Shireen Abu Akleh

colddiesel

Literotica Guru
Joined
Aug 22, 2006
Posts
5,526
Do Americans on this board have any views on the shooting death of this American/Palestinian woman journalist (Al Jazeera) in Jerusalem. Normally you guys react quite strongly to the wrongful killing of Americans, even females, and even a Palestinian female, providing that she is an American.
 
^^ Israeli terrorists.

Then they beat the pallbearers at her funeral.
 
It's the first time I'm hearing about it.
Honestly, with politics the way they are here,
the only shooters we care about are the white ones.
Their victims are the martyrs of the gun-confiscation movement.

That's even more important that wars, conflicts and the victims of them.

(Black people killing black people en masse, well that's just an offshoot of white privilege.)
__________________________________________
Democrat born. Democrat bred. Libertarian led (by Democrats).
 
The truth and boots, or something...

;) ;)
__________________________________________
Democrat born. Democrat bred. Libertarian led (by Democrats).
 

Bennett: Video indicates Palestinian gunfire killed Al Jazeera reporter​

May 11, 2022 @ 11:56
PM Naftali Bennett while deploring the death of the Shirin Abu Aqleh accused Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas of blaming Israel “without concrete evidence.” He pointed to video footage of a Palestinian gunman boasting they had killed an Israeli soldier and showing a fallen body, but in fact, no soldiers were injured. The fallen body was therefore likely the late Shirin Abu Aqleh. The Palestinian Authority also rejected Israel’s offer of a joint autopsy to establish the truth. The incident has wide ramifications in that the correspondent was also an US citizen.
this has been wholly debunked. he's just saying things to deflect and try to wait for people to forget
 
Shireen Bbu Akleh was shot during an Israeli military raid on Palestinian territory. She was unarmed wearing a flak jacket (denoting Press) and helmet before the shooting. The helmet was removed and she died instantly from a single shot to the head. Israeli forces will investigate the incident and report their findings to themselves.

When her body was being transported from the hospital, Israeli police first required that she be transported by car rather than be carried. When the pall bearers removed her body from the vehicle near the cemetery in East Jerusalem, where she lived, the armed Israeli police baton charged the crowd, seizing flags and beating the mourners. None of the mourners appears to have been armed in any of the many videos of the event. The Israeli police will investigate the conduct of the mourners and their own actions, and report back, firstly to themselves, and then to the responsible minister.

Diplomatic staff from many countries have expressed their concern over the original incident and again concerning the aggression of the Police at the funeral. Blinken voiced his concerns on behalf of the USA.
 
Look, no one has a lot of sympathy for the reporters who put themselves in harm's way.
Do we want them to be shot? No, we don't want them to be fucking shot,
but when you dive into where the bullets are flying, the combatants
are trying to stay alive and prevail and have not the luxury
of worrying about those whom purposely put
themselves into the crossfire.

When you want the story so badly that you become the story,
then you become a sensationalist and not a journalist.

Who knows? Maybe the reporter had martyrdom in the back of her mind; to be used as propaganda...
People do misguided stuff when passion overcomes professionalism.
__________________________________________
Democrat born. Democrat bred. Libertarian led (by Democrats).
 
Look, no one has a lot of sympathy for the reporters who put themselves in harm's way.
Do we want them to be shot? No, we don't want them to be fucking shot,
but when you dive into where the bullets are flying, the combatants
are trying to stay alive and prevail and have not the luxury
of worrying about those whom purposely put
themselves into the crossfire.

When you want the story so badly that you become the story,
then you become a sensationalist and not a journalist.

Who knows? Maybe the reporter had martyrdom in the back of her mind; to be used as propaganda...
People do misguided stuff when passion overcomes professionalism.
__________________________________________
Democrat born. Democrat bred. Libertarian led (by Democrats).
what absolute tripe

she wsa standing at the end of a path and was shot while wearing a blue flak jacket and helpmet that clearly said Press. She clearly didn;t deliberately place herself in the path of a bullet

And she's been covering the conflict for over 20 years, so I think it's pretty stupid to argue she wished to be martyred
 
Most Diplomatic staff are life-long professionals whose stock in trade is expressing "concern."

The problem with concern is that it is subjective when diplomacy should be objective.
 
Look, no one has a lot of sympathy for the reporters who put themselves in harm's way.
Do we want them to be shot? No, we don't want them to be fucking shot,
but when you dive into where the bullets are flying, the combatants
are trying to stay alive and prevail and have not the luxury
of worrying about those whom purposely put
themselves into the crossfire.

When you want the story so badly that you become the story,
then you become a sensationalist and not a journalist.

Who knows? Maybe the reporter had martyrdom in the back of her mind; to be used as propaganda...
People do misguided stuff when passion overcomes professionalism.
__________________________________________
Democrat born. Democrat bred. Libertarian led (by Democrats).
Hmmmm. I wonder how you get your news otherwise. Psychics are good of course. You sound cold blooded.
 
There is not direct path in a firefight.
Rounds go everywhere and ricochets are not unknown.
__________________________________________
Democrat born. Democrat bred. Libertarian led (by Democrats).
 
Hmmmm. I wonder how you get your news otherwise. Psychics are good of course. You sound cold blooded.
You don't need to be on hand in a firefight to know what the news is.
__________________________________________
Democrat born. Democrat bred. Libertarian led (by Democrats).
 
There is not direct path in a firefight.
Rounds go everywhere and ricochets are not unknown.
__________________________________________
Democrat born. Democrat bred. Libertarian led (by Democrats).
I think you might need to read a bit more about this before you comment, or watch the video. It was literally a path with concrete walls. It was round that came down said path and entered her head. It wasn;t a ricochet
 
You don't need to be on hand in a firefight to know what the news is.
__________________________________________
Democrat born. Democrat bred. Libertarian led (by Democrats).
it appears it helps since you don't seem to understand what happened-that's the function of News, no?
 
You don't need to be on hand in a firefight to know what the news is.
__________________________________________
Democrat born. Democrat bred. Libertarian led (by Democrats).
Maybe Miss Cleo told you this.
 
it appears it helps since you don't seem to understand what happened-that's the function of News, no?
How close do you have to be to know who is shooting at who and why?

It's not a boxing match, we don't need a blow for blow (shot for shot).
You need reasons, initial conditions and outcomes.
Everything in between has most eloquently been referred to as "the fog of war."
The journalists know, just like a cop, or a firefighter, that every time they jump into the fray, they are in danger.

The difference is, the former examples are saving lives and the latter are tits on a boar hog...
__________________________________________
Democrat born. Democrat bred. Libertarian led (by Democrats).
 
Back
Top