taking Snowden for a patsy.
Wasn't there another whistleblowers before Snowden, who tried to go through official channels and
ran into a lot of trouble afterwards?
Snowden should have gone to the proper civilian oversight committee with proof of illegal activities. No oath of allegiance compels you to perform illegal acts. No soldier can claim protection by claiming to have just been following orders. You are in facts obligated to refuse such orders and report them to proper authorities. Be they a superior officer, service ombudsman or civilian oversight wallahs.
He should not have revealed information that while distasteful was legally obtained. It is one thing to be a whistleblower but he crossed the line into treason.
Stealing, as in theft or burglary, involves removing something which is now in the miscreant's possession and is no longer possessed by its owner. I can steal a loaf of bread or whatever. If I copy data and leave the original in place, I may have violated copyright or security laws, but I haven't removed the original -- I haven't 'stolen' it.
Instead, if I make the copy publicly available, I have freed it. (And not in the sense of 'liberated' = stolen.) Someone has evidence of their crimes. Someone else releases that evidence for the world to judge. What was stolen? Only the coverup.



Maybe I should have written you rather than I. Then we could laugh at everyone else.You sure have a funny way of staying out of trouble.![]()