Should I Curcumsize?

SexyMale005

Virgin
Joined
Aug 5, 2005
Posts
1
i have not yet.. but i dont know if i should.. its kind of a pain in the butt. for girls? does it really matter.. cuz i only care if it matters for girls
 
Ok maybe I'm just special, but if I pull my foreskin back it's identical to being circumcized, but it's not permanent. In my experience, circumcision does not change things for women.
 
i dont think any more pleasure is gained from getting cut. As far as the pain goes....I know someone that had it done at 32 years old. They wouldnt do it again, I can tell you that, even with his wife naggin him about getting it done. Most women will get used to the "old school" look if you keep the cheese out from under your forskin. Lastly I dont think I would ask someone else if its worth it....that would be up to you and the question of "is my doctor gonna give me enough meds to get through this".
 
My buddy Bobby had this done in college. He said that he had more problems not with the procedure, which he said was painful, but with the new, extra sensitivity of having no foreskin. He said that his cloths caused a lot of chaffing on that once protected skin, and he felt like he was walking around incredibly aware of his cock all the time. It took him a long time to get use to the feeling and it drove him crazy.
 
SexyMale005 said:
i have not yet.. but i dont know if i should.. its kind of a pain in the butt. for girls? does it really matter.. cuz i only care if it matters for girls
I think that getting circumcised for the "girls" is a really dumb reason to consider such a procedure. If you're having a medical problem for which a doctor has recommended it, then go for it, but why subject yourself to the discomfort if you're not having any problems?
 
If I were a man, I wouldn't.

I've slept with circumcised men and intact men and I really think that, generally, the intact men are more sensitive and better lovers. Now, before anyone gets up in arms, I am quite sure there are plenty of exceptions and this is only my experience.

It seems that when you lose foreskin, you lose sensation. I wouldn't think that could be a good thing.
 
OceanGoddess said:
I've slept with circumcised men and intact men and I really think that, generally, the intact men are more sensitive and better lovers. Now, before anyone gets up in arms, I am quite sure there are plenty of exceptions and this is only my experience.
I'm not getting up in arms, and I understand that you're drawing on personal experience, but I'm not sure that there's a relationship between an intact foreskin and sexual ability.

Good sex starts in the mind, not in the foreskin.
 
OceanGoddess said:
I've slept with circumcised men and intact men and I really think that, generally, the intact men are more sensitive and better lovers. Now, before anyone gets up in arms, I am quite sure there are plenty of exceptions and this is only my experience.

It seems that when you lose foreskin, you lose sensation. I wouldn't think that could be a good thing.

it doesn't mean that uncut men are more sensitive and better lovers, its just the ones you've been with that are sensitive and better lovers happen to be uncut guys.
 
Definitely not! I wouldn't get my son's circumsized...do you know how they do that? Why would a grown man consider it? If it matters that much to your woman ...and forget 'women' in general...you've got the wrong woman.

No...no...no.

Absolutely nothing wrong with the way God created you.
 
i personally wouldn't recommend circumcision. getting an elective procedure done in that area isn't something i'd recommend lightly. hygiene can be an issue for some but seeing as you've lived your life thus far with your foreskin anyway, why change?

IMX, most women are more accustomed to cut versions, but i've been told that being unusual in that regard isn't a bad thing, personally. :>

ed
 
OceanGoddess said:
It seems that when you lose foreskin, you lose sensation. I wouldn't think that could be a good thing.
Well, seeing since a common complaint among women is that their men don't last nearly long enough before cumming, I would think that the decrease in sensation would lead to an increase in stamina... Isn't THAT a good thing? :p
 
phoenix1224 said:
Well, seeing since a common complaint among women is that their men don't last nearly long enough before cumming, I would think that the decrease in sensation would lead to an increase in stamina... Isn't THAT a good thing? :p
What he said and the no more cheese thing. Just typing that makes me want to clean myself.
 
phoenix1224 said:
Well, seeing since a common complaint among women is that their men don't last nearly long enough before cumming, I would think that the decrease in sensation would lead to an increase in stamina... Isn't THAT a good thing? :p

It's a good argument, but I would much rather my partner have more sensation and last a shorter time than less feeling and last longer. My hubby is circumcised and he doesn't last very long if it's his first orgasm of the night, but we can always go again, so it's not an issue for women like me. I've never seen an uncircumcised man in real life, but I've read that vaginal sex with them can be a lot better for women, because there's less friction and fewer issues with lube, etc.

As others have said, it's your decision alone, but my opinion is that as long as you have good hygiene (as all men and women should) and there are no medical problems, you shouldn't mess with nature and purposely rob yourself of so much pleasure.
 
SweetErika said:
. . . so it's not an issue for women like me. I've never seen an uncircumcised man in real life, but I've read that vaginal sex with them can be a lot better for women, because there's less friction and fewer issues with lube, etc.

. . .
It's because they come with their own sleeve. And thinking of it that way, it seems like they'd take a lot longer to finish a lady (i.e. mr uncut is pumping away maddly, but he's really just moving within his own skin, so the lady recieves a lot less friction). Of course that pure speculation because a) I'm cut and B) I'm not gay / female.
 
I find when I'm really aroused then it's tough for the foreskin to be pulled back up anyway, so I don't think it's likely (for me at least) that the woman is feeling less friction because of the skin moving back and forth
 
I have a friend who's Jewish and about to give birth to a boy. She's having problems with this subject because she's Jewish so she feels she has to have it done to her son but she saw a show on tv about it and now considers it "cruel and unusual punnishment." Having never seen one, (I'm a daycare teacher so I've seen babies', but that doesn't count!) I couldn't say anything about feeling or looks but after what my friend's been saying... I see no point in doing it.
 
Curcumsizion is a simple proceadure that removes the Fore skin of the penis. The Modern reason of why some one would do this is because the for skin covers the head of the penis, the flaps of skin over the head can catch moister as well as bactera causing infection, and an infection on the penis is really really REALLY painful.

The Actual Reason of why circimsion is done is because of christianity. In christian faith masterbation is consider a bad thing, and through the ages they tried to come up with multiple ways inorder for people to Not masterbate.

an example of this is Grahm crackers. (invented by minster Grahm(sp)) which brought up the 'fact' If you Eat pure wheat when you get the urge to masterbate, then it will take away that urge.

Curcimsion is another reason, through medical obersvation it is found that the forskin of the penis has the most nerve endings through out the entier penis. the idea is that the forskin is where you Felt masterbation, and if you cut that off then the feeling would stop as would the desire. now in truth, foreskin is laden with nerve endings and often make intercorse feel a bit better to men because you have more nerve endings being stimulated.

in the end it ends up being more of a choice, the uncircimzied penis is more prone to infections and uti's but is more pleasurable (aurged) but a circimzied penis is cleaner, simpler and easyer to maintain. but with the loss of those nerve endings then you have less pleasure in the bed.

if you are circimzed at an early age then it really wont make a diffrence because you have nothing to compare it against, in your age then it would be something youd need to consider.

any and all questions about this is usualy best discused with your docter. they will give you the best advisment for such a thing.
 
Pyro Paul said:
Curcumsizion is a simple proceadure that removes the Fore skin of the penis. The Modern reason of why some one would do this is because the for skin covers the head of the penis, the flaps of skin over the head can catch moister as well as bactera causing infection, and an infection on the penis is really really REALLY painful.

The Actual Reason of why circimsion is done is because of christianity. In christian faith masterbation is consider a bad thing, and through the ages they tried to come up with multiple ways inorder for people to Not masterbate.

an example of this is Grahm crackers. (invented by minster Grahm(sp)) which brought up the 'fact' If you Eat pure wheat when you get the urge to masterbate, then it will take away that urge.

Curcimsion is another reason, through medical obersvation it is found that the forskin of the penis has the most nerve endings through out the entier penis. the idea is that the forskin is where you Felt masterbation, and if you cut that off then the feeling would stop as would the desire. now in truth, foreskin is laden with nerve endings and often make intercorse feel a bit better to men because you have more nerve endings being stimulated.

in the end it ends up being more of a choice, the uncircimzied penis is more prone to infections and uti's but is more pleasurable (aurged) but a circimzied penis is cleaner, simpler and easyer to maintain. but with the loss of those nerve endings then you have less pleasure in the bed.

if you are circimzed at an early age then it really wont make a diffrence because you have nothing to compare it against, in your age then it would be something youd need to consider.

any and all questions about this is usualy best discused with your docter. they will give you the best advisment for such a thing.


Your mastery of the English language is admirable.
 
qina: if your friend is of the orthodox persuasion, she doesn't really have a choice in the matter: it's an absolute necessity, religiously, as it marks a covenant (i forget which, though).

reform jews however may feel a bit differently--i can't speak to reform theology.

ed
 
It really doesn't matter. My man is uncircumsized and the sex it GREAT! ;) Good-luck with your decision! :)
 
I've never gone with the "infection" excuse, easy to deal with just wash it. Pull the skin back and clean. simple. Like washing behind your ears.
 
Pyro Paul said:
any and all questions about this is usualy best discused with your docter. they will give you the best advisment for such a thing.

Not so. I had it done for medical reasons a few years ago, and it is something I deeply regret. My doctor never informed me of any alternatives.

My foreskin had never pulled back, and I was completely ignorant of masturbation, so I unable to provide an empirical comparison.

The operation was botched. After the surgery, the head fused to the shaft, resulting in bent, incomplete, and occasional painful erections. Skin has grown over the sensetive underside (I am unable to find the proper term), reducing sensetivity to nearly nothing. Keratinisation has developed over the head, also reducing sensetivity.

I don't see why one could possible want such a thing, much less how society allows, and even encourages, the permanent mutilation of unconsenting babies.
 
don't do it. Who gives a fuck about lasting longer. More pleasure is where it's at. You can always go a second round if the lady needs it.

I'll always be pissed my parents "killed my boy." (said using Marlon Brando's Godfather voice)
 
Back
Top